Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread Brent Baisley
That's quite a query. You may not be able to optimize it well with those nested selects. You may want to think about changing your query around a little, perhaps joining pieces of data using whatever programming language you're using on the front end. You have MySQL doing a lot of work and

Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread David T. Ashley
On 6/27/07, Dave G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: select payload_time,HEX(processed_data) from data__ProcessedDataFrames where test_id=18 AND top_level_product_name="DataProduct" AND payload_time > 11808.74704 AND payload_time < 1180564096.24967; What I'm concerned about is with how much data I

Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread Dave G
I do, but I don't see any way around that with the data I have. Dave G. > Good Afternoon David > > sounds as if you have a number of non-unique indices (even possibly FTS!) > slowing down queries..this should help you concentrate on the slower > indices > mysql> > select TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,IN

Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread Dave G
I think I can do that: I don't have any other indexes, just the keys. mysql> show create table data__ProcessedDataFrames; +---+--

Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread Martin Gainty
Good Afternoon David sounds as if you have a number of non-unique indices (even possibly FTS!) slowing down queries..this should help you concentrate on the slower indices mysql> select TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,INDEX_NAME from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.STATISTICS where NON_UNIQUE=1; Anyone else? Mart

Re: optimization help

2007-06-27 Thread David T. Ashley
On 6/27/07, Dave G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Queries on this table when it gets large is slow as molasses. I'm thinking about making a new table for anything with a different test_id any opinions as to whether this is good or bad? Hi Dave G., We need to know how: a)How large the tabl

Re: Optimization help

2004-01-12 Thread Mike Schienle
On Jan 12, 2004, at 08:09 AM, Douglas Sims wrote: I think... you don't have an index on the "Incident" field itself, just on (Date, Incident, Type, Task) which means that it concatenates those fields and orders the result - thus this may be virtually useless if you're looking for a specific inc

Re: Optimization help

2004-01-12 Thread Douglas Sims
I think... you don't have an index on the "Incident" field itself, just on (Date, Incident, Type, Task) which means that it concatenates those fields and orders the result - thus this may be virtually useless if you're looking for a specific incident within a large date range. Since your query