Re:Possible bug in ORDER BY timestamp

2001-10-18 Thread Lael Griffith
Thanks for the help everyone. I tried changing the type to Œtimestamp¹ and that did not fix the problem, however when I changed the type to Œint¹ and it worked as it was suppose to. Thanks, Lael

Re:Possible bug?

2001-10-02 Thread Chris
Heikki, Update on this. Managed to get this to happen with the file updates you sent, on an internal box(same config as original problem rpt), log info follows: //Log file starts 011002 13:28:19 mysqld started InnoDB: Database was not shut down normally.

Re:Possible bug?

2001-10-02 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Hi! The log sequence number is only 300 000 bytes :). You have data and log files which are almost completely full of zeros, and consequently if you compress them with gzip, you are able to send them to me as attachments. Some notes on possible Linux bugs: I notice that you are running the

Re:Possible bug?

2001-09-27 Thread Chris
Heikki, Here's the details from the .err log: New value of fp=(nil) failed sanity check, terminating stack trace! Please read http://www.mysql.com/doc/U/s/Using_stack_trace.html and follow instructions on how to resolve the stack trace. Resolved stack trace is much more helpful in diagnosing

Re:Possible bug?

2001-09-26 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Chris, what is the exact error message? How do you know that it comes from ibuf0ibuf.c, line 2339? Have you compiled yourself? Regards, Heikki Innobase Oy Getting an error message in the log saying...fp=(nil), etc, etc, possible bug from ibuf0ibuf.c, line 2339 What're the possible reasons I

Re:Possible bug with InnoDB table

2001-04-25 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Tianlin, you are right. If InnoDB did a scan from a secondary index to an empty table, then it returned an error code MySQL did not accept in this context. I changed now the error code and it will be right in the next release .38, if Monty has not yet gotten it out. Regards, Heikki