Re: Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-03-02 Thread Tõnu Samuel
Tim Bunce wrote: Only problem we know is that in our tests on ReiserFS is MySQL was 30% faster on writes :/ How does it compare to FreeBSD with "soft updates" enabled? Sorry, I use only linux and very rarely touch anything else. So this 30% was meant under linux. Sorry for confusion. I

Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread alexander . skwar
On 22.02.2001 16:22:13 Simon Windsor wrote: Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? HERE! No problems whatsoever - why should there be problems anyway? - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com

Re: Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread Tõnu Samuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.02.2001 16:22:13 Simon Windsor wrote: Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? HERE! No problems whatsoever - why should there be problems anyway? Only problem we know is that in our tests on ReiserFS is MySQL was 30% faster on writes

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread Tõnu Samuel
Peter Skipworth wrote: I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well, shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from people

Antwort: Re: Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread alexander . skwar
On 23.02.2001 10:29:21 ?iso-8859-1?Q?T=F5nu?= Samuel wrote: Only problem we know is that in our tests on ReiserFS is MySQL was 30% faster on writes :/ Hmm, so, I understand you right: You're saying that it's not a good idea to use MySQL on ReiserFS, as you may get a speed rush? *G*

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread Tõnu Samuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23.02.2001 10:29:21 ?iso-8859-1?Q?T=F5nu?= Samuel wrote: Only problem we know is that in our tests on ReiserFS is MySQL was 30% faster on writes :/ Hmm, so, I understand you right: You're saying that it's not a good idea to use MySQL on ReiserFS, as you

Re: Antwort: ReisserFS

2001-02-23 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Tnu Samuel wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.02.2001 16:22:13 Simon Windsor wrote: Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? HERE! No problems whatsoever - why should there be problems anyway? Only problem we know

ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Simon Windsor
Hi Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom that you are willing to share ? Thanks Simon -- Simon Windsor CricInfo http://www.cricinfo.com/ Tel: +44 (0) 1249 700720 Fax: +44 (0) 1249 700725 Email: mailto

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Jan-Aage Bruvoll
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote: Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom that you are willing to share ? No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch the MySQL stuff

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Jeremy D. Zawodny
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:22:13PM +, Simon Windsor wrote: Hi Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? Yes. Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom that you are willing to share ? It "just works". :-) -- Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL

RE: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Sander Pilon
-Original Message- From: Simon Windsor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 February 2001 16:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ReisserFS Hi Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? Where any problems encountered ? and do you have any pearls of wisdom that you

RE: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Gupta, Sanjeev
-Original Message- From: Jan-Aage Bruvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ReisserFS On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote: Has anyone user MySql on a ReisserFS file system ? Where any problems

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes: On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Windsor wrote: No problems at all. Even power outages and severe crashes did not touch the MySQL stuff on the ReiserFS file system, but that's probably all luck. :-) Regards, Jan No, that is not just luck. ReiserFS is

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Jan-Aage Bruvoll
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: No, that is not just luck. ReiserFS is a journalling file system. Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side, since all buffers were flushed at the time of

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Jan-Aage Bruvoll writes: On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: No, that is not just luck. ReiserFS is a journalling file system. Sure thing. The luck part was referring to the fact that even the consistency in the tables was ok, which is more on the luck side, since

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread William R. Mussatto
RE ReiserFS What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size MySql will support on it? Thanks. Sincerely, William Mussatto, Senior Systems Engineer CyberStrategies, Inc ph. 909-920-9154 ext. 27 -

Re: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Jan-Aage Bruvoll
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, William R. Mussatto wrote: What is the hardware (32 bit or 64) and what is the maximum files size MySql will support on it? Thanks. I'm a mere end user when it comes to ReiserFS... I think you should be able to find all information you need on http://www.reiserfs.com/ As

RE: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Peter Skipworth
I'd heard that even in general use, some users had a noticeable increase in disk reads/writes under ReiserFS...it sounds like you haven't experienced this (?). I'm thinking about moving over to ReiserFS as well, shortly, and am looking for as much feedback from people using it as possible...

RE: ReisserFS

2001-02-22 Thread Sander Pilon
Right, As far as *MySQL* goes I haven't noticed this in particular. That's because most mysql reads are indexed and use keys/caches. As far as general performance goes, I've definitely noticed it. (Creation/Deletion of large and large number of files is much, MUCH faster than ext2 - and