Hello.
>My conclusion so far: The data is in the relay-log on C but it's not put
>into the database for some reason. I simply have no clue what reason it
>could be. In fact i'm a little bit confused right now so any help is
>very welcome.
In you original message you told you were worki
no clue what reason it
could be. In fact i'm a little bit confused right now so any help is
very welcome.
Greetings
Frank
From: Gleb PaharenkoDate: December 28 2005 4:01pm
Subject: Re: Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C
Hello.
>So now my questio
Hello.
>So now my question is: is it basically possible to do this or doesn't mysql
>replication mechanism support this setup? If it is possible: Any idea where
>the problem could be? If it's not possible: any idea for a different setup
>that would allow to this?
You should localize the pr
Hi all
i have a question related to replication on 4.0.x.
I have the following setup:
A -> B -> C
A is a Master and writes all changes to its binlog (meaning there is no
filter set).
B acts as Slave from A and as Master for C. As a Slave B has filters set, so
not every change of every databas
From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Replication_Options.html
--log-slave-updates
Normally, updates received from a master server by a slave are not
logged to its binary log. This option tells the slave to log the updates
performed by its SQL thread to the slave's own binary log. For this
Hello all:
I have set the repliaction between A and B server successfully.
While the B server replicate the data from A server,we fould the relay log
refreshing.But the master log has no change.
Since we want to add a Server C to replicate the Server B, the master log must
existing a
