Re: Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C

2006-01-06 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hello. >My conclusion so far: The data is in the relay-log on C but it's not put >into the database for some reason. I simply have no clue what reason it >could be. In fact i'm a little bit confused right now so any help is >very welcome. In you original message you told you were worki

RE: Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C

2006-01-03 Thread Frank Fischer
no clue what reason it could be. In fact i'm a little bit confused right now so any help is very welcome. Greetings Frank From: Gleb PaharenkoDate: December 28 2005 4:01pm Subject: Re: Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C Hello. >So now my questio

Re: Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C

2005-12-28 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hello. >So now my question is: is it basically possible to do this or doesn't mysql >replication mechanism support this setup? If it is possible: Any idea where >the problem could be? If it's not possible: any idea for a different setup >that would allow to this? You should localize the pr

Replication A->B->C - changes on B are not replicated to C

2005-12-28 Thread Frank Fischer
Hi all i have a question related to replication on 4.0.x. I have the following setup: A -> B -> C A is a Master and writes all changes to its binlog (meaning there is no filter set). B acts as Slave from A and as Master for C. As a Slave B has filters set, so not every change of every databas