Hi.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:01:35PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:21:57PM -0700, Igbar Foosenhopper wrote:
> > Thursday, August 30, 2001, 2:13:56 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > CT> A quick question: How come the mailing list software
> > CT> doesn't add a reply-to heade
> There is also a famous document about reply-to:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Here's another point of view as well:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
As little as it has to do with databases, just for the record I'm on a bunch
of lists - some munge r
On 31-Aug-01, Claudio Cicali wrote:
> There is also a famous document about reply-to:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Hmm.. good point, but it says nothing about using from: rather
than reply-to. I guess the same arguments could be applied tho.
Maybe I should just bring my A
At 11:13 AM 8/30/01 +0200, Carl Troein wrote:
>A quick question: How come the mailing list software
>doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
>keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
>I'll try to remember to reply to the list rather than
>directly to the people who ask the que
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:01:35PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> BTW, the list filter is borken. I *have* "sql" in this post, yet
> the filter rejects it anyway.
It probably doesn't check for substrings.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408)
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:21:57PM -0700, Igbar Foosenhopper wrote:
> Thursday, August 30, 2001, 2:13:56 AM, you wrote:
>
> CT> A quick question: How come the mailing list software
> CT> doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
>
> Reply to All seems to work
In mutt ("g" for group-
Hello Carl,
Reply to All seems to work
Thursday, August 30, 2001, 2:13:56 AM, you wrote:
CT> A quick question: How come the mailing list software
CT> doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
CT> keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
CT> I'll try to remember to reply to th
mmediately and can peruse at my leisure.
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "Paul DuBois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Carl Troein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: Reply-to and this list
>
> > A quick question: How come the mailing list software
> > doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
> > keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
I just finished writing a mail list system, so I'll give this a shot.
When the mail list software gets a message in, he has to se
At 11:13 AM +0200 8/30/01, Carl Troein wrote:
>A quick question: How come the mailing list software
>doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
>keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
>I'll try to remember to reply to the list rather than
>directly to the people who ask the que
> A quick question: How come the mailing list software
> doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
> keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
-
Before posting, pl
On Thursday 30 August 2001 04:13 am, Carl Troein wrote:
> A quick question: How come the mailing list software
> doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
> keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
Generally, I hit reply-All, and then just edit the To Line:-)
> I'll try to rem
A quick question: How come the mailing list software
doesn't add a reply-to header? Is this intentional to
keep replies off the mysql list, and if so why?
I'll try to remember to reply to the list rather than
directly to the people who ask the questions, as replying
in private does little to stop
13 matches
Mail list logo
