Re: Robot Replies (WAS: Re: support question (win98_se) (auto))

2003-02-11 Thread Michael T. Babcock
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:11:54PM -0700, Doug Thompson wrote: Am I the only one that equates these robot replies with spam? Most of them are as meaningful as talking to micro$oft. I don't know why they're sent to the list and not to the Sender address. *

Robot Replies (WAS: Re: support question (win98_se) (auto))

2003-02-10 Thread Doug Thompson
Am I the only one that equates these robot replies with spam? Most of them are as meaningful as talking to micro$oft. Yeah, I filter them on input and they go to trash, but silence can be taken as consent which might be construed as endorsement. Who knows what would come next? My $0.02, Doug

RE: Robot Replies (WAS: Re: support question (win98_se) (auto))

2003-02-10 Thread sherzodr
: Am I the only one that equates these robot replies with : spam? Most of : them are as meaningful as talking to micro$oft. : : Yeah, I filter them on input and they go to trash, but : silence can be : taken as consent which might be construed as endorsement. :