Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2004-01-02 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi! Sorry for delayed answer - I was on vacations... On Dec 08, Uros Kotnik wrote: > OK, I will give you more details. > > Table CDS, have 1,053,794 rows, FT index on title, > Data 67,646 KB, Index 70,401 KB > > Table ARTISTS, Rows 292,330, FT on name, > Data 8,096 KB > Index 17,218 KB > > T

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-16 Thread Uros Kotnik
x' ) AND MATCH ( cds.title ) AGAINST ( '2001' ) Regards -Original Message- From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 21:50 To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-12 Thread Uros Kotnik
Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches Uros Kotnik wrote: > It makes sense, but Sergei G. said : > "And are you sure the numbers are correct, the first query - the one > without "IN BOOLEAN MODE"

Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Chuck Gadd
Uros Kotnik wrote: It makes sense, but Sergei G. said : "And are you sure the numbers are correct, the first query - the one without "IN BOOLEAN MODE" - is faster ? I would expect the opposite." I guess that for my DB I can't expect satisfied "in boolena mode" times ? But also when searching wit

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
ld be satisfied with 0.5 - 1 sec. times -Original Message- From: Chuck Gadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 13:17 To: Uros Kotnik; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches Uros Kotnik wrote:

Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Chuck Gadd
Uros Kotnik wrote: Time for first SQL : 21 sec. SELECT artists.name, cds.title, tracks.title FROM artists, cds, tracks WHERE artists.artistid = cds.artistid AND artists.artistid = tracks.artistid AND cds.cdid = tracks.cdid AND MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna'IN BOOLEAN MODE) AND MATCH (cds

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
ds, tracks I get time of 1.9 sec. instead < 1 sec. ? Regards -Original Message- From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02 To: Uros Kotnik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

RE: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-08 Thread Uros Kotnik
cds, tracks I get time of 1.9 sec. instead < 1 sec. ? Regards -Original Message- From: Sergei Golubchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 00:02 To: Uros Kotnik Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text

Re: Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-12-07 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi! On Nov 27, Uros Kotnik wrote: > Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec. > > select artists.name, cds.title, tracks.title from artists, tracks, cds > where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid > and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna') > and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST

Speed difference between boolean full-text searches and full-text searches

2003-11-27 Thread Uros Kotnik
Executing this SQL, takes ~5 sec. select artists.name , cds.title , tracks.title from artists, tracks, cds where artists.artistid = tracks.artistid and cds.cdid = tracks.cdid and MATCH (artists.name) AGAINST ('madonna') and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('music') and MATCH (cds.title) AGAINST ('