ge sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009
> On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
>>> European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
>>> database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball.
>>> Meanwhile
>>> Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
>> European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
>> database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
>> Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2
I believe MySQL will still have great influence in Open Source area.
The better is that MySQL will be a separate Company which has no relation to
Sun and Oracle.
Maybe Oracle can sell MySQL to a 3rd company.
2009/11/11 John Daisley
> What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the u
What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the uncertainty
over the deal is hurting MySQL?
I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was dismissed
completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
going. There were a lot of concerns over where futur
European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
http://www.economist.
>-Original Message-
>From: Olaf Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:13 PM
>To: Peter (MySQL List); MySql
>Subject: [SPAM] - Re: Sun and mysql - Email found in subject
>
>You have a point.
>But,
I guess Ford is not a GM brand.
Just substitute Ford with a GM brand
On 1/17/08 12:23 PM, "Olaf Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I understand the marketing and hype thing.
> I still have a hard time believing that the net worth is actually that high.
> I guess we will see in 10 years or so...
Olaf Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will be interesting to see if facebook, youtube and alike websites will
> ever generate enough earnings to cover the costs they were bought for.
> Just because 50 million people know a website, it does not mean it makes
> money automatically.
The Google m
I understand the marketing and hype thing.
I still have a hard time believing that the net worth is actually that high.
I guess we will see in 10 years or so...
Maybe facebook should by GM, Ford can use some of that hype
On 1/17/08 12:19 PM, "Mark Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf Stein
Olaf Stein wrote:
I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
is probably good for the product itself.
I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
Two words:
> I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
> is probably good for the product itself.
>
> I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly
with
> lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
Much bigger market :-)
A
I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
is probably good for the product itself.
I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
Olaf
On 1/17/08 12:10 PM, "Barry N
> Olaf Stein wrote:
> > I am still amazed by the fact that youtube "is worth" 1.5 billion and
MySQL
> > AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have
way
> > to much many to spend/waste?
> >
> > Greetings from the just wondering...
> > Olaf
> MySQL A.B., so far as I kno
You have a point.
But, facebook makes NO money at this time, has about 400 employees and
Microsoft estimates its values at 15 billion dollars. I simply think this is
nuts. Maybe I am too old with 30, but I have never even been to facebook.
It will be interesting to see if facebook, youtube and ali
Olaf Stein wrote:
I am still amazed by the fact that youtube "is worth" 1.5 billion and MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have way
to much many to spend/waste?
Greetings from the just wondering...
Olaf
MySQL A.B., so far as I know, derives income from trai
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:07:19 -0500
Olaf Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still amazed by the fact that youtube "is worth" 1.5 billion and
> MySQL AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google
> just have way to much many to spend/waste?
>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:36 -060
[snip]
I am still amazed by the fact that youtube "is worth" 1.5 billion and
MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have
way
to much many to spend/waste?
[/snip]
Or that Facebook is 'worth' multiple billions when they do not really
have a way to make money yet.
I am still amazed by the fact that youtube "is worth" 1.5 billion and MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have way
to much many to spend/waste?
Greetings from the just wondering...
Olaf
- Confidentiality Notice:
The fol
Hello:
Does this mean that MySQL is headed for closed source?
re: Sun buys MySQL.
And does it mean that someone may be wanting back licensing
fees?
Just curious, and too lazy to chase down links and stories.
Jeff K
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To
20 matches
Mail list logo
