Hello.
See:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/replication-faq.html
"Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is two-way replication possible with MySQL 5.x? Any good sites / docs
> describing this type of setup?
>
> --
> Chris.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: two-way replication
"Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/2005 11:53:14 AM:
Hi,
Is two-way rep
"Chris Knipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/2005 11:53:14 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Is two-way replication possible with MySQL 5.x? Any good sites / docs
> describing this type of setup?
>
> --
> Chris.
>
>
By "two-way" replication, do you
Hi,
Is two-way replication possible with MySQL 5.x? Any good sites / docs
describing this type of setup?
--
Chris.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication
> > > > lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's little
> > > > gain in having two way
g if anyone is currently working on a two way replication
> > > lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's little
> > > gain in having two way replication but -- I am just curious.
> >
> > What exactly do you mean by two-way replication?
>
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication
> > lock protocol. If so, what&#
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:07:58PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication
> lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's little
> gain in having two way replication but
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone is currently working on a two way replication
lock protocol. If so, what's the status. I understand there's little
gain in having two way replication but -- I am just curious.
If no one is working on it, I may poke at it.
Luis
--
GnuPG Key f
Hello.
On Sat 2002-12-07 at 11:40:28 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have read 4.10.7 and the only caveat stated is that updates can occur
> in different orders on the different servers.
I did not mean to discourage you from using two-way replication. I
just tried to explain (what I b
I have read 4.10.7 and the only caveat stated is that updates can occur
in different orders on the different servers. Each of my updates are
autonomous and that should not be a problem. Are there any other
gotchas I should be concerned about. I saw a posting the stated not to
turn on log-slave-u
Hello.
On Fri 2002-12-06 at 15:35:53 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am new to this list and have not been able to find an answer in the
> searchable archive, So I am sorry if this question has been asked
> before.
>
> The documentation (section 4.10.7) mentions 2 way replication but does
MySQL does not provide conflict resolution mechanism yet. So, although
two-way replication
is theoretically possible, it may cause serious problems, e.g. data
inconsistency between
two servers.
--
Chung Ha-nyung
Sayclub <http://www.sayclub.com>
NeoWiz <http://www.n
I am new to this list and have not been able to find an answer in the
searchable archive, So I am sorry if this question has been asked
before.
The documentation (section 4.10.7) mentions 2 way replication but does
not give any information about how to set it up. I have searched the
documentatio
hello,
i'm new to the list and don't know if this has been discussed before, so
excuse me if repeating.
i have the idea of setting up a two-way replication system with 2 mysql
servers for my radius database.
i need them to act interchangeably:
1. if server1 is alive, all selects a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:09:13AM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>
> After some thinking I've came up with next solution. When both
> servers are up theirs mysqld are setup to have two-way
> replication. Since both servers serve completely independent
> projects and these pr
heirs mysqld are setup to have two-way replication. Since both
servers serve completely independent projects and these projects use
different sets of databases and tables there is should be no conflicts
between two mysqld. In should be look like first mysqld pushes changes
in one set of tables on
17 matches
Mail list logo
