RE: Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-24 Thread Campbell, David
; Sent: 21 February 2003 14:03 > To: Campbell, David > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: Very poor Solaris benchmarks > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:41:40PM -, Campbell, David wrote: > > > Can you identify any major differences in system and/or database

Re: Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-21 Thread Rodolphe Jouannet
Hi, Sorry for my english ;-) I've made some benchs on a SUN v880 with Solaris 8 (4 cpus). I must enable direct IO on the file system whitch support the dataspace (for innodb tables). If not, i've problems with threads (no more instances of mysqld). Why ? i don't know, i just notice it. Best rega

Re: Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-21 Thread Zak Greant
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:41:40PM -, Campbell, David wrote: > > Can you identify any major differences in system and/or database > > tuning? Perhaps you are using default config settings on the new > > server, but tuned settings on the old? > > I have tuned MYSQL using my.cnf settings.

RE: Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-21 Thread Campbell, David
he others are provided by AB to compare. Tuning MYSQL couldn't/shouldn't account from shocking IO performance should it? Dave > -Original Message- > From: Zak Greant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 February 2003 13:24 > To: Campbell, David > Cc: '[EMA

Re: Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-21 Thread Zak Greant
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:38:45PM -, Campbell, David wrote: > MYSQL Ver 8.23 Distrib 3.23.54, > sun-solaris2.8 [binary install] > Sun E4500 > > Hi we have some seriously bad benchmarks for MYSQL performance on a new > cluster - The problem seems to be IO, but the box is doing nothing: Can

Very poor Solaris benchmarks

2003-02-20 Thread Campbell, David
MYSQL Ver 8.23 Distrib 3.23.54, sun-solaris2.8 [binary install] Sun E4500 Hi we have some seriously bad benchmarks for MYSQL performance on a new cluster - The problem seems to be IO, but the box is doing nothing: The first set of results are the benches the second results are from my new mysql