On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:08:26 +0100, "whiskyworld.de"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Hi All,
| >
| > well, since the discussion of the benefits Mysql vs. MSSQL has i've come
| > across a real Problem. Even if its a little bit off-topic (but only a
| little
| > bit...) - perhaps s.b. knows a solutio
Hi,
> we have 3 Tables where new orders are stored (and costumerdates
> etc...) - and 12 tavles where products are in - but how could I
> connect them ? IN MySQL's replication FAQ and Manual its
> only talking about whole servers
you can look at the MySQL documentation regarding replication,
rs order on.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: indrek siitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2001 21:24
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Why I will stay with Microsoft SQL Server
Hi,
> Regarding this situation, is it possible to setup a
Hi,
> Regarding this situation, is it possible to setup a replication on
> the same table between two servers, two way?
> as in
> i modify server a and server b replicates the table change
> i then modify server b and server a replicates the table change
If you're talking about 2 different table
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WG: Why I will stay with Microsoft SQL Server
> Hi All,
>
> well, since the discussion of the benefits Mysql vs. MSSQL has i've
come
> across a real Problem. Even if its a little bit off-topic (but only a
little
> bit...) - perhaps s.b. knows
riginal Message-
From: whiskyworld.de [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WG: Why I will stay with Microsoft SQL Server
> Hi All,
>
> well, since the discussion of the benefits Mysql vs. MSSQL has i've
come
> a
> Hi All,
>
> well, since the discussion of the benefits Mysql vs. MSSQL has i've come
> across a real Problem. Even if its a little bit off-topic (but only a
little
> bit...) - perhaps s.b. knows a solution:
>
> Ok, here we are:
>
> I'm the webmaster of www.whiskyworld.de - an online Store that
