Why change in CONCAT_WS

2003-10-26 Thread Will French
I noticed in the changelog for the upcoming 4.1.1 alpha release that CONCAT_WS is being changed to NOT skip empty strings. I am sure that this must have been done in response to feedback but I wonder if there are others who like me have relied on the skipping of empty strings. Among other

Re: Why change in CONCAT_WS

2003-10-26 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:05:07AM -0500, Will French wrote: Are there others like me who would like to preserve the empty string skipping version of CONCAT_WS. Perhaps the new version of the function could be added under a new name like CONCAT_WS_NOSKIP or perhaps the option to skip blanks