Thanks a lot for your kind and amusing explanation!
I will have a look at MySQL thread layer AND of course wait for kernel
2.6..
Chris Nolan wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 21:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Bakun wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 05:24, Chris Nolan wrote:
3. Wait for a while. Linux 2.6 includes (as does the RedHat 9.0 and
ES/WS/AS 3.0 kernels) NPTL - the Native POSIX Threads for Linux
implementation which is superior in many ways and does not use clone()
at all. As you'll no longer want to use
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:58, Andy Bakun wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 05:24, Chris Nolan wrote:
3. Wait for a while. Linux 2.6 includes (as does the RedHat 9.0 and
ES/WS/AS 3.0 kernels) NPTL - the Native POSIX Threads for Linux
implementation which is superior in many ways and does not use
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 05:14, Chris Nolan wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:58, Andy Bakun wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 05:24, Chris Nolan wrote:
3. Wait for a while. Linux 2.6 includes (as does the RedHat 9.0 and
ES/WS/AS 3.0 kernels) NPTL - the Native POSIX Threads for Linux
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 21:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Bakun wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
does anyone know if it's possible to compile MySQL under Linux so that
mysqld doesn't rely upon LinuxThreads, but makes direct call to fork()
or
Hi all,
does anyone know if it's possible to compile MySQL under Linux so that
mysqld doesn't rely upon LinuxThreads, but makes direct call to fork()
or clone() system calls instead?
I'm looking for a way to avoid the exploitation of pthreads under
Linux.
Is this feature provided by MySQL?
Many
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
does anyone know if it's possible to compile MySQL under Linux so that
mysqld doesn't rely upon LinuxThreads, but makes direct call to fork()
or clone() system calls instead?
As far as I know and can tell from reading docs, Linux's
