Hi ,
a port of Galera Cluster solution and mariadb 5.5.33a has been made available at
https://www.github.com/YannNayn
It compiles on Windows platform using msvc 1600
Feel free to fork it
Comments ,suggestions are welcome
Cheers
Hi every body:
I've a Server with Intel quad Core processor + Wndows 2003 server R2 64
bits, I'm trying to install a myql 5.1 x64 but it shows me that
this installation package is npot supported by this processor type.
Contact your vendor.
What could be happening ?
please help me Urgent
-winx64.msi/from/ftp://mirror.x10.com/mysql/
Install the software.
Regards,
Juan
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Jaime Fuentes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi every body:
I've a Server with Intel quad Core processor + Wndows 2003 server R2 64
bits, I'm trying to install a myql 5.1 x64 but it shows
You may want to excercise your I/O subsystem.
Given that you probably don't want to stomp on a live filesystem, you
might want to create a file of a couple of gigabytes and turn it into
a pseudo-device with
'lofs(1)'.
EG:
# make a 15GB test file
dd if=/dev/zero of=the_testfile bs=1M count=15000
In using drbd 8.0.5 recently, I have come across at least two
instances where a bit on disk apparently flipped spontaneously in the
ext3 metadata on volumes running on top of drbd.
Also, I have been seeing regular corruption of a mysql database,
which runs on top of drbd, and when I reported
On Sep 17, 2007 13:31 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
In using drbd 8.0.5 recently, I have come across at least two
instances where a bit on disk apparently flipped spontaneously in the
ext3 metadata on volumes running on top of drbd.
Also, I have been seeing regular corruption of a mysql
Hi Maurice,
If you're running into corruption both in ext3 metadata and in MySQL
data, it is certainly not he fault of MySQL as you're likely aware.
There are absolutely many places where corruption could occur between
MySQL and the physical bits on disk. The corruption you're seeing does
Hi Maurice,
Do you mean a Serially-Attached SCSI aka SAS controller, I assume?
Is this a custom build machine or a vendor integrated one?
Regards,
Jeremy
Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Sep 17, 2007 13:31 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
In using drbd 8.0.5 recently, I have come across at least
see that there are in fact many bits flipped in each. I
would suspect higher-level corruption than
I initially thought this as well, but the explanation on the ext3
mailing list is that it really is just a lone flipped bit in both
instances. The other differences are due to fsck padding out
sure that the OS
and hardware are stable.
You can see that there are in fact many bits flipped in each. I
would suspect higher-level corruption than
I initially thought this as well, but the explanation on the ext3
mailing list is that it really is just a lone flipped bit in both
instances
I guess I will watch it closely for now and if it trips up again
failover to the drbd peer and see what happens there. I suppose I
could even deattach the local disks and have it run using the peer
over the wire. That should eliminate the local I/O subsystem.
It's kind of scary there is no
I failed over the server and ran a short backup and there were no
didn't compare errors where on the first server, they are there
pretty reliably. I guess this confirms some hardware on the first
server is flipping bits. Essentially, users could have any number of
munged files (most files
I want to use Debian 4.0 x64 with MySQL 64 bits... (5.0 version) and
InnoDB tables
is it safe ?
is it stable ?
is it ready for enterprise production ?
TNKS !
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com
, please, send a email or call me : 21 86391874
Regards,
Juan
On 4/10/07, Dyego Souza Dantas Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use Debian 4.0 x64 with MySQL 64 bits... (5.0 version) and
InnoDB tables
is it safe ?
is it stable ?
is it ready for enterprise production ?
TNKS
Kevin Burton wrote:
A little birdie:
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Top10SQLPerformanceTips
notes..
In 5.1 BOOL/BIT NOT NULL type is 1 bit, in previous versions it's 1 byte.
Is this true?
Hmm, I had wondered about that when someone yelled it out at MySQL Camp...
No, it's not true. The
A little birdie:
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Top10SQLPerformanceTips
notes..
In 5.1 BOOL/BIT NOT NULL type is 1 bit, in previous versions it's 1 byte.
Is this true?
I didn't see a note in the manual..
I assume it would be here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Mariella Di Giacomo wrote:
I have been running MySQL 4.0.5 64 bits on a Sun sun4u sparc
SUNW,Sun-Fire-880, Solaris 2.8.
I have been using the binary version that MySQL provides.
Yesterday I have downloaded the Solaris
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:20:55 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mariella Di Giacomo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: --enable-assembler error and MySQL 64 bits compilation error
on Solaris 2.8
Hello,
I have been running
stopped working. Performance
dropped.
I think it's somewhere not 64-bits clean.
So it would be great if someone from
developers will change this typedef
and see where the problem is.
Yuri.
-
Before posting, please check:
http
Hello,
Can any one tell me in mysql for sorting how many bits it is check
please tell me as soon as possible
Cheers
Umasankar
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual
c cw_1 writes:
Hello,
We have a Stratus HP-UX 64 bits (version B11.0) machine,
I would like to know if MySQL can run on the Stratus Box.
If it can, will it cause any problem?
Can MySQL be configured to the 64 bits to run on the Stratus?
Thanks in advance.
Connie
What HP-UX version
Hello,
We have a Stratus HP-UX 64 bits (version B11.0) machine,
I would like to know if MySQL can run on the Stratus Box.
If it can, will it cause any problem?
Can MySQL be configured to the 64 bits to run on the Stratus?
Thanks in advance.
Connie
In version 3.22.32 I can't get the Invert all bits-function to function. Is it
implemented later or am I doing it all wrong?
I'm trying to do a select ~bitmask from mytable... I've tried with (~bitmask) and a
gazillion other tricks, but only get a syntax error out of it..
Anyone
Hi.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:52:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In version 3.22.32 I can't get the Invert all bits-function to
function. Is it implemented later or am I doing it all wrong?
According to
http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_News.html#News-3.23.x
24 matches
Mail list logo
