Re: power loss scenario

2005-03-30 Thread Brent Baisley
Wow, you are asking a lot, especially since an inexpensive UPS could be had for less than $50. You don't need one to keep the system up for a long time, just long enough for writes to finish. A few minutes should be plenty. I don't see a problem with IDE drives. Your drive access patterns are

Re: power loss scenario

2005-03-30 Thread Renato Golin
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:49, Brent Baisley wrote: Wow, you are asking a lot, especially since an inexpensive UPS could be had for less than $50. You don't need one to keep the system up for a long time, just long enough for writes to finish. A few minutes should be plenty. Yeah, remember

Re: power loss scenario

2005-03-30 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:49:13 -0500, Brent Baisley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, you are asking a lot, especially since an inexpensive UPS could be had for less than $50. You don't need one to keep the system up for a long time, just long enough for writes to finish. A few minutes should be

Re: power loss scenario

2005-03-30 Thread Brent Baisley
If the power is yanked a journaled file system knows exactly what it was doing at the time of failure, what didn't finish, and can recover from any errors caused by the failure. A non-journaled file system would need to run a check to see if everything is ok. This could take a long time on a

power loss scenario

2005-03-29 Thread Florin Andrei
Again the logging server i mentioned before: it's like syslog logging to a DB, lots of INSERTs, perhaps a few SELECTs every now and then, the tables are append-only and are rotated about once a day. For reasons that i am not going to discuss here, the machine has no uninterruptible power supply.