I agree. Don't duplicate posts or post to multiple lists. Jump on
the IRC channel if you need help right away :-)
sorry again, I was not in hurry, but I had a fault on my mailer,
since I was trying to send the post from office and from the wrong
account..
The
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works
even for a cached result?
this is my scenario, (I'm using MyIsam tables)
thread 1:
LOCK TABLE foo WRITE;
thread 2:
SELECT * FROM foo ;
(locked)
thread 1:
UNLOCK TABLES;
thread 2:
result of SELECT * ..
and that's is, IMHO,
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works
even for a cached result?
this is my scenario, (I'm using MyIsam tables)
thread 1:
LOCK TABLE foo WRITE;
thread 2:
SELECT * FROM foo ;
(locked)
thread 1:
UNLOCK TABLES;
thread 2:
result of SELECT * ..
and that's is, IMHO,
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works
even for a cached result?
this is my scenario, (I'm using MyIsam tables)
thread 1:
LOCK TABLE foo WRITE;
thread 2:
SELECT * FROM foo ;
(locked)
thread 1:
UNLOCK TABLES;
thread 2:
result of SELECT * ..
and that's is, IMHO,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, MAS! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works
even for a cached result?
Hold your horses, dude. That's the third time you sent that
email. Someone will give you an answer if you're patient.
If you can't
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, MAS! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works
even for a cached result?
Hold your horses, dude. That's the third time you sent that
MAS! wrote:
does the lock table on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works even
for a cached result?
this is my scenario, (I'm using MyIsam tables)
thread 1:
LOCK TABLE foo WRITE;
thread 2:
SELECT * FROM foo ;
(locked)
thread 1:
UNLOCK TABLES;
thread 2:
result of SELECT * ..
