An update based on my latest fiddling and testing:
a) Right drivers for card with your kernel
b) Proper AGP bus speed and AGP interface driver in use
c) Proper user of openGL sync for retrace
d) Proper settings for deinterlace and, if used, xvmc
e) Proper sound settings and handling of 5.1 sound a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:21:32PM -0500, Paul Leppert wrote:
> On 4/3/05, Brad Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > They include:
> >
> > a) Right drivers for card with your kernel
> > b) Proper AGP bus speed and AGP interface driver in use
> > c) Proper user of openGL sync for
On 4/3/05, Brad Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They include:
>
> a) Right drivers for card with your kernel
> b) Proper AGP bus speed and AGP interface driver in use
> c) Proper user of openGL sync for retrace
> d) Proper settings for deinterlace and, if used, xvmc
> e
On Thursday 07 April 2005 01:37, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 02 April 2005 18:07, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Athlon XP 2600 w/AGP GF4MX, 7174 nvidia driver:
> > -Able to play back 720p, can't remember cpu usage.
>
> About 65%. 50% mythfrontend, 15% X.
>
> > -Able to play back 1080i w/no deint, c
On Saturday 02 April 2005 18:07, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Athlon XP 2600 w/AGP GF4MX, 7174 nvidia driver:
> -Able to play back 720p, can't remember cpu usage.
About 65%. 50% mythfrontend, 15% X.
> -Able to play back 1080i w/no deint, can't remember cpu usage.
Whoops, forgot this one. I wouldn't run
Brad Templeton wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Pete wrote:
I'd like to know what I can do get that kind of performance. I've got an
Athlon XP 3000 (512 MB RAM) and an FX 5200 (AGP) running myth .17 and
FC3 (everything is from atrpms) where HD is close, but not quite. After
a
On Sunday 03 April 2005 21:48, Brad Templeton wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Pete wrote:
> > I'd like to know what I can do get that kind of performance. I've got an
> > Athlon XP 3000 (512 MB RAM) and an FX 5200 (AGP) running myth .17 and
> > FC3 (everything is from atrpms) whe
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2005 08:57, John Kuhn wrote:
is this using Xv or XvMC?
Xv in all cases. I plan to play with XvMC a bit later this week, now that I've
recompiled against the nvidia 7174 XvMC libs...
Let us know if you experience any stability issues with this. I have
trie
On Monday 04 April 2005 08:57, John Kuhn wrote:
> is this using Xv or XvMC?
Xv in all cases. I plan to play with XvMC a bit later this week, now that I've
recompiled against the nvidia 7174 XvMC libs...
> >I've lost track of the thread where I said something about trying a
> > GeForce 6200 in p
Jarod,
This is all GREAT information, especially for folks looking to
purchase/upgrade hardware to use MythTV. Hopefully you'll find time to
organize this, HTML-ize (table format?) it and put if up on your
website. As John Kuhn pointed out, it'd be fantastic if you could re-do
the tests with
--- Brad Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should try to build a list of all the things that
> can go wrong in
> making HD work smoothly. There are many.
>
> They include:
>
>
> a) Right drivers for card with your kernel
> b) Proper AGP bus speed and AGP interface driver
>
is this using Xv or XvMC?
--John
I've lost track of the thread where I said something about trying a GeForce
6200 in place of a GeForce 4 MX with an Athlon XP 1800 system, to see if that
would give any significant playback performance boost with High Definition
recordings. Well, the answer is no
On Sunday 03 April 2005 11:48 pm, Brad Templeton wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Pete wrote:
> > I'd like to know what I can do get that kind of performance. I've got an
> > Athlon XP 3000 (512 MB RAM) and an FX 5200 (AGP) running myth .17 and
> > FC3 (everything is from atrpms)
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Pete wrote:
> I'd like to know what I can do get that kind of performance. I've got an
> Athlon XP 3000 (512 MB RAM) and an FX 5200 (AGP) running myth .17 and
> FC3 (everything is from atrpms) where HD is close, but not quite. After
> a lot of hacking to
Pete wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I've lost track of the thread where I said something about trying a
GeForce 6200 in place of a GeForce 4 MX with an Athlon XP 1800
system, to see if that would give any significant playback
performance boost with High Definition recordings. Well, the answer
is no
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I've lost track of the thread where I said something about trying a GeForce
6200 in place of a GeForce 4 MX with an Athlon XP 1800 system, to see if that
would give any significant playback performance boost with High Definition
recordings. Well, the answer is no, not really,
> What about nvidia 5200 that's not AGP, but rather PCI? I'm getting good
> SD but no dice on HD using a 5200 and an Air2PC both PCI... am I
> somehow swamping the PCI bus?
Probably. The DScaler people (excellent program, BTW) say this about
PCI and video:
--
Can I use any vga card as a display
What about nvidia 5200 that's not AGP, but rather PCI? I'm getting good
SD but no dice on HD using a 5200 and an Air2PC both PCI... am I
somehow swamping the PCI bus? The CPU pegs on HD playback (720 or 1080)
load seems to be split between X and frontend. Video is still quite
blocky and no soun
I've lost track of the thread where I said something about trying a GeForce
6200 in place of a GeForce 4 MX with an Athlon XP 1800 system, to see if that
would give any significant playback performance boost with High Definition
recordings. Well, the answer is no, not really, but a bit of a cpu
19 matches
Mail list logo
