Not to go too far OT but:
I believe large file support is for mencoder writing them, not for
mplayer handling them properly.
On Apr 10, 2005 11:25 AM, Xiaotian Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2005 7:33 AM, Sasha Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's been fixed. I have a das boot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Godshall wrote:
According to Will Dormann,
Graham Dunn wrote:
The problem here isn't so much the samba/nfs decision as the
wireless. In my experience, nfs handles the packet loss you see
in wireless connections much more poorly than SMB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Johnston wrote:
On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern if
on wireless even more than wired
Op zaterdag 09 april 2005 12:03, schreef David Morrison:
Apologies first if this has been asked before but I couldn't find it
in my archives.
Which would be best from a performance viewpoint to stream MythVideo
to my remote frontend?
SMB has a 2GB file limit AFAIK. You'll hit that quite
I think it's been fixed. I have a das boot recording which is 2.8 GB
(director's cut)... and samba has no problem serving it. The downside
is that mplayer doesn't seem to be able to seek a file that flipping
huge. I'll try nfs and see if that works any better with bigass files
like das boot.
On
Well, I just did some testing of NFS vs. samba.
With smb, I got slight pauses throughout the movie when another
machine on the network bothered the samba server. While not a terribly
big deal, it was annoying. Using NFS, everything was buttery smooth.
With smb, movies started faster. This is
On Apr 10, 2005 7:33 AM, Sasha Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's been fixed. I have a das boot recording which is 2.8 GB
(director's cut)... and samba has no problem serving it. The downside
is that mplayer doesn't seem to be able to seek a file that flipping
huge. I'll try nfs and see
Xiaotian Sun wrote:
On Apr 10, 2005 7:33 AM, Sasha Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's been fixed. I have a das boot recording which is 2.8 GB
(director's cut)... and samba has no problem serving it. The downside
is that mplayer doesn't seem to be able to seek a file that flipping
huge. I'll
Well, it isn't like mplayer doesn't play them. It does. It just
doesn't behave as well as it could. I'll look into those options
anyway though. :)
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
On Sunday 10 April 2005 5:06 am, Henk Poley wrote:
Op zaterdag 09 april 2005 12:03, schreef David Morrison:
Apologies first if this has been asked before but I couldn't find it
in my archives.
Which would be best from a performance viewpoint to stream MythVideo
to my remote frontend?
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 08:48 +0100, David Morrison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Johnston wrote:
On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apologies first if this has been asked before but I couldn't find it
in my archives.
Which would be best from a performance viewpoint to stream MythVideo
to my remote frontend?
I'm currently using Samba and it's working OK over my 802.11g network,
Yes, it is the preferred networking method between multiple linux
boxes. Samba will work, but has some overhead that you may see a
difference with if you were to give NFS a run. NFS has other benefits
as well, but my guess is you really only care about the speed and
efficiency of getting your
On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern
if on wireless even more than wired because it does not
require physical access.
Oh for pete's sake.
Someone is worried about efficiency enough to think about
abandoning
On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern
if on wireless even more than wired because it does not
require physical access.
Oh for pete's sake.
According to Robert Johnston,
On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote:
Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern
if on wireless even more than wired because it does not
require physical
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:03:35AM +0100, David Morrison wrote:
Which would be best from a performance viewpoint to stream MythVideo
to my remote frontend?
I'm currently using Samba and it's working OK over my 802.11g network,
but only OK. I've never used NFS before and wondered if this was
Graham Dunn wrote:
The problem here isn't so much the samba/nfs decision as the wireless.
In my experience, nfs handles the packet loss you see in wireless
connections much more poorly than SMB does.
I'm no expert on the subject, but from what I've read if you set up NFS
to use TCP rather than
I did some reading up on this a while back and everyone I talked to
sugjestted if you connecting Linux to Linux, you want NFS. If your
connecting to a linux box from a windows box, you want Samba.
Not all linux distro's have NFS compiled into the core. Fedora core 3 does.
Hope this helps.
On Saturday 09 April 2005 4:10 pm, Brent McGuire wrote:
I did some reading up on this a while back and everyone I talked to
sugjestted if you connecting Linux to Linux, you want NFS. If your
connecting to a linux box from a windows box, you want Samba.
Yes, that's the often mouthed
According to Will Dormann,
Graham Dunn wrote:
The problem here isn't so much the samba/nfs decision as the wireless.
In my experience, nfs handles the packet loss you see in wireless
connections much more poorly than SMB does.
I'm no expert on the subject, but from what I've read if you set
21 matches
Mail list logo
