On 12/31/05, Brad DerManouelian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 31, 2005, at 12:29 PM, Steve Adeff wrote:
I'd still think it would be worth paying the $500 for a UPS for
that system,
save yourself the hassle of a power outtage destroying some of
those drives.
Happened to me once and
On Thursday 29 December 2005 23:21, Robert Johnston wrote:
On 12/29/05, Buechler, Mark R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that would be optimal. My raid5 is on an HP SC10 with 5 Seagate
181gig drives plugged into a Linux server acting as a SAN server to 7
initiators. That SAN server has
On Dec 31, 2005, at 12:29 PM, Steve Adeff wrote:
I'd still think it would be worth paying the $500 for a UPS for
that system,
save yourself the hassle of a power outtage destroying some of
those drives.
Happened to me once and thats why I use a UPS now =)
Speaking of APC... I might have a
Please see my original post. Basically, my recordings directory is a huge
raid5 array which when syncing can't be used to record. That I can get past
I'd like to suggest the obvious solution since it hasn't yet been mentioned: Don't use RAID5 for storing your TV programs.
Sure, you'll lose
On 12/30/05, Chris Ribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see my original post. Basically, my recordings directory is a huge
raid5 array which when syncing can't be used to record. That I can get past
I'd like to suggest the obvious solution since it hasn't yet been mentioned: Don't use RAID5 for
Can you explain where in the new mythtv-setup that option is? I'm talking
about the later SVN versions. I believe you're talking about .18 and prior.
- Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Burks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:52 AM
To: Discussion about
On 12/29/05, Buechler, Mark R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you explain where in the new mythtv-setup that option is? I'm talking
about the later SVN versions. I believe you're talking about .18 and prior.
Your correct. I haven't played with svn in a few months. Did
mythtv-setup change that
Your correct. I haven't played with svn in a few months. Did
mythtv-setup change that much?
LiveTV recordings are treated pretty much like regular recordings
and are stored in the same location as regular recordings. there is no more
seperate buffer location.
like a hack.
- Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Estabrooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:56 AM
To: Discussion about mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Serious concerns about LiveTV Ringbuffer chang
es - a Q for develo pers
Your correct. I haven't
That leaves me with having to enlarge my old live tv buffer, using it as my
recordings directory and coming up with a scheduled process which moved real
Why ? Think of it this way, the old LiveTV buffer no longer exists. LiveTV and
regular recordings go to the same place that regular
the bandwidth
required for an HD stream (DVB).
- Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Estabrooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:18 PM
To: Discussion about mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Serious concerns about LiveTV Ringbuffer chang
es - a Q for develo pers
On Thursday 29 December 2005 21:22, Buechler, Mark R wrote:
Please see my original post. Basically, my recordings directory is a huge
raid5 array which when syncing can't be used to record. That I can get
past. Now now I have the added problem of also not being able to watch TV
until the sync
.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Adeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:05 PM
To: mythtv-users@mythtv.org
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Serious concerns about LiveTV Ringbuffer chang
es - a Q for develo pers
On Thursday 29 December 2005 21:22, Buechler, Mark R
On 12/29/05, Buechler, Mark R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that would be optimal. My raid5 is on an HP SC10 with 5 Seagate 181gig
drives plugged into a Linux server acting as a SAN server to 7 initiators.
That SAN server has roughly 2TB of raw storage hooked up to it. Keep the
server and all
about LiveTV Ringbuffer chang
es - a Q for develo pers
On 12/29/05, Buechler, Mark R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that would be optimal. My raid5 is on an HP SC10 with 5 Seagate
181gig
drives plugged into a Linux server acting as a SAN server to 7 initiators.
That SAN server has roughly 2TB
15 matches
Mail list logo
