On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 04:17 am, Kelly wrote:
> On 6/25/05, Allan Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kelly wrote:
> > > Think I've found a source of my constant crashing. I have a Maxtor
> > > SATA 250GB drive. I started poking around google and came up with the
> > > hdparm test. I ran it and go
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:22:02 -0500, Trey Boudreau wrote:
> The wife has given me the go-ahead to build a new storage system (the
> current 750GB array has topped out with HDTV programs, and I haven't
> made a significant dent in the DVD library transfer process). I've
> planned a dual Opteron 246
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Allan Stirling wrote:
>
> Here's the results from my array, which is a 8 disk RAID5, spread over 2
> SATA controllers on a PCI-X dual Xeon (yes, I believe overkill _is_ just
> a word):
>
Sweet setup. I don't believe you've reached overkill yet ;-)
> h
On 6/25/05, Allan Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kelly wrote:
> > Think I've found a source of my constant crashing. I have a Maxtor
> > SATA 250GB drive. I started poking around google and came up with the
> > hdparm test. I ran it and got
> >
> > Timing cached reads: 816 MB in 2.01 seco
On Jun 25, 2005, at 8:41 AM, Allan Stirling wrote:
No. It's a semi-hardware RAID5
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA/rr1820a.htm
9 disks, 1 as hot-spare.
What does 'semi-hardware' mean? From my job I'm familure with high
end hardware SCSI RAID solutions like the IBM ServeRAID 6M
controller
Greg wrote:
Ummm... No. You're reading the results wrongly, I'm afraid :)
I would seriously doubt you'd see 1.5Gb / sec outside the datacentre.
150Mb / sec... _maybe_.
Cached reads are just that - It reads the same sector over and over.
This means it's already in drive's read cache. So what yo
Greg wrote:
Ummm... No. You're reading the results wrongly, I'm afraid :)
I would seriously doubt you'd see 1.5Gb / sec outside the datacentre.
150Mb / sec... _maybe_.
Cached reads are just that - It reads the same sector over and over.
This means it's already in drive's read cache. So what y
> Ummm... No. You're reading the results wrongly, I'm afraid :)
> I would seriously doubt you'd see 1.5Gb / sec outside the datacentre.
> 150Mb / sec... _maybe_.
>
> Cached reads are just that - It reads the same sector over and over.
> This means it's already in drive's read cache. So what you'
Kelly wrote:
Think I've found a source of my constant crashing. I have a Maxtor
SATA 250GB drive. I started poking around google and came up with the
hdparm test. I ran it and got
Timing cached reads: 816 MB in 2.01 seconds
A respectable IDE drive and do 3000mb in 2.00 seconds.
So my driv
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:54:06PM -0700, Kelly wrote:
>
> Think I've found a source of my constant crashing. I have a Maxtor
> SATA 250GB drive. I started poking around google and came up with the
> hdparm test. I ran it and got
>
> Timing cached reads: 816 MB in 2.01 seconds
>
> A respecta
On 6/24/05, PAUL WILLIAMSON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might still be covered under manufacturers warranty.
> A 250 SATA isn't all that old. Not really all that expensive
> either - I just picked one up the other day for $99.
>
> Paul
Before I go off and get another HD. What is a good stabl
It might still be covered under manufacturers warranty.
A 250 SATA isn't all that old. Not really all that expensive
either - I just picked one up the other day for $99.
Paul
>>> Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/24/05 10:54 PM >>>
Think I've found a source of my constant crashing. I have a Maxtor
S
12 matches
Mail list logo
