Re: [Nagios-users] Duplicate host alerts

2008-05-01 Thread Eli Klein
Already got one response to this effect.. unfortunately, there is definitely only one nagios process running and it's current (if I stop/start nagios there's only the newest nagios process running). It certainly is behaving as though there are two processes running though. On Thu, May 1, 2008 at

Re: [Nagios-users] Duplicate host alerts

2008-05-01 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eli Klein > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 4:49 PM > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Nagios-users] Duplicate host alerts > > I'm running nagios 3.0.1. When a host goes

[Nagios-users] Duplicate host alerts

2008-05-01 Thread Eli Klein
I'm running nagios 3.0.1. When a host goes down, I get two host alerts instead of one: Number 1: --- -Original Message- From: Nagios Role Account Sent: Thu 5/1/08 3:24 PM To: Eli Klein Subject: ** PROBLEM Host Alert: cots027 is DOWN ** * Nagios * Notification Type:

Re: [Nagios-users] Monitor a Linux Machine

2008-05-01 Thread Scott Miller
Thanks everyone for your help. /usr/local/nagios/bin/nagios -v /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg really is my best friend. Found all the errors, and now it's happy. Thanks for all the help. Scott Miller -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[Nagios-users] (no subject)

2008-05-01 Thread steven craig
Hello all, I am a new poster to the nagios mailing list; however, I have used nagios for a number of years now. I am having an issue where the status and extinfo CGIs stop updating. Our west coast nagios setup consists of one physical master server, and one physical slave server.

Re: [Nagios-users] Monitor a Linux Machine

2008-05-01 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Miller > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:43 PM > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Nagios-users] Monitor a Linux Machine > > I have nagios 3.x installed as per the

Re: [Nagios-users] No notification on hard state change afteranacknowledgement

2008-05-01 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:19 PM > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] No notification on hard state change > afteranacknowledgeme

[Nagios-users] Monitor a Linux Machine

2008-05-01 Thread Scott Miller
I have nagios 3.x installed as per the quick install guide, and it seems to be working fine with the default config, looking only at localhost. Server: Fedora Core 4 I'm having a bit of trouble setting it up to monitor another Linux machine. I've read the docs, and it said to: 1. Create a Host

Re: [Nagios-users] No notification on hard state change afteranacknowledgement

2008-05-01 Thread Jim . Melin
I have a sort of related question The default for acknowledgements is sticky, notifiy and persistant are all checked. Is there a way to change the behaviour so that sticky is not checked by default? We have a few services that if they go in to warning, the area in charge of them doesn't wa

[Nagios-users] Question on Escalations

2008-05-01 Thread Lehman, John
Hello all, I have a quick question on escalations. (The question is at the end of the email) The following is how I have my hosts.cfg file configured. # Generic host definition template define host{ namegeneric-host6 ; The name of this host template - referen

[Nagios-users] Chan, Brian is out of the office.

2008-05-01 Thread Brian Chan
I will be out of the office starting 05/01/2008 and will not return until 05/05/2008. - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $

Re: [Nagios-users] No notification on hard state change afteranacknowledgement

2008-05-01 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:16:00PM -0500, Marc Powell wrote: > From: Scott Gwartney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank you for your response, but isn't a change from "Warning" to > > "Critical" a hard state change? > > Man, today is the day of repeats, I've got to learn to be clearer or > make few

Re: [Nagios-users] nagios npre

2008-05-01 Thread kyle . odonnell
if you use sudo to execute the reboot command sure. On 5/1/08, Ange Olivier AMBEMOU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all > > i am new to nagios and i want to know if is possible to use nagios to reboot > on pc or service with command check_something, i see check_npre can be use > to make check for

[Nagios-users] nagios npre

2008-05-01 Thread Ange Olivier AMBEMOU
hi all i am new to nagios and i want to know if is possible to use nagios to reboot on pc or service with command check_something, i see check_npre can be use to make check for a remote box . help me please. __ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le sp

Re: [Nagios-users] Fwd: MRTG Graf

2008-05-01 Thread Israel Brewster
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Devinder Singh wrote: Hi How do i get the following log file 192.168.1.253_1.log i which directory is that log file found I only get a log file in var/log.mrtg.log Pls advise Devinder The location that MRTG uses for your log files is defined in your mrtg.cfg

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 2.5 > 3.x Any issues

2008-05-01 Thread Tom Brown
> http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/upgrading.html#nagios2x > > That should answer any questions you have about the upgrade. (you may > need to copy and paste the link depending on your mail client) > great thanks -

[Nagios-users] Nagios 2.5 > 3.x Any issues

2008-05-01 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I will be deploying a clustered setup as previously mentioned and we are on version 2.5 with our current setup - Is the 2.5 to 3.x migration pretty painless? thanks - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > Hari Sekhon wrote: > | Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > |> Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for > |> yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos > 4 here. > |> > |> Hugo. > |> > | Is it that the information is not av

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hari Sekhon wrote: | Hugo van der Kooij wrote: |> Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for |> yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos 4 here. |> |> Hugo. |> | Is it that the information is not

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Tom Brown wrote: >> Did you add yum manually to RHEL 4 and if so, what implications are >> there for updates then, is there any official repo for that, or only >> 3rd party. If 3rd party, do they support security information support >> for yum? Otherwise you'd have to use --all-updates or >> --

Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring software RAID in Debian GNU/Linux

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Daniel, Could you pls try with the latest version 0.7 on nagiosexchange and let us know if you still have any problem with it? Thanks -h Daniel Guillermo Bareiro wrote: > Hi Hari! > > >>> [ About plugin check_md_raid.pl ] >>> > > >>> I have noticed when removing a member from

Re: [Nagios-users] Cluster setup

2008-05-01 Thread Peter Edmonds
> I will shortly be configuring a couple of nagios hosts in a cluster > setup, most likely active/passive, and i wonder if there are 'best > practices' for this? I will most likely be setting up for redundancy as > opposed 'performance' > > I have things like NFS from a Netapp available to me

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for > yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos 4 here. > > Hugo. > Is it that the information is not available on CentOS 4 or that the yum-security plugin is just not inst

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Tom Brown
> > > Did you add yum manually to RHEL 4 and if so, what implications are > there for updates then, is there any official repo for that, or only > 3rd party. If 3rd party, do they support security information support > for yum? Otherwise you'd have to use --all-updates or > --warn-on-any-updat

Re: [Nagios-users] Cluster setup

2008-05-01 Thread kyle . odonnell
I have nagios on an nfs mount and share between 2 servers. Remember to point the entire var directory to local disk (performance reasons, and because the nagios command pipe wont work over nfs). Monitor the primary server from the secondary server via cron (run check_nrpe/check_by_ssh check_nagi

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hari Sekhon wrote: | Tom Brown wrote: |>> This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't |>> have any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS |>> shipped with yum for this to be useful. |>> |>> Since you have made a g

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Tom Brown wrote: > >> >> This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't >> have any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS >> shipped with yum for this to be useful. >> >> Since you have made a good case, I have now updated the plugin to >> have compatibility

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Tom Brown
> > This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't have > any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS shipped with > yum for this to be useful. > > Since you have made a good case, I have now updated the plugin to have > compatibility for the older python 2.3,

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hari Sekhon wrote: > | Randal, Phil wrote: > |> The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes. > |> > |> Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check > |> our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes.

[Nagios-users] Cluster setup

2008-05-01 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I will shortly be configuring a couple of nagios hosts in a cluster setup, most likely active/passive, and i wonder if there are 'best practices' for this? I will most likely be setting up for redundancy as opposed 'performance' I have things like NFS from a Netapp available to me so would

Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring HP arrays on windows with Nagios

2008-05-01 Thread Valdinger, Stephen (DOV, MSX)
http://www.nagiosexchange.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?d=1&query=hp+array&Go=G o (you may need to copy and paste the link to get it to work depending on your mail editor) -HTH Stephen Valdinger MIS Helpdesk Coordinator 330.365.3622 -O 740.491.0958 - C [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Nobody move...I d

[Nagios-users] Monitoring HP arrays on windows with Nagios

2008-05-01 Thread Steven Relf
Hi Guys, Any one got any tips on how to accomplish this? Rgds Steve. - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use

[Nagios-users] Nagios does not send service recovery messages

2008-05-01 Thread Cem Vedat ISIK
Dear all, I've been using Nagios v2.9 to monitor the HTTP service of a host. When the HTTP Service is in CRITICAL state I and my friends receive "Service Critical Notification" SERVICE NOTIFICATION: cvisik;webserver;Check webserver;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 5 second

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Randal, Phil
Oops, I realised after I said it. The only time I used yum on RHEL 4 was to upgrade it to CentOS 4. CentOS 4, of course, ships with yum. I've currently got 4 CentOS 4.6 boxes, 2 CentOS 5.1, and 1 RHEL 4 box, so python 2.3 support would still be a plus. Phil -- Phil Randal Networks Engineer He

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hari Sekhon wrote: | Randal, Phil wrote: |> The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes. |> |> Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check |> our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes. |> |> Cheers, |> |> Phil | I have a couple

Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

2008-05-01 Thread Hari Sekhon
Randal, Phil wrote: > The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes. > > Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check > our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes. > > Cheers, > > Phil I have a couple of RHEL 4 boxes too but since they didn't ship with yum this didn't seem so