Good morning List
Apologies for posting such a dumb question but I cannot seem to find a
definitve answer:
I am monitoring sip connections from a session border controller to our various
providers.
The normal check times are too short and causing us to receive an excessive
amounts of "critica
> Easy enough to verify though. In your recent maillog, do you see
> submission by nagios and then delivery by postfix for all those
> messages or just the delivery by postfix?
Thank you for your detailed explanation. You were correct in all aspects. :)
Cheers,
Eugene
--
Please always respond on list. More below --
On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
>> Nagios doesn't queue alerts. They're handed to the mail system in
>> real
>> time. If the mail system doesn't accept them, they're gone forever.
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> I could be wrong, but this doesn'
Possible. I stopped Nagios and ps ax revealed no more running after a few
seconds. Once I start it up again I see multiple Nagios.cfg running for
numerous active checks that are going on.
I see several Notifications in the Nagios.log file. The two that I received
at midnight as well as the few Cri
On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Kevin Davison wrote:
> Clearly I’m missing something. I would appreciate any advice.
Multiple nagios daemons perhaps? Definitely some oddness. Do you see
the notifications in nagios.log?
--
Marc
---
I've just started a new job and naturally Nagios was the first order of
business. Having lived with Nagios for over 4 years I felt naked without it.
I have Nagios 3 up and running on an openSUSE 11.1 Virtual Machine with
postfix relaying through an onsite SMTP server. Everything has been working
pe
Keep in mind that if you measure collision rates on the host and on the
network device, you are really measuring two very different things
(unless you really have a hub rather than a switch); it's not a choice
about where to measure the data, but rather about what, exactly, you are
interested i
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> Is there a specific alerts queue flush feature that I could perform to
> ensure this doesn't happen again?
Nagios doesn't queue alerts. They're handed to the mail system in real
time. If the mail system doesn't accept them, they're gone for
Greetings,
I had a test nagios 3 installation running, with postfix disabled,
logging and attempting to send weeks worth of warnings and criticals.
The moment I enabled postfix on this machine (without restarting
nagios) I was immediately mailbombed by the backlogged alerts.
Is there a specific a
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM, SYS ADMIN wrote:
> I have managed to monitor all my HP Laserjet printers using check_hpjd.
> I have several networked Canon copier/printers on my LAN, and can't seem
> to get any response back from them, although snmp is installed, and I
> try check_snmp.
> Does a
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Conor Shovlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a ubuntu server and installed nagios to test our
> configuration on a new version of linux other than Fedora
>
> We have the same problem in that we cannot add more than 226 hosts
> and we get the below error
>
> Process
Hi,
I installed a ubuntu server and installed nagios to test our configuration on a
new version of linux other than Fedora
We have the same problem in that we cannot add more than 226 hosts and we get
the below error
Processing object config file '/usr/local/nagios/etc/objects/.cfg'.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, SYS ADMIN wrote:
> I have managed to monitor all my HP Laserjet printers using check_hpjd.
> I have several networked Canon copier/printers on my LAN, and can't seem
> to get any response back from them, although snmp is installed, and I
> try check_snmp.
> Does an
I have managed to monitor all my HP Laserjet printers using check_hpjd.
I have several networked Canon copier/printers on my LAN, and can't seem
to get any response back from them, although snmp is installed, and I
try check_snmp.
Does anyone have any experience/idea what to do?
I can't seem to eve
I rebooted the nagios server and that fixed it.
thanks a lot
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:14 PM, wrote:
> Marc,
>
> As you said, correct. I have multiple nagios daemons running on the host.
> How do I get rid of this?
>
> I tried,
>
> killall -9 nagios
>
> service nagios start
>
> [r...@lnx-nagios
Marc,
As you said, correct. I have multiple nagios daemons running on the host.
How do I get rid of this?
I tried,
killall -9 nagios
service nagios start
[r...@lnx-nagios local]# ps -ef | grep nagios
nagios2672 1 0 19:23 ?00:00:01 /usr/local/nagios/bin/nagios
-d /usr/local/nag
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Marc Powell wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
> Errors, I would say yes; collisions, maybe.
Unfortunately collision counters are not a part of the IF-MIB that 99%
of the SNMP agents support out of the box; switches all support
collision count
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Max wrote:
> MIB, would love to know if there is one as the ETHERLIKE MIB also
> exposes duplex settings for host-based interfaces .. and if we had
I should drink caffeine before i type. Not host-based interfaces,
just network interfaces.
- Max
-
On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:28 AM, asa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using check_ping to checking the status of server (up or down).
> we have two nagios servers (one at production site, USA and another
> one at DEV site, India). I am now monitoring some of the network
> devices (using p
On Jul 23, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
> any way we can monitor for collisions and errors on host interfaces
> rather than doing this on the switch?
Errors, I would say yes; collisions, maybe.
ifInErrors and ifOutErrors is pretty standard SNMP. If you install an
snmp daemon on the host
If you are using a vendpor-specific host agent like dell openmanage or
hp insight manager it will send snmp traps when a disk is removed or
added; these traps can be received by snmptrapd, filtereed by SNMPTT
and then submitted to Nagios as assive checks..
We use this extensively though we do not
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:43 AM, keshav murthy wrote:
> Objective:
> Is Nagios capable of re-scanning the disk drives or recognize if
> there are newly added disks/removed disks from existing servers that
> are being monitored in Nagios.
I am assuming that these are linux/unix-like hosts. If you
Hi All,
I am using check_ping to checking the status of server (up or down). we have
two nagios servers (one at production site, USA and another one at DEV site,
India). I am now monitoring some of the network devices (using ping) resides
at USA from Nagios server located in India. All I am gettin
any way we can monitor for collisions and errors on host interfaces
rather than doing this on the switch?
thanks
--
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge
> Objective:
> Is Nagios capable of re-scanning the disk drives or recognize if
> there are newly added disks/removed disks from existing servers that
> are being monitored in Nagios.
No, that's not possible out-of-the-box and I cannot imagine
anyone working on something like this - it's just not
25 matches
Mail list logo
