ReynierPM wrote:
> Morris, Patrick wrote:
>
>> ReynierPM wrote:
>>
>> check_by_ssh does host key checking, and if one does not exist or it
>> does not match what's in Nagios's known_hosts file, it will fail.
>>
>> The easy fix would be to SSH from the Nagios box to each of those hosts
>> manua
Hi
We have an esx pool of about 120 VMs, and about 4-5 service checks per vm
(disk/stock web/ssh/ldap/ssl certificate expiry/tomcat web apps/etc etc). The
nagios monitor (also a vm) hits them all.
Only ‘unique’ issue we have since the vms are in a really aggressive load
balancer, outages in ne
I would be very very wary of running Nagios on a VM (we use VMware here). The
reason for this is Clock Skew.
Clock Skew causes the virtual clock on the guest OS to lag behind then skip
forward depending on the loading and sleep times of the guest. Note that this
will not affect 'Para-virtuali
This definitely a question of scale. I suspect a virtual solution could
support a couple thousand services or even more in a distributed
environment. For a smaller environment it would be a no-brainer.
We virtualize everything by default so the next nagios server will go
virtual in our MS Hyper-
Has anyone had an opportunity or need to monitor the performance of
Cisco's ACE using Nagios typically via SNMP Get commands?
If so would you mind sharing your experiences, settings and impressions
please?
Thx, Stuart
---
Morris, Patrick wrote:
> ReynierPM wrote:
>
> check_by_ssh does host key checking, and if one does not exist or it
> does not match what's in Nagios's known_hosts file, it will fail.
>
> The easy fix would be to SSH from the Nagios box to each of those hosts
> manually as the Nagios user, using
This was a year or two ago, but we found that when we ran Nagios in this way it
worked in general, but because of the sort of variable size of a second on
VMware, the latencies were kind of screwed up. This was clearly evidenced when
we looked at the performance statistics. Nagios indicated th
Kevin Holleran wrote:
> I am grouping a series of servers together (for example, all File and
> Print Servers). I remember seeing in a post someone mentioning
> wildcards for setting up monitoring. Can I define all the servers in
> a cfg file, and then set up a single monitor to cover all servers
Kevin Holleran escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I am grouping a series of servers together (for example, all File and
> Print Servers). I remember seeing in a post someone mentioning
> wildcards for setting up monitoring. Can I define all the servers in
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am grouping a series of servers together (for example, all File and
Print Servers). I remember seeing in a post someone mentioning
wildcards for setting up monitoring. Can I define all the servers in
a cfg file, and then set up a single mon
Hi Juki,
No problems here, either.
OpenSuSe on Vmware ESX.
regards from Hamburg
cheers
Leif
-Original Message-
From: Christian Schneemann [mailto:cschneem...@suse.de]
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 13:03
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Installing
Hi,
On Thursday November 12 2009 12:42:47 pm Juki wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I would like to know if it is advisable (or best practice) to install and
> run a Nagios monitoring server on a virtual machine (in this case, with
> OpenSuSE as the OS) with
> the intention of monitoring physical hardwar
Hello people,
I would like to know if it is advisable (or best practice) to install and
run a Nagios monitoring server on a virtual machine (in this case, with
OpenSuSE as the OS) with
the intention of monitoring physical hardware client machines on the same
LAN.
If so, what known issues should I
13 matches
Mail list logo
