If it helps, all Duration times show as "???", even for checks I just
forced and have the times back in sync.
--
- Kyle
-
ky...@panix.com http://www.panix.com/~kylet
-
-
>
> I don't have log rotation on.
Apparently it's on by default, but that date's good as well.
[10-04-2009 00:00:00] LOG VERSION: 2.0
Log Rotation
[10-04-2009 00:00:00] LOG ROTATION: WEEKLY
--
- Kyle
-
ky...@panix.com http://www.panix.com/~kylet
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:24:21AM -0700, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Just to be sure, is that true for the earliest lines at midnight the
> day you discovered the problem?
I discovered it today and just looked back through a week of archives and dates
are right on. I don't have log rotation on.
Log F
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:34:39AM -0700, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:30:19AM -0400, Kyle Tucker wrote:
> >
> > check until October of 2014!. I saw this for all services
> > with the last check having been the same year. The system
> > clock is
Hi all,
Today when I noticed a root nearly full I looked to see
why Nagios hadn't flagged it. It was quickly apparent
when I saw Nagios wasn't going to run the next service
check until October of 2014!. I saw this for all services
with the last check having been the same year. The system
clock is
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Arnau wrote:
> Do you know if there is a way to force Nagios to send a notification
> periodically?
I'd try here with an external command.
http://www.nagios.org/developerinfo/externalcommands/commandinfo.php?command_id=135
--
- Kyle
-
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:43:37PM -0300, Fernando Rocha wrote:
> Probably you have the 'contact_groups' variable at the host definition, and
> it will be implicitly inherite.
>
> take a look at 'Implied Inheritance' from
> http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/objectinheritance.html
I just n
Hi all,
I have defined a custom service notification command that I am using to
send alerts to CA Spectrum. That part is working, but for every alert I
send, I am also getting a corresponding service notification by email to
the nagiosadmins contact group despite my service having an inherited
>
>"Is it possible for a single service instance to send an e-mail
> on a WARNING condition and a page plus e-mail on a CRITICAL condition?"
>
>Would this require two separate service instances with different
> "notification_options"? I'd really like to avoid having two service
> definit
> it is being discussed here again and again. Some working solution(s) attached.
For the simpler situations, wouldn't the introduction of a simple host
retry_check_interval be sufficient? It would fulfill my request and of
the OP it would seem as well.
--
- Kyle
---
>
> What is the point of setting a Host max_check_attempts if Nagios isn't going
> to
> wait in between checking?
I too wish I had more time between host checks and you've prompted me
to try something in my check_alive script. Would this snippet do the
trick?
TIMEGAP=10 # number of seconds be
r info, =
> there's a pending-confirmation fix in CVS as well as a workaround (move =
> your status.dat file back to the same filesystem).
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Tucker
> Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 8:39 AM
> To: Nagios Mailing List
> Subje
Hi,
Nagios 2.0b5 on Solaris 10. I've been running this
setup for some time and just recently started seeing "Internal
Server Error" on page refreshes from Firefox, with Apache
reporting "Premature end of script headers". The only changes
recently are that I increased the host and servi
Hi,
I modified my host-notify-by-email command
to include a line to indicate how long a host had
been down. When I saw it come out in this HOST UP
recovery notification as zero seconds, some quick
further reading shed light on why. I know this will
be useful for re-notification of hosts t
> > > for that service. Ergo, if you set your service checks max to 15, after
> > > 15 minutes (assuming your delay is 60 seconds) your service will hit a
> > > HARD CRITICAL, and host checks will fire.
> >
> > That's not correct, host checks are performed as soon as a service check
> > returns so
to avoid doing a host check until absolutely necessary.
> Suggest increasing the max_check_attempts on the SERVICE to a larger number,
> this will avoid impacting the monitoring system as a whole.
>
> /eli
>
>
> On 5/22/06 11:45 AM, "Kyle Tucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have many hosts that are constantly giving me DOWN/UP state as they
are unreachable for certain periods. In an attempt to give the system more
time to become available, I increased the max_check_attempts from 2 to 5. At
2 the interval between retry attempts was 10 seconds. Now at 5, t
Hi all,
I have modified my notifications command such that
it checks that if $NOTIFICATIONTYPE = "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT"
then I am kicking off a couple actions; a snmpget and then
an external Nagios command to submit the service check. But
it runs the notification command for each recipient and
> I want to be able to send an SMMP check straight to critical instead of
> warning. I.e. a Wireless AP Interface has UP and Down. So instead of
> sending that to a Warning status I would like it to go straight to
> Critical. I have tried using the check_snmp string, however it requires
> a
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, ThomasC. wrote:
>
> > I would like to use eventhandlers to restart apache on nagios server
> > because
> > it sometimes fails.
> > My issue is that i have a password on the certificate that i have to give
> > when restarting apache...do you know how i can handle this ?
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 10:11:27AM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> > An active check is one in which the host or service check_command is run
> > by nagios itself. You can force an active check to happen by
> > re-scheduling the next check of the service.
> > A passive check is one in which the hos
Hi,
I'm missing something here. In the extinfo.cgi page,
all my active service checks on my central server have a link
to submit "passive" service checks, which actually allow me to
change the state of service checks and I assume the external
command for this is PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESUL
I've set up a distributed server with freshness checks
for each service being submitted passively set to 1 on
the central server. But in the main nagios.cfg on each
server (central and distributed), what should the global
check_service_freshness parameter be set to? I don't see
anything definitiv
Hi,
At out colocation site, the systems I am monitoring
have two border routers by which they can get out, so both
of these would need to be down for me to not want to monitor
hosts and services beyond these. Is this where comma separated
parent hosts would come into play? If not, how woul
Trying to debug this with gdb didn't help as it acts properly using
gdb. Why would this happen?
Program exited normally.
(gdb) run check_snmp -u "load average" -t 3 -P 3 -H 192.168.2.1 -L authPriv -U
xx -a MD5 -A yy -X zz -o laLoad.2
Starting program: /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check
Hi,
If I use check_snmp to get the load from Net-SNMP's load
directives, all comes back fine until I set -w or -c option. When
I use these options, everything after the decimal point gets cut
off. If I leave off the options, I get the full numeric value.
Thoughts?
>
> A follow up to this is that I found a Macro "$NOTIFICATIONTYPE$". The
> problem is I don't want this Macro sent out on every notification. I
> need to find someway of allowing for the seperate config for a
> acknowledgement notification. The word "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT" specified is
> also to long f
> > Am I missing something fundamental about this command ?
>
> It appears that you missed the 'min:max' vs. 'max:min' thing on the ranges,
> but 1) that's a common oversight, and 2) it doesn't appear to be the real
> reason you're getting nothing but warnings.
James, thanks for all this detai
Darn - never mind - I found the setting. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. :(
--
- Kyle
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.panix.com/~kylet
-
---
This SF.
Hi,
I am getting a lot of these errors on my distributed server.
Warning: OCSP command
'/usr/local/nagios/libexec/eventhandlers/submit_check_result
olclient1 'check-sendmail' OK 'SNMP OK - 0 exitstatus - 1 processes - sendmail
-''
for service 'check-sendmail' on host 'olclient1' timed
After playing with gdb all day, I found the culprit. The array of chars
named "type" was getting initialized with the crud on Solaris 10. On 8
it was zeroed out at runtime. Using bzero on it before it's used fixed
it up.
*** check_snmp.c.orig Mon Mar 6 08:05:26 2006
--- check_snmp.cMon
I just want to add that snmpget returns a good clean string on both
Solaris 8 and 10. I also copied over and ran the check_snmp that I
built (and runs well) on Solaris 8 on the Solaris 10 system and it
too returns the garbage strings. So I'm at a total loss as to what
about Solaris 10 that would c
Hi,
I had check_snmp from the 1.4.2 plugins working great with
Net-SNMP 5.2.2 on Solaris 8. I have built it all on Solaris 10 now
for my production server and I get mangled data back from check_snmp
going to the exact same snmpd client.
Here's a good working Solaris 8 query from check_s
Okay,
We found the issue in popen.c that was just
bailing if it found any double quote in the command
string. Commenting out this bit of code allowed the
quoted OIDs to work.
/* This is not a shell, so we don't handle "???" */
if (strstr (cmdstring, "\""))
return NU
ndResult.\"extt2\"
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendResult."extt2" = INTEGER: 2
> 2006/2/16, Kyle Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
> > I'm trying to use the new extend directive
> > in Net-SNMP and the symbolic OIDs litera
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new extend directive
in Net-SNMP and the symbolic OIDs literally contain
a quote. I can't get check_snmp to be satisfied with
the quotes I need to pass. I need to be able to pass
nsExtendResult."extt2" to snmpd. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
/usr/local/nagios/libexec/
t;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Tucker
> > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:26 PM
> > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed server
>
> I'm currently searching for a way to monitor an active directory using
> nagios. The mainproblem I have is that I my active directory knowledge
> tends to zero. I'm currently searching for docs where I can find atleast
> the ports which I have to monitor, but until now without success. I had
>
Hi,
I have Nagios set up in distributed mode. I am
wondering if this should have a direct affect on how
parenting is set up. I think visually from the status
maps, it would look "right" to have the all clients have
the distributed monitor system be its parent and perhaps
have the central se
>
> I'm confused about my Nagios configuration. My Nagios monitoring host is
> Linux (Slackware ) box. All clients I need to monitor are Tru64 boxes.
> So, I was able to compile NRPE on the Tru64 boxes, but it appears I need all
> plugins locally on the system. So I want to install the standard
Hi,
I have compiled the check_snmp plugin from the
nagios-plugins-1.4.2 source code against Net-SNMP 5.2.2.
All of the options I pass to check_snmp don't get passed
along to snmpget, yet they're in the source code. Any
clue what's up? Here's successful use of snmpget and what
gets passed
> In order for freshness checks to work in 2.0 and up, you have to set as
> follows.
> check_period 24x7
> passive_checks_enabled 1
> active_checks_enabled0 ; these are all passive checks
> check_freshness 1
> c
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Shipway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:08 PM
> > To: 'Andrew Laden'; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Disabling GIF image for passive checks
> >
> > > > With active checks enabled
Hey all,
I've set up distributed servers and a surprising and
unwanted by-product of this setup is the passive GIF image
placed against all passive service checks on the web pages
(images/passiveonly.gif). I'd like to disable this, firstly
because I don't need to visually see each and ev
44 matches
Mail list logo
