Hi Stanislas,
the RC UNKNOWN and the message '[timeout encountered after 10s]' is not
from check_icmp, but from the check_multi child check timeout, which
also encountered after 10s. :)
To get sure which timeout actually is working, either specify another
timeout for check_icmp, or for check_mul
Hi Tim,
> However when I run it from the nagios server I don't see the output from
> our sendmail mailqueue check, which is the last check listed in our
> /usr/local/nagios/checks/systemhealth.cmd file:
The report option -r 11 (1+2+8) is not a good idea, because you left out -r 4
to show errors
> - The ramdisk idea is also interesting. I'm curious though, about why one
> would want to rsync it back to the local disk periodically. It's just a
> run-time status file, right? Unless I misread the docs, it goes away when
> Nagios is shut down. What would having a local disk copy of status
On 9/25/10 2:30 PM, Frost, Mark {PBC} wrote:
> Greetings, listers,
>
>
>
> We've got an on-going issue with i/o contention. There's the obvious
> problem that we've got a whole lot of things all writing to the same
> partition. In this case, there's just one big chunk of RAID 5 disk on a
> si
> I was wondering if there was any way with nagios 3.2 to override the global
> interval_length
> for a specific service? I have one service that I would like to check every
> 30 seconds, but
> interval_length in 60. I could change the interval_length definition, of
> course, but then I
> wou
Ton Voon wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 26 Oct 2009, at 10:18, Mattias Ryrlén wrote:
>
>> This can be solved with issue the following error.
>>
>> service nagios stop; now=$(date +%s); sed -i
>> "s/^next_check=.*/next_check=$now/" /usr/local/nagios/var/status.sav;
>> service nagios start
>>
>> this will o
Seth Simmons wrote:
> I think I found the problem. When I ran check_yum locally I forgot it was
> running as root which explains why it worked. Running locally as nagios
> caused the error. Apparently it isn't the plugin. If, as nagios, I run yum
> check-update it tells me I need to be roo
Jarrod Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Matthias Flacke
> wrote:
>> Jarrod Moore wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>>>> Jarrod Moore wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>&
Jarrod Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>> Jarrod Moore wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I have a couple of related questions regarding service dependencies in
>>> Nagios and their limitations. I have two service checks (let's call
>>> them A and B) and se
Jim Avery wrote:
> The book I used to recommend (Nagios by Wolfgang Barth
> published by No Starch Press) gives an excellent introduction but
> unless it's been updated it won't include a lot of useful stuff new in
> version 3.
Just as a side note: it is up2date. In October 2008 the 2nd edition
w
Christian Schneemann wrote:
> On Monday January 26 2009 09:39:56 am Kevin Zellar wrote:
>> how to use check_ping if there are 2 ip addresses per host?
[snip some definitions for check_ping]
> I hope there is an easier way to do this.
> Maybe with check_multi?
Although you can do it with check_
Maybe a check_multi solution is something for you
(http://my-plugin.de/check_multi):
- 8< --
# hysteresis.cmd
# call: check_multi -f hysteresis.cmd \
#-s LASTSERVICESTATEID=$LASTSERVICESTATEID$ \
#-s UPPER= -s LOWER=
#
# 1. get tempe
Hi Hari,
please have a look at http://my-plugin.de/check_multi.
It wraps arbitrary calls of plugins, commands, whatever you need and is not
limited to process checks.
Just as a more generic approach, while the basic idea is very similar ;-)
-Matthias
Hari Sekhon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I have
users USERS CRITICAL - 3 users currently logged in
[ 2] who_q mflacke mflacke mflacke
Greetz,
Matthias Flacke
--
http://my-plugin.de/check_multi
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don'
Hi,
Riccardo Cupardo wrote:
> Ty for your reply Marc,
>
> I configured check_service_cluster and working very well, but requied
> two stand-alone Mssql-Check services... because is a Mssql cluster, the
> normal scenario is: one started and one stopped
> And i have a critical report on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I had thought about writing a custom check for each line
> > of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly
> > painful.
[...]
> > I'm guessing the answer here is "Nagios can't do that", but I thought
> > I'd ask anyway.
>
> Technically Nagios c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just upgraded from 2.X line to 3.0 rc1, and I notice that the Status
> Information field no longer supports embedded URLs..
> Previously I could send a passive check result via nsca like:
> Some alarm text http://somelink.com";> click me
> Now this no longer renders a
js wrote:
> I'm using Nagios 3.0RC1.
> I'm using the latest check_cluster plugin in order to implement cluster
> logic into Nagios.
> I'm monitoring clustered hosts and NOT services.
> The whole thing seems to work correct but when the clusterhost is in a
> warning state, it is still displayed in
I'd like to suggest a completely different approach - again with the plugin
check_multi (http://my-plugin.de/check_multi) which I yesterday introduced in
another context. ;-)
Take the following scenario: you have a parent check_multi service for each
region (user/admin/organisational) you want
iews)
HTH - Matthias Flacke
- original message
Subject: [Nagios-users] Propagating Service Changes
Sent: Wed, 02 Jan 2008
From: Mohr James<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi All!
>
> First off my apologies. Apparently I forget to stop the subscription
> while I was on vacation,
20 matches
Mail list logo
