Hi Aaron,
You wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out if this is possible for a while. I'm
> using NRPE and $LONGHOSTOUTPUT$ for a number of tests, which is great,
> except for passive monitoring. We have several data centers that run
> their own Nagios boxes and then ship the data back to the mas
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You need to call iostat with multiple checks - the longer the better -
> but then it means you would have to run iostat for like 30 seconds or
> so -> plugin runtime is 30 seconds too then! That means that check
> would have a high delay/latency, whic
On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
> I had thought about writing a custom check for each line
> of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly
> painful.
You could write one active check that parses the output, figures out
what's gone wrong, and then submits
Hello,
Blue Gecko Inc, is proud to announce the first release of Monocle, our
open source (GPLv2) Oracle 10g database monitoring package! Monocle
mostly consists of a body of PL/SQL code that runs inside the database
as scheduled Oracle jobs. When events occur inside the database that
are signif
Roger wrote:
> I'm looking for tools that will give Nagios some visibility inside the
> Linux kernel.
What are you trying to learn from the kernel? I think it'd be handy
to have a monitor that would alert if a process started doing more
than a certain amount of block i/o operations. Or perhaps
Marco wrote:
> What I did is to send the passive host check through NSCA only if its
> in hard state, soft states are ignored, what script do you use to call
> send_nsca ?
Just a simple script that pipes "$HOST\t$RESULT\t$OUTPUT\n" into
send_nsca. I'll need to also pass in $HOSTSTATETYPE$ and ex
Thanks Marc, I found this answer from Ethan Galstad in the thread you posted:
> Nagios 2 doesn't support a max_attempts directive for hosts and all
> passive host check results will immediately force the host into a HARD
> state. This has changed a bit in Nagios 3 - hosts do have a
> max_atte
Howdy,
Host A is a server which sends passive host/service results to host B
via NSCA. When a single host check fails on host C (a machine
monitored by host A) host A considers host C to be a SOFT state, where
host B (the one that actually sends notifications) considers host C to
be in a HARD sta
> I have to monitor a "thing" that works with snmptraps, but I don`t know
> what I have to do.
You need to have a machine that listens for SNMP traps. The program
snmptrapd does this, it comes with net-snmp package. This daemon
writes the trap info to the system log, or alternately runs a
pro
I can't speak for OpenNMS, but I think for Nagios the answer for a lot
of your questions is going to be:
"There isn't a way of doing this with the standard nagios plugin
package, but someone has probably written a plugin that does this,
check the Nagios Exchange site."
> % Confirm each machine i
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> I'm puzzled by this term of 'disk bandwitdh'. I am not quit sure we are on
> the same wavelenght here. But I could imagine digging up the absolute
> counters and using rrd to build the usual graphs out of them.
Sorry for not making this clear. The iostat and sar ut
Hi!
I've been unable to find a nagios plugin that monitors disk bandwidth
utilization, does anybody know of one? It seems like it would be
relatively straightforward to wrap a nagios plugin around a utility
like iostat or sar, but I thought I'd ask if anyone had done this
before I dive in.
Than
Howdy,
I have nagios set up to send notifications every five minutes. This
makes sense when a service is CRITICAL, but makes less sense when it
is simpily WARNING. Warnings go to a separate email alias... every
five minutes. Normally during the day I acknowledge them, but during
the evening th
13 matches
Mail list logo
