Re: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications

2008-02-21 Thread Mike Hamrick
On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote: > I had thought about writing a custom check for each line > of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly > painful. You could write one active check that parses the output, figures out what's gone wrong, and then submits

Re: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications

2008-02-20 Thread Matthias Flacke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I had thought about writing a custom check for each line > > of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly > > painful. [...] > > I'm guessing the answer here is "Nagios can't do that", but I thought > > I'd ask anyway. > > Technically Nagios c

Re: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications

2008-02-20 Thread mark . potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/20/2008 09:46:12 AM: > > On more than a few occasions, I've had users ask me if it's possible to > have alerts sent if the output of a check changes. That is, if you > consider that a check might actually have multiple failure conditions it > could be monitoring.

Re: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications

2008-02-20 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frost, Mark {PBG} > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:46 AM > To: Nagios Users Mailinglist > Subject: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications > &g

[Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications

2008-02-20 Thread Frost, Mark {PBG}
On more than a few occasions, I've had users ask me if it's possible to have alerts sent if the output of a check changes. That is, if you consider that a check might actually have multiple failure conditions it could be monitoring. And example of this might be a single command you run that repo