On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
> I had thought about writing a custom check for each line
> of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly
> painful.
You could write one active check that parses the output, figures out
what's gone wrong, and then submits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I had thought about writing a custom check for each line
> > of output that this command generates, but that seems needlessly
> > painful.
[...]
> > I'm guessing the answer here is "Nagios can't do that", but I thought
> > I'd ask anyway.
>
> Technically Nagios c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/20/2008 09:46:12
AM:
>
> On more than a few occasions, I've had users ask me if it's possible to
> have alerts sent if the output of a check changes. That is, if you
> consider that a check might actually have multiple failure conditions it
> could be monitoring.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frost, Mark {PBG}
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:46 AM
> To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
> Subject: [Nagios-users] State Stalking and notifications
>
&g
On more than a few occasions, I've had users ask me if it's possible to
have alerts sent if the output of a check changes. That is, if you
consider that a check might actually have multiple failure conditions it
could be monitoring. And example of this might be a single command you
run that repo