Its been like that for years, just very rare cases.
Worth is that about 4-6 months ago I started seeing multiple dns servers
registered for the same ip address. Plus to that neither .biz nor .info
dns servers are even showing on the internic root.
System is totally broken, I'll try to raise
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
As for your service listing them... Smurfs aren't spam, so I'm not sure
what you plan to accomplish by making the data available via DNS, it would
really only be useful as a BGP feed. Even then, it's usefulness is
limited. I suppose you could
long before there were specific gtld-servers. I first
saw this type of response in 1987. (I was not looking
before then... :)
When did this start?
dig uunet.com @a.gtld-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 uunet.com @a.gtld-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res
Hello,
Thursday, April 04, 2002, 3:26:18 AM, you wrote:
wen Worth is that about 4-6 months ago I started seeing multiple dns servers
wen registered for the same ip address. Plus to that neither .biz nor .info
wen dns servers are even showing on the internic root.
Yea, apparently in January
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Allan Liska wrote:
Yea, apparently in January Verisign changed their long standing policy of
allowing only one name server to be registered per IP Address. To
confuse matters even more, I don't think all of the registrars support
this, and I have not seen anything
That is exactly the situation of original question - having two ips for
same dns server. It is not possible to register new dns server this way
but long time ago when internic dns/whois system was originally introduced
(pre 1990 to around 1994) it was possible and some companies did that,
Somewhat on the topic but going into future instead of the past...
I'm wondering if anyone started working on dns host registration system
for ipv6 and whois support for this. It seems that currently all ipv6 dns
comes from existing domains that are setup with ipv4 and there is no root
ipv6
yes, I'll get it updated. it might be worthwhile noting that there is
ipv6 support in rwhois. I know several registries have been working on
this topic for a while and folks ought to see the results of these efforts
in the next few months.
it is also true that the v6 root testbed has been
Hmm. There is alot of speculation that their network is largely subsidized
by their Yellow Pages franchise. Let your fingers do the walking, et al.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Shawn Solomon
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:24
Matt Levine wrote:
When did this start?
Associating multiple IP addresses with a single name server (i.e., multiple
A records with the same owner) in the com, net and org zones has always been
possible with the NSI Registry/VeriSign Global Registry Services. This
behavior is documented in the
An immediate positive benefit is that it's no
longer possible for someone to hold a given IP address hostage by
registering a name server at that address. (Anyone can register a
com/net/org name server at any IP address.)
I've been waiting for this fix, but OpenSRS (via domainmonger.com)
Please can someone that deals with routing issues at Exodus.net contact me
off the list, or if anyone knows of a good contact at Exodus.net please
contact me off the list.
Thanks in advance.
Shawn.
12 matches
Mail list logo
