This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Apr 5 23:00:00 PST 2002
It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully
you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look
through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you
perform.
Check http:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > [sabri@bofh sabri]$ whois -h whois.apnic.net 172.21.3.168
> > > http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
> > > inetnum: 172.21.3.168 - 172.21.3.199
> > > netname: DSB-KR
> Someone has done an Apnic registration for rfc1918 private IP spa
:>I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no justification
:>for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within
:>66.231.
:>
:>Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows:
:>66.231.64.0/20 GIGA-BLK-1
:
: Last I checked, Columbia was part of South
> I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no
> justification
> for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within
> 66.231.
>
> Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows:
> 66.231.64.0/20 GIGA-BLK-1
> 66.231.128.0/20 ECON-BLK-1
>
> Why have thes
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:56:46 -0500 (EST), Brian Wallingford wrote:
>I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no justification
>for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within
>66.231.
>
>Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows:
>66.231.64.0/20 G
I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no justification
for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within
66.231.
Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows:
66.231.64.0/20 GIGA-BLK-1
66.231.128.0/20 ECON-BLK-1
Both of which appear to be comple
Some providers even use /31s on peering interfaces
if the other side can also. Most modern router software
supports this feature.
- jared
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:48:59AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here
In the referenced message, Adrian Chadd said:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any
> PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy
> with?
>
> If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on
> IPv4 Poi
Hi all,
Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any
PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy
with?
If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on
IPv4 Point-to-Point Links"
Thanks,
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd
And here we go, down the rabbit hole... (see below)
> Steve Naslund Said...
>
>
>
> I would have to disagree on a lot of these points. See below.
>
> Steven Naslund
>
> > Daniel Golding Said...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I suppose. Except it's not even certain you were having a problem of any
> > kind
Did they ask you to update RADB or IRR entries? Many times these are used to
build prefix lists for customers at some ISPs, and they get updated
periodically (basically a CRON job). Typically, stuff like RTConfig is used
for this, or home-grown Perl scripts. There can sometimes be a delay in
gett
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> I think the main point here isn't the fact that the poster's routing was, in fact,
> not set up properly; it was the fact that he was unable to get a live body at Qwest
> to check it out.
Interestingly enough, there was indeed a problem. I'm not sati
> 1, Some of the exchange points are layer 2 facilities, then why do they need
> register IP addresses? Furthermore, those IP addresses do appears in the
> traceroute traces (from the skitter data of caida). Does this mean that these
> IP addresses are actually in use?
Nearly all
Hi,
I am a graduate student of computer science, now I am working on Internet
exchange points. Following the discussion of exchange points last month, I
have some more specific questions.
1, Some of the exchange points are layer 2 facilities, then why do they need
register IP addresses? Furthe
> It's not a MAE. All MAE's are listed at http://www.mae.net/
...which has never stopped some other early exchanges from calling
themselves MAEs, just as there are exchanges that call themselves NAPs,
other than the NII-defined four. Not suggesting it's a good idea, just
that it's been the
I think the main point here isn't the fact that the poster's routing was, in fact,
not set up properly; it was the fact that he was unable to get a live body at Qwest
to check it out.
-C
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:53PM -0500, Daniel Golding wrote:
>
> I suppose. Except it's not even certai
Yeah. I got that part of it, and I don't disagree that many large carriers
have less than stellar support.
Some things to consider when looking at the support you get from a large
ISP...
- Most problems you will have are going to be circuit problems - i.e. "my
T-1 is down, AGAIN". Therefore, mo
>> It's not a MAE. All MAE's are listed at http://www.mae.net/
>>
>> There appears to have been a proposal last year for a meet-point
>> in Phoenix for networks participating in a telemedicine project.
>> Does not appear to be intended to exchange public Internet traffic.
IIRC, There was a MAE
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Donn Lasher wrote:
>
> I see from the great speadsheet (ep-in-addrs) that there is mention of a
> phoenix NAP. However, I can't find any info anywhere on the web / etc about
> it.
>
> Does it exist, either a MAE or otherwise? What's the physical address? Who
> is there?
It's not a MAE. All MAE's are listed at http://www.mae.net/
There appears to have been a proposal last year for a meet-point
in Phoenix for networks participating in a telemedicine project.
Does not appear to be intended to exchange public Internet traffic.
> I see from the great speadsheet (
You totally missed the point. Had this been a real emergency, he would be
unable to get resolution since Qwest was unable to dredge up a clue within
their customer support machine.
Greg U
At 05:24 PM 4/4/2002, you wrote:
>I suppose. Except it's not even certain you were having a problem of
I see from the great speadsheet (ep-in-addrs) that there is mention of a
phoenix NAP. However, I can't find any info anywhere on the web / etc about
it.
Does it exist, either a MAE or otherwise? What's the physical address? Who
is there?
Offline answers are fine.
-donn
http://www.msnbc.com/news/734349.asp?0cm=c20
Stocks at 7.26 right now. ANyone want to guess what bottom will be?
Eric
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Germann;Eric
FN:Eric Germann
ORG:CCTec
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(419) 968-2640
TEL;WORK;FAX:(603) 825-5893
ADR;WORK:;;17780 Middle Point Road;Van Wert;OH;45891
23 matches
Mail list logo
