Does anyone have information regarding what type of low end routers people
are using to provide Internet connectivity via DS3 and OC3 interfaces to
customers without costing an arm and a leg! Very interested in
pricing/vendors.
Thanks in advance!
Sonya Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
678-441-7973
At 07:15 AM 4/22/2002, James Cronin wrote:
As it's still likely to end up with the most popular domains
hotmail.com, yahoo.com, aol.com having several thousand recipients
though I'm still interested in whether anyone has more experience
of ensuring that mail doesn't get blackholed.
At my last
This subject has probably been talked to death, so I apologise in advance
for bringing it up!
Is there any DNS server currently availible that can reply to DNS lookups
based on the source IP address?
Yes, this would be for directing users to a 'local' server hosting
www.example.org (or
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:55:15PM +0100, Avleen Vig wrote:
This subject has probably been talked to death, so I apologise in advance
for bringing it up!
Is there any DNS server currently availible that can reply to DNS lookups
based on the source IP address?
Yes, this would be for
On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 08:55:15PM +0100, Avleen Vig wrote:
Is there any DNS server currently availible that can reply to DNS lookups
based on the source IP address?
Yes, all those global load balancing products. (e.g. Cisco Distributed
Director). Alternatively, some people (myself included)
From the Canarie news mailing list.
I don't think I've ever experienced five 9's on any telco
service, I have always assumed I must be the one customer
experiencing down-time, and the aggregate was somehow five
9's. How is network reliability calculated to end up with
five 9's?
Pete.
On 2002-04-24-15:55:15, Avleen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any DNS server currently availible that can reply to DNS
lookups based on the source IP address?
tinydns can; the obvious challenge is devising a useful set of mapping
metrics.
-a
How to calculate uptime and get 5 9s
-do not include any outage less than 20 minutes.
-only include down lines that are actually reported by customers.
-when possible fix the line and report 'no trouble found'.
-remember that your company is penalized by the FCC for bad ratings, so
don't
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Art Houle wrote:
How to calculate uptime and get 5 9s
-do not include any outage less than 20 minutes.
-only include down lines that are actually reported by customers.
-when possible fix the line and report 'no trouble found'.
-remember that your company is penalized
Art Houle wrote:
How to calculate uptime and get 5 9s
-do not include any outage less than 20 minutes.
-only include down lines that are actually reported by customers.
-when possible fix the line and report 'no trouble found'.
-remember that your company is penalized by the FCC for
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Art Houle wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Art Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pete Kruckenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Myth of Five 9's Reliability (fwd)
How to calculate uptime and get 5 9s
-do not
This is the sort of thing that can be discussed forever, but here's an
anecdote anyway:
At my previous employer, we hired a lot of people who had spent their
entire careers either running or developing equipment for TDM voice
networks. Their view of five nines for voice was that the network
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 03:47 , Shivkuma wrote:
Inter-domain:
- Hot potato/cold potato routing
- Inbound load balancing (between peering links)
- Inbound load balancing (between transit links or a mix of
peering/transit)
- Outbound load balancing (between peering
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
Yes, this would be for directing users to a 'local' server hosting
www.example.org (or something similar).
Yes, this is not the best way of doing it I know :-)
It's the best way to do global server load balancing, as I
Even disregarding the issue of whether 99.999% network reliability is
possible, people have made it abundantly clear that they don't want
it.
In this case I define to want as to be willing to pay even a little
bit extra for.
This is even the case in POTS telephony. I know lots of people who
the issue was originally raised on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are name server implementations (probably load balancing product)
that responds with NXDOMAIN, when it should respond with NOERROR with
empty reply. one example is news.bbc.co.uk. this symptom not only
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Avleen Vig wrote:
Is there any DNS server currently availible that can reply to DNS lookups
based on the source IP address?
Yes. djbdns has done this for quite a while. Note I am not necessarily
recommending the use of djbdns, I am just saying it will do this.
I also
17 matches
Mail list logo
