223.255.255.0/24 has historically been designated as a special-use network
as it is the numerically highest Class C network. It is listed in
RFC3330 as Reserved but open for possible future allocation.
Now that 222/7 has been allocated to APNIC, the question comes up as to
whether it is retaining
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, John Ferriby wrote:
> Does anyone know of a WHOIS archive? Netsol/SRS/Arin? Or for
> that matter, any coordinated efforts to capture this information?
There seem to be partial records going back to at least SRI-NIC, and
maybe even further back when ISI/IANA handled registr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello John,
Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 10:30:36 PM, you wrote:
JF> Does anyone know of a WHOIS archive? Netsol/SRS/Arin? Or for
JF> that matter, any coordinated efforts to capture this information?
This is a question that has been asked repea
Does anyone know of a WHOIS archive? Netsol/SRS/Arin? Or for
that matter, any coordinated efforts to capture this information?
--
John Ferriby - PGP Key: www.ferriby.com/pgpkey
Fingerprint: 3B78 10AF A1B2 20D0 A5D9 983F 96FF D5BB CF11 BA97
If you see a smime.p7s attachment it is only a digita
And just to be totally fair so that mfnx isn't misrepresented or anything.
I've looked back and it doesn't seem like I got an autoresponded ticket
and while calling the voice lines I got a fast busy which after some
digging was a result of some voice issues on my carrier. So although it
seemed t
In a message written on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:02:24AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
> Nope, nobody responded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I tried here, got a response
> and was all set. Helpful once you get around the noc where we had no
> response.
This is not in response to Scott's specific probl
After running into each other in airports and congregating in hotels
and conference centers across this planet, some of us in the
mid-Atlantic area of the US have decided that it is not only
possible but likely even useful to meet locally from time to time.
The purpose would be to swap technical o
Would anyone who is running QoS/SLA/application performance
monitors (ie BRIX Networks) be willing to share (on the list
or privately) what their experience has been with those
products and how they are used/useful in actual experience
to engineer and operate networks.
Pete.
Thus spake "Simon Lyall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> IMHO posting to nanog to contact a Noc should be the last resort. If
> you have no response to email you should try various numbers you
> have for their Noc, then your account manager (they love getting called
> at 3am cause the Noc won't respond to c
Oh and by the way, just to be super clear it wasn't more than ten minutes
after I posted that when I received some really superior help.
So I'm hoping my thred doesn't turn in to an mfn bashing session, its not
deserved. I'll just end this hear and say thank you.
Scott
Well sometimes that's valuable and sometimes people make genuine mistakes
which they really shouldn't be publically called on the carpet for. I
will say to everyone that every time I have had to post to nanog I have
always gotten a very helpful response and all were operational in nature.
I think
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
> Nope, nobody responded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I tried here, got a response
> and was all set. Helpful once you get around the noc where we had no
> response.
IMHO posting to nanog to contact a Noc should be the last resort. If you
have no response
I need a contact within AOL that handles their spam/abuse reporting
system. Please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
--
Stephen Milton - Vice President(425) 881-8769 x102
ISOMEDIA.COM - Premium Internet Services(425) 869-9437 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:17:19PM +, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> I received a document with an attached "exhibit 1" in december listing my
> genuity service contract which was for "contracts to be assumed and assigned to
> purchaser"
>
> .. some others have since come but i've not had t
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:20:31AM -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
> provided of course *you* can actually deliver me a DS3 in a week or
> so if I sign papers between now and Friday!
Encourage them why don't you. Seriously though, might you not
consider a second path to the sea. We've been doing th
2. Can somebody from either Genuity or L3 clue me in (offlist)
Wow... I got a call from my new genuity, er L3 rep within two minutes
of this hitting nanog. Damn this list is good! =)
Still no clarification to our situation, but it has been promised by tomorrow.
...and yeah, all you folks wh
I received a document with an attached "exhibit 1" in december listing my
genuity service contract which was for "contracts to be assumed and assigned to
purchaser"
.. some others have since come but i've not had the one you mention. perhaps its
in the post?
from what i can see all genuity
Apologies for being marginally operational (but it looks like a lot
of Genuity customers might be going dark in one week, with one week's
notice ... so it might be considered operational...)
I received a mountain of court documents yesterday from the US
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of N
Nope, nobody responded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I tried here, got a response
and was all set. Helpful once you get around the noc where we had no
response.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:54:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Anyone from mf
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:54:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone from mfn around can you contact me off list?
Did you confuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] with [EMAIL PROTECTED] again?
--
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F
20 matches
Mail list logo
