UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Boyle
At 12:27 AM 5/29/2003 -0400, you wrote: Sheesh. Heh. We're still here. Part of a rectifier in a Liebert UPS let loose, causing a momentary fire. That is, until the FM200 quenched it. Since there seems to be interest, I will post the post-mortem to the list. I had a little 2000VA rackmount

RE: Need DNS server outside my own network

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Damm
I would recommend the DNS-Swap list (http://www.ironclad.net.au/lists/dns-swap/). It's very low volume (2 posts/mo) but when someone actually posts something you generally receive some good responses. It covers the entire spectrum from swapping secondary for a few zones to swapping colo for

Re: Wireless border crossings

2003-05-30 Thread Subhi S Hashwa
Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 4:09:14 PM, Timothy wrote: I'm looking for organizations or individuals that have existing wireless (802.11, MMDS, etc) connectivity across international borders in eastern Europe (former Soviet republics), Asia, Africa, or the Middle East. Also of interest are

NOC Telephone List Update

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Hallgren
Hi guys, What's the currently efficient/preferred way of updating (replacing, rather than adding) a record at http://puck.nether.net/netops/ :: NOC Telephone List ? Cheers, mh -- Michael Hallgren, http://m.hallgren.free.fr/, mh2198-ripe

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Bill Woodcock
I had a little 2000VA rackmount Liebert UPS catch fire in 1997 and another new and improved Liebert model almost catch fire about a year later. What have others experienced as the failure mode(s) for their UPS(s)? We had a two-hour grid power outage here in Berkeley

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Lars Erik Gullerud
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:31, Robert Boyle wrote: I had a little 2000VA rackmount Liebert UPS catch fire in 1997 and another new and improved Liebert model almost catch fire about a year later. Both were operating well within specified input, load, and temperature parameters. I haven't

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread David Raistrick
I've seen two previous APCs (both Matrixes) fry batteries... The batteries balloon up, and get really hot, and are too big to extract from the chassis. APC's solution to this is to have us take the entire UPS offline for several days to completely dissipate the heat, and then try to I've

Issues in New York?

2003-05-30 Thread Rob Thomas
Hi, NANOGers. This post is on behalf of Alif Terranson. If anyone can lend a hand or share insight, please pass it along! Thanks! We have all manner of equipment freaking out at State Street's POP, and can find no reason for it: M20's, BSNs, Yurie's, etc. Some of this equipment

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gerald writes: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote: I've seen two previous APCs (both Matrixes) fry batteries... The batteries balloon up, and get really hot, and are too big to extract from the chassis. I've also personally witnessed an APC do this. I'm

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Gerald
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: There was a recent recall of some of their home/SOHO UPSs -- battery overheating, with risk of fire. Got the notice when it came out. Checked all our UPS's and none were listed. Gerald

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Gerald wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote: I've seen two previous APCs (both Matrixes) fry batteries... The batteries balloon up, and get really hot, and are too big to extract from the chassis. I've also personally witnessed an APC do this. I'm not a

Re: NOC Telephone List Update

2003-05-30 Thread Jared Mauch
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:40:46PM +0200, Michael Hallgren wrote: Hi guys, What's the currently efficient/preferred way of updating (replacing, rather than adding) a record at http://puck.nether.net/netops/ :: NOC Telephone List ? Cheers, You need to really-really annoy me,

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread listuser
On Thu, 29 May 2003, David Raistrick wrote: I've only heard one report of APC's that caught fire...and even then it was just the carpet below that caught fire. running to move my APC UPS... Justin

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread listuser
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Dan Hollis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Gerald wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote: I've seen two previous APCs (both Matrixes) fry batteries... The batteries balloon up, and get really hot, and are too big to extract from the chassis. I've also

LH/ELH Recommendations?

2003-05-30 Thread Deepak Jain
Last time I asked the list for recommendations on how to solve a short reach fiber problem I got some amazing answers and suggestions -- for which, I am still appreciative of. I summarized for everyone who asked and will gladly do so if anyone else would like to know. I've got a new pickle I am

Re: LH/ELH Recommendations?

2003-05-30 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Deepak Jain wrote: I am trying to signal over a dark fiber (SMF) loop of about 200 miles. (150mi on one leg and 50mi on the other). I would _like_ to find a 10GE solution (say a XENPAK module that will do 150miles), but GE would do if it supports some kind of xWDM. As

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
(header trimmed) Hello, First off, we're all still alive here. Underlying root cause was a failure of a capacitor in the rectifier section. We're not sure what actually caused the failure of the failure of the capacitor, but it resulted in the internals of the capacitor being ejected from the

They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Sean Donelan
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Robert Boyle wrote: The reason for this rambling post is to ask if others have had similar problems with other UPS brands. I think they should have enough fail-safes built-in that they are never the CAUSE of an outage much less a fire! Based on my experience and NAC's

RE: NOC Telephone List Update

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Hallgren
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:40:46PM +0200, Michael Hallgren wrote: Hi guys, What's the currently efficient/preferred way of updating (replacing, rather than adding) a record at http://puck.nether.net/netops/ :: NOC Telephone List ? Cheers, Jared, You need to

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
UPSes (and UPS batteries) do fail, sometimes in catastrophic ways. I would not design any critical system on the assumption that any particular component won't fail. High availability is about designing for failure. Sometimes there is a long time between failures, other times they occur

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Thu May 29, 2003 at 04:29:13PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote: From folks I've talked to (engineers and industry people), Powerware seems to be known as the UPS that just works. I've yet to talk to one person who had a powerware die on them. Myself included. We are a Powerware house. We had

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bill Woodcock wrote: I had a little 2000VA rackmount Liebert UPS catch fire in 1997 and another new and improved Liebert model almost catch fire about a year later. What have others experienced as the failure mode(s) for their UPS(s)? We had a

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Lockhart wrote: On Thu May 29, 2003 at 04:29:13PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote: From folks I've talked to (engineers and industry people), Powerware seems to be known as the UPS that just works. I've yet to talk to one person who had a powerware die on them.

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Armstrong
Or we could all take a page from the book of telecom, and run with DC systems. No inverters involved, lots of parallel rectifiers and battery power just sitting there. If only the equipment manufacturers would stop gauging on price for DC equipment/power supplies. Dan. Alex Rubenstein

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Sean Donelan
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Alex Rubenstein wrote: Even in instances where 'High availability' is designed, in the case where one of the units has a failure that causes a fire and FM200 dump, either the FM200 will still trigger an EPO, or the fire department will. Why do you think most telephone

Re: LH/ELH Recommendations?

2003-05-30 Thread N. Richard Solis
I'm afraid that there isn't a good commercially-available way to send any high speed optical signal over a single continuous fiber for 200 miles. The physics simply prohibit it. The source of the problem is a limit on the maximum launch power into the fiber before you start to see

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Arman
We are opening a new facility in SF and are seriously considering the idea of by passing a large UPS (150-225KVA)altogether and relay on a generator 400-450KW with small UPSes on each rack. A UPS failure would be limited to a single rack, this way we could My personal experience with ATSes is

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Boyle
At 04:39 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, you wrote: A much cheaper and easier to implement external maintenance make-before-break bypass will accomplish the same thing. I've heard many a story of the paralleling gear causing the problem in the first place, as well... We have two MGE 150KVA UPSes at our Newton

RE: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Shaun Bryant
One thing people seam to have forgotten is that with added redundancy comes added complexity that is many cases out ways the gain. Shaun -Original Message- From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:40 PM To: Sean Donelan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LH/ELH Recommendations?

2003-05-30 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 29 May 2003, N. Richard Solis wrote: effects of high laser power on glass fibers. At last guess, that limit was about +17dBm into standard SMF-28. Couple this with a typical receive sensitivity of -12dBm for 10gpbs signals and you've for about 29dB of link margin to work with.

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Pete Ehlke
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 04:29:13PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote: I have no direct experience with MGE, but I recall several multi-hour outages in Jersey City Exodus, that I think had something to do with MGE Correct. There were, if I recall correctly, a total of five in a short period,

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread nicholas harteau
Arman wrote: We are opening a new facility in SF and are seriously considering the idea of by passing a large UPS (150-225KVA)altogether and relay on a generator 400-450KW with small UPSes on each rack. A UPS failure would be limited to a single rack, this way we could We run a

dnsbl's? - an informal survey

2003-05-30 Thread Williamson, Todd
A situation recently popped up that prompted a question: How many operations utilize any kind of dnsbl (or any other kind of third party reporting service) on customer facing SMTP servers? (customer facing == end users of your operation's service receive mail there) I'm sure legal issues apply;

Re: Does anyone have an up to date list of ASN allocations?

2003-05-30 Thread Geoff Huston
At 05:58 PM 28/05/2003 -0700, Herb Leong wrote: E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #HL Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:28:45 -0700 #HL From: Herb Leong # # #HLDoes anyone have an up to date list of ASN assignments? #HL All of the usual places that I normaly check are now out #HL of date.

Update to the bogon route-server project

2003-05-30 Thread Rob Thomas
Hi, NANOGers. We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.7 of the Bogon Route-Server Project. The major change in release 1.7 is the addition of three more bogon route-servers to the bogon route-server project, for a total of four. These are all managed by Team Cymru, and provide

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Armstrong
I agree, of course it is ludicrous to think otherwise. It has always bothered me that we rectify AC power to store it in batteries, then re-invert it to power AC servers only for them to rectify it again Dan. Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote: Or we could all take a page from the book of

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Sean Donelan wrote: UPSes (and UPS batteries) do fail, sometimes in catastrophic ways. I would not design any critical system on the assumption that any particular component won't fail. High availability is about designing for failure. Sometimes there is a long time

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread E.B. Dreger
SD Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:53:43 -0400 (EDT) SD From: Sean Donelan SD Yep, tieing together redundant systems with parelleling SD gears turns two independent systems into one co-dependent SD system. In a failure situation, you want to compartmentalize SD the failure. Loosing half your

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
It's not crazy, it's just not reasonable. What I mean, of course, is that in a collocation model, where you have customers bringing in computers, it is not reasonable to mandate that they use DC power. You'd have no customers. Which, in turn, may be a benefit, since you wouldn't need the power

RE: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Temkin, David
Liebert makes one, actually. The model # escapes me, but we considered using it for equipment that's single powered. (We have uber power redundancy..) -Original Message- From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Temkin, David
Here you go: http://www.liebert.com/dynamic/displayproduct.asp?ID=1042cycles=60Hz -Original Message- From: Temkin, David Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:49 PM To: 'E.B. Dreger'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC) Liebert makes one,

RE: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Similar to: http://www.baytech.net/cgi-private/product?catagory=F-RPC+SERIES and isn't Liebert. On Thu, 29 May 2003, Temkin, David wrote: Here you go: http://www.liebert.com/dynamic/displayproduct.asp?ID=1042cycles=60Hz -Original Message- From: Temkin, David Sent:

For your amusement, a graphical demonstration: They all suck!

2003-05-30 Thread Bill Woodcock
http://www.zocalo.net/woody/photos/03.05-Misc/removing-batteries.jpg http://www.zocalo.net/woody/photos/03.05-Misc/ballooned-batteries.jpg Yes, that is in fact a _Model T truck axle_. And I thought I was only keeping it around as a LART. :-) -Bill

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Kevin Day
Too bad a substantial amount of equipment doesn't allow for redundant plugins. The ability to plug { servers | routers | whatever } into two totally separate power feeds is nice. Anyone for building a rackmount transfer switch for two inputs? Assuming it didn't fail (!) -- would the economies

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes

2003-05-30 Thread Jack Bates
Dan Hollis wrote: ok, what UPSes do telcos use (besides their monster battery arrays) What's wrong with our monster battery arrays? -Jack

Re: UPS failure modes

2003-05-30 Thread Jack Bates
nicholas harteau wrote: We run a configuration similar to this, except we do failure per-row with one APC Symmetra supporting between 3 and 6 cabinets, depending on the projected load. In the past 2.5(?) years, we've had one controller failure that did not cause an outage. All the batteries are

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Alex Rubenstein
We have two MGE 150KVA UPSes at our Newton facility. When I designed the electrical system, I originally specified a make-before-break 208V 450A 3PH switch. What is the saying, the lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client?? :) This would enable us to isolate our internal

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote: Dan Hollis wrote: ok, what UPSes do telcos use (besides their monster battery arrays) What's wrong with our monster battery arrays? They dont tend to fit in 19 rackmounts -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread Timothy Brown
We are a Powerware house. We had a large number of 3kVA and 6kVA units in our previous data centre (no-one would stump up the cash for a large unit so we had to buy them as we needed them). After about 5 years (very rough figure), we've now had 3 or 4 units fail, sometimes in the UPS,

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes

2003-05-30 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 29 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote: Dan Hollis wrote: ok, what UPSes do telcos use (besides their monster battery arrays) What's wrong with our monster battery arrays? They dont tend to fit in 19 rackmounts You wouldn't mount a monster array

Re: dnsbl's? - an informal survey

2003-05-30 Thread listuser
I do on the ISP I consult with. We use: dialups.mail-abuse.org (we pay for this) relays.mail-abuse.org (we pay for this) relays.osirusoft.com (all of it, 8 zones, 3 from outside sources) spamhaus.relays.osirusoft.com proxy.relays.osirusoft.com socks.relays.osirusoft.com

Re: They all suck! Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at NAC)

2003-05-30 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Sean Donelan wrote: The most annoying thing about UPSes is they fail at exactly the time they are needed most. Like tape drives.. ok, what UPSes do telcos use (besides their monster battery arrays)

Off topic - New Nanog gene

2003-05-30 Thread Joseph T. Klein
In recognition of that power, the researchers have named the gene nanog, a reference to the mythological Celtic land of Tir Nan Og, whose fairy-like residents are said to stay forever young. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55817-2003May29.html -- Joseph T. Klein This space

Re: Off topic - New Nanog gene

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Boyle
At 12:28 AM 5/30/2003 -0500, Joseph T. Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In recognition of that power, the researchers have named the gene nanog, a reference to the mythological Celtic land of Tir Nan Og, whose fairy-like residents are said to stay forever young.

AS number consolidation

2003-05-30 Thread Michael . Dillon
Does anyone know of case studies of companies collapsing multiple ASes into one on their network? I have the Allegiance Telecom presentation from NANOG 27 but I would like to hear how other people have done it as well. --Michael Dillon

IANA reserved Address Space

2003-05-30 Thread Brennan_Murphy
I'm tasked with coming up with an IP plan for an very large lab network. I want to maximize route table manageability and router/firewall log readability. I was thinking of building this lab with the following address space: 1.0.0.0 /8 10.0.0.0 /8 100.0.0.0 /8 I need 3 distinct zones which is

The Cidr Report

2003-05-30 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri May 30 21:46:19 2003 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table

Re: IANA reserved Address Space

2003-05-30 Thread bmanning
networks 1 and 100 are reserved for future delegation. network 10 is delegated for private networks, such as your lab. if you use networks 1 and 100, you are hijacking these numbers. that said, as long as your lab is never going to connect to the Internet, you may want to consider using the

RE: AS number consolidation

2003-05-30 Thread David Luyer
Does anyone know of case studies of companies collapsing multiple ASes into one on their network? I have the Allegiance Telecom presentation from NANOG 27 but I would like to hear how other people have done it as well. We have to date collapsed 6 AS numbers into 1. Approach was

Decent Colo Facilities

2003-05-30 Thread matt
Hi, Other than the fire recently at NAC in their NJ NOC. Does anyone have any positive or negative feedback about NAC? Also does anyone have any recommendations about a decent colo facility? Feel free to contact me off list. Matt

RE: IANA reserved Address Space

2003-05-30 Thread Brennan_Murphy
Others have pointed out that I should stick to RFC 1918 address space. But again, this is a lab network and to use the words of another, one of the things I want to do is make it much easier to parse visually my route tables. Think of it as a metric system type of numbering plan. The 1 and 100