On Fri, 08 Aug 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Evidence suggests some Network Solutions people read this list, but
> are unlikely to reply to queries such as mine. That's fine, but if
> one of you could suggest to the people in the right place that there
> are many valid e-mail addresses not in that
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:13:25AM -0400, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
> What is the proper way to deal with a company that is unresponsive to
> any form of contact. IE they have outdated information on their ip
> assignments, bounce every piece of e-mail that I send? (including
> postmaster@ which is
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Jason Greenberg wrote:
>
> Can I have some suggestions on how to load balance servers that are on
> seperate IP blocks? Is there any way to perform translation at this
> level? Exclude DNS based balancing please...
vrrp on FreeBSD is supposed to be a free solution to allow
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:58:19AM +, Paul Vixie quacked:
>
> could someone here who can write win32 apps, and someone else who can
> write cocoa apps, please volunteer short executables that will try to
> spoof a few packets through some well known server, and then report as
> to whether the
>> And so we should do nothing?
> No, but neither should we plan on engineering a solution.
not necessarily. as i have been trying to point out for some years,
look at bellovin's presentation at a nanog a few years ago on "pushback"
(sorry, i am on dialup and searches are a major pain). that is
