hi,
Can anyone help me convert a 100MB Ethernet interface to an OC-3 POS
interface in a small cheap box ?
thanks,
Gil
Subject says all :-)
i am in urgent need of a bgp engineer from cogentco.
their noc isn't helpful at all, no answer (except a ticket #)
--jan
--
Jan Czmok, Network Engineering Support, Global Access Telecomm, Inc.
Ph.: +49 69 299896-35 - fax: +49 69 299896-40 - sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does this sound for a new mail distribution network.
Customers can only send mail through their direct provider
ISPs can only send mail to their customers and their upstream provider.
Sounds like NIMTP. See Google for more...
--Michael Dillon
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Gil Levi wrote:
Can anyone help me convert a 100MB Ethernet interface to an OC-3 POS
interface in a small cheap box ?
Depends on what you mean by cheap? Ethernet-POS isn't a conversion per
say, but it could be switched or routed. The more expensive part will
probably be
On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 08:26 Canada/Eastern, Andy Walden wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Gil Levi wrote:
Can anyone help me convert a 100MB Ethernet interface to an OC-3 POS
interface in a small cheap box ?
Depends on what you mean by cheap? Ethernet-POS isn't a conversion
per
say, but it
David has no posting rights on nanog, so i proxing his request:
A Montreal Worldcom DS3 hub is reported down disrupting
connectivity. Can this be confirmed? Is there any estimated
time for completion/restoration?
Many thanks.
--
Best wishes,
David
David Rose
Call 860 228 8912
Cell 860 377
I've got a cisco MC3810 with a bunch of DSL customers on it. CEF is
enabled, but when I do a show int stat, I see that almost 100% of the
outbound packets on the ethernet interface are process switched, and not
being matched in the route cache. The Input looks just fine, and the other
Not sure on the MC3810 (never used one), but I know that many of the
other Cisco routers didn't do CEF on ethernet until later revisions of
code... There are other factors that kick it out of CEF as well.. I
believe ACL's and Route Maps are 2 of them..
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 11:07, Austad, Jay
It's 12.2 code. show ip int e0 shows that CEF is enabled on the interface.
Supposedly 12.2's CEF also handles policy routing (which is not being used
on this router).
-Original Message-
From: Jason Frisvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:24 AM
To:
And getting the lead time down to 4-6 weeks would be a challenge -
remember you have to *ship* the re-mastered patch CD to every retailer
and get it on the shelves. That's going to hit your bottom line.
Ever heard of Windows 98?
How about Windows 98 SE (Second Edition)?
Windows 98SE was
A certain network last week decided to drop *all* icmp traffic across its
network for an indefinate period of time. They did this to reduce the
effects of Nachi. Apparently (their) Redback DSL concentrators cannot
filter only 92 byte packets, it's all or none.
Does anyone else care to respond
ACL's are done in the CEF path also as long as you
don't have the log keyword on it that causes a punt.
Check the 'sh int stat' from the ingress interfaces and
see which ones are showing inbound process hits.
Rodney
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:33:54AM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
It's 12.2
I used to help design these products and I veified them
http://www.luminous.com/
-HenryAndy Walden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Gil Levi wrote: Can anyone help me convert a 100MB Ethernet interface to an OC-3 POS interface in a small cheap box ?Depends on what you mean by cheap?
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Andrew Staples wrote:
A certain network last week decided to drop *all* icmp traffic across its
network for an indefinate period of time. They did this to reduce the
effects of Nachi. Apparently (their) Redback DSL concentrators cannot
filter only 92 byte packets, it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failing that, why can't they bundle up just the updates onto a CD that is
released every few months and shipped out to all of their regular
customers along with permission to copy and redistribute. That way more
OEM's would ship out fully updated machines.
Because
Jack Bates wrote:
At some point, patching and maintaining security needs to be handled
at the connection. If the protocol is written, the ISP supports it,
then those with connection software supporting the protocol will
maintain security while those circumventing it with other connection
Petri Helenius wrote:
How long until the next worm/virus/trojan would first disable this
handshake and then attach
to the network? Or you expect to terminate customers within the 24 hours
new patches
are out if they don´t patch? or 72 hours?
I fully expect malicious code and even users to
(whois.arin.net once again resolves, thanks Rodney Joffe who
seems to have gotten this fixed before I could reply to him)
Now today:
route-views.oregon-ix.netsh ip bgp 63.0.0.0/8
BGP routing table entry for 63.0.0.0/8, version 1548358
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table
Now: what is ln.net's excuse for not updating the ARIN registration
for AS 226 since 1991?
'cause it hasn't changed since 1991?
(more longevity than most registration/whois operators...
not bad Walt!)
...can't keep it's own ASN record up to date?
bye,Kai
Hello All,
A few months ago someone posted a URL to a tool that maps the Internet
from the perspective of any (inputted) AS Number. Could someone send
this URL (on- or off-list)?
I've searched the archives, but I cannot find it.
Thanks,
Michael
hey
are you looking something like that?
http://www.netlantis.org/index.php?menu=2page=gasp
Mehmet Akcin
- Original Message -
From: H. Michael Smith, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:02 PM
Subject: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table
This is the only one that comes to mind,
http://www.fixedorbit.com/search.htm
-Mike
---
Michael Damm, MIS Department, Irwin Research Development
V: 509.457.5080 x298 F: 509.577.0301 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: H. Michael Smith, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps it was this one?
http://lab.verat.net/Jaspvi/
If memory serves, I harvested the above-referenced engineering
trip toy from this list.
ymmv,
--ra
--
K. Rachael Treu, CISSP rara at navigo dot com
..mea culpa..
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:02:27PM -0400, H. Michael Smith, Jr. said
At 21:15 08/09/2003, Randy Bush wrote:
We use CW directly and Verio/Level3 through a peer.
a peer gives you their peer or transit routes?
randy
I've given peers other peer routes before now, but not transit (except in
emergencies). I've done it for several reasons:-
1) You can have transit to
I've given peers other peer routes before now
^ customers
Can anyone here point me to T1 bandwidth providers in Belize,
specifically Belize City, San Pedro, and Caye Caulker?
(Preferably not via BTL, and not satellite links)
--
/-
Marius Strom | Always carry a short
Hello All,
Does anyone have any experience with MPLS tunnels and vpns while using
Multilink PPP or FR bundles? We're looking to see if this is a viable
option for one of our deployments and if there are operational issues
related to this configuration.
Regards,
Wayne
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Can anyone here point me to T1 bandwidth providers in Belize,
specifically Belize City, San Pedro, and Caye Caulker?
(Preferably not via BTL, and not satellite links)
ROTFL!! I've spent more time in Belize, esp. BC, than I wish.
Generally, you get paved roads and working telco service BEFORE
you can buy T1's..
And isn't BTL the legislated monopoly carrier? (Although I heard rumours
that this was supposed to change at some point ...)
I suspect satellite is your only option.
--lyndon
Monopoly status for BTL expired December 31, 2002.
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Generally, you get paved roads and working telco service BEFORE
you can buy T1's..
And isn't BTL the legislated monopoly carrier? (Although I heard rumours
that this was supposed to
30 matches
Mail list logo
