Hi All,
My appologies for the public post, I'd have rather replied to the
individuals who mailed me in response of a previous post, however time
has passed and I have a huge inbox, and of course I would like to
solicit more entries from those interested and just waiting to see what
it is.
The
Hello all,
I dont suppose anyone here might have a direct contact for the people at
Road Runner in regards to DNS management and/or their abuse desk?
Contact me off-list please. Thanks.
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resour
If someone from Google could contact me, I would appreciate it (or someone give up a
good one).
Thanks,
--
Jeff Nelson
Rackspace Managed Hosting
Office: (210) 892 4025 x1601
GnuPG KeyID: 0x7DE7C4E0 @pgp.mit.edu
AS Caretaker: 10532 15395 25897 27357 30099
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I may not agree with everything that William does
> or how he goes about it, but I do think that his
> approach is worthwhile.
Indeed; I like the "economy of ideas" concept myself and in this case it
might be the only valid initial approach, see below.
> It gives us a chanc
This group didn't need anyones permission to form and share idea's and methods
that benefits the entire industry, and it was in the time of great need when these
things came to pass
I see the word's law and legislation and I see people without a clue making law
that only benefits those that p
I answered questions posed here on related inet-access mail list thread
and there is also info there on my previous post why the accusations had
had basis for it. Those who are interested may read it there or in archives
and Susan will I'm sure welcome me not taking any more of nanog resource
on
>i am just curious... do you have any authority/commission from arin (or
>anyone else)?
>this is certainly not flame bait, but it is an honest question. you're
>very self-righteous, and although you may have valid points (i withold
>judgement) i really want to know what gives you the right/aut
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> P.S. Note to other - this thread may have happened because of recent
> thread on layer42 on inet-access mail list. While I generally answer
> accusations, I'm not the one who starts such threads and do not think its
> approriate for nanog mail list,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:43:59PM -0500, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
> Packets are fragmented into equally sized units to prevent further
> downstream fragmentation.
For amusement's sake, in response to a challenge from Crist Clark,
here's code to do it right. Pretty simple, although I have no idea
ho
"On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Blaxthos wrote:"
> hello,
>
> i've been reading nanog-l/inet-access for many many years (just a shadow,
> i don't post).
Hello shadow of anonymous nanog & inet-access subscriber...
I do first have to wonder if you have read newspapers or seen tv shows
like 60 minutes rece
Joe Maimon wrote:
Tony Rall wrote:
On Wednesday, 2003-12-03 at 09:38 PST, David Sinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was
wondering would it not be wiser for fraggers to frag in half instead
of just the overflow?
I noticed today this URL
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswr
I think that most people with clue will realize that every time he
mentions or posts something thats about 50-90% innacurate, he damages his
own credibility anyways.
A lot of the stuff I've seen in regard to this issue is almost comical,
and I wonder who picked on him so badly that he decided to
On 10 Dec 2003 19:49 UTC Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> the nanog-l is not WILLIAM LEIBZON's personnal hatered list. If he
|> wants people to read on his stuff, he can just start his own list.
|
| Actually, he has his own mailing list, and it is closed to the public.
| You can read
If people are speeding in my neighborhood, I can not go and take down
their pictures, personal information, license plate numbers, etc., post
them publically, and accuse them of breaking the law (even if they did!).
Yes you can.
That's liabel,
It is not libel, that they were speeding is a true s
I apologize for further troll feeding, but, I think this warrants some
clarification...
I take issue with anyone who publicly accuses another entity of wrongdoing
beyond his scope of authority.
You can take issue, but, there is no scope of authority for accusations.
Anyone can make an accusation ag
>> [ sorry to use your msg as a soapbox ]
> I appreciate the apology.
it was not your message to which i was responding. but no
matter.
randy
who found out it's not the kiddies' vacation yet, but just a
snow day in some parts of the country
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 14:34, Christian Malo wrote:
> the nanog-l is not WILLIAM LEIBZON's personnal hatered list. If he wants
> people to read on his stuff, he can just start his own list.
Actually, he has his own mailing list, and it is closed to the public.
You can read it at http://archive.hum
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
> [ sorry to use your msg as a soapbox ]
I appreciate the apology.
I think my point is being missed, however (and hopefully this reply will
help legitimize the situation).
It should be noted that the original post was directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to
May I add that a lot of NANOG people actually use IRC for many reasons.
You would be suprised to learn how many of the people posting to NANOG
chat on a daily basis in a certain #nanog channel. Would you be pissed to
know that I'm an IRCer and I also own NANOG.NET ?
ohh and also, #nanog has memb
Blaxthos wrote:
hello,
i've been reading nanog-l/inet-access for many many years (just a shadow,
i don't post).
i am just curious... do you have any authority/commission from arin (or
anyone else)? or is yours a rogue vigilante mission? does anyone ask you
to undertake the battles you feel ju
[ sorry to use your msg as a soapbox ]
let us not feed the trolls, they do not understand and just
puke it up. procmail is your friend.
randy,
who did not realize that school vacations began this early
bash.org... bash.org... now where have I seen that... AAH YES! So then a
group dedicated solely to efforts at documenting trolling on IRC should be
given credibility as to what is/isn't said on NANOG? Yes there are
members of ICANN, ARIN, and most "tier-1" peers on here. You might even
see bash
- Original Message -
From: "Blaxthos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:00 PM
Subject: Authority
>
> hello,
>
> i've been reading nanog-l/inet-access for many many years (just a shadow,
> i don't post).
>
> i am jus
Blaxthos wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i've been reading nanog-l/inet-access for many many years (just a shadow,
> i don't post).
>
> i am just curious... do you have any authority/commission from arin (or
> anyone else)? or is yours a rogue vigilante mission? does anyone ask you
> to undertake the b
hello,
i've been reading nanog-l/inet-access for many many years (just a shadow,
i don't post).
i am just curious... do you have any authority/commission from arin (or
anyone else)? or is yours a rogue vigilante mission? does anyone ask you
to undertake the battles you feel justified in engagi
25 matches
Mail list logo
