Moreover, they can encrypt zip by password and write password inside the
message. As a result, no one virus scan detect
this virus.
And they will find enough idiots, who opens zip, enter password and run
virus.
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Vierling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Curtis M
Thank you Jim and everyone else who responded. Of 84
replies, 82 resolved correctly. 1 of the failures was
single-server failure during a reload, and I'm a possible
reachability issues as the cause of the other.
Thanks again to all who helped.
-ejay
Anyone happen to know of a contact for Comcast's mail server administrators?
I need to discuss an issue with them about their mail servers mailbombing my
systems from a joe job.
Thanks.
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resource
Ejay,
I found a great link some time ago:
www.dnsstuff.com
http://www.dnsstuff.com/pages/expert.htm
This one has an option to do a lookup to any public DNS server...
Pick some of the random Internation DNS servers and try it out..
It helped me out awhile back when an old DNS hoster still had us
in
You wanna know about USB read this and that doesn't take an MSCEhttp://www.usb.org/faq
Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote:> know", should really investigate this certification.>> >Some of the things you asked were extremely basic.>> What "things"
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
> know", should really investigate this certification.
>
> >Some of the things you asked were extremely basic.
>
> What "things" were these?
How about the question about whether or not a usb ethernet adapter was an
ethernet converter?
You're the o
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Henry Linneweh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:59
Subject: Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:35:05 PST, Henry Linneweh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Everyday th
Consumers are not interested in certificates, they want solutions that are
packaged. Front end services when people sign up for accounts should include
all the tools necessary for survive on any network you provider access to.
-Henry"Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 1, 2004,
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:35:05 PST, Henry Linneweh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Everyday there is a new, news article on this and every day everyone
> panics and eeryday some one says tell the government to make a law, it is time
> to realize that no law is going to do anything for anyone soon. In t
On Mar 1, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
Please do not take this the wrong way, but I thought it was useful
input. Perhaps not to you, but maybe to those who think that getting
their MCSA will teach them all they need to know.
One who thinks these exam topics cover (as you say" "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1
Everyday there is a new, news article on this and every day everyonepanics and eeryday some one says tell the government to make a law, it is timeto realize that no law is going to do anything for anyone soon. In the past wejust took care of the problem
Hi all.
nanog(signal,noise++)
I have a customer that is reporting intermittent
reachability issues to Stormpay.com, and need a off-network
perspective on dns. The end-user reports not being able to
resolve the domain, but it's been okay everywhere I looked.
Most of the complaints have been int
>> In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again
>> DONT CLICK ON ATTACHMENTS UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS
>> YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE SENDING IT.
> If you do something again and again and again and it fails again and
> again and again you ned to ask whe
You wrote:
> In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again DONT
> CLICK ON ATTACHMENTS
> UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE
> SENDING IT.
If you do something again and again and again and it fails again and
again and again you ned
-Original Message-
From: Patrick W.Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
>Please do not take this the wrong way, but I thought it was useful
>input. Perhaps not to you, but maybe to those who think that getting
>their MCSA will teach the
Jeff Shultz wrote:
Okay, from an operational standpoint, who really wants a customer who
would open this as a customer in the first place? It seems like it
takes some seriously stubborn stupidity to do so.
I'm beginning to think that we should start charging like insurance
companies do... the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
> Sent: March 1, 2004 10:38 AM
> To: Todd Vierling
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
>
>
> My point is that the COM/DCOM/OLE/ActiveX is what allo
** Reply to message from "Mike Nice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 1 Mar
2004 07:23:07 -0500
> I just received 2 copies of Bagle.F, embedded inside a password-protected
> zip file. Comes right through a full virus scan undetected.
>
> ---
> Sent: Sunday, Fe
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:14:37 CST, John Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again DONT CLICK
> ON ATTACHMENTS
> UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE
> SENDING IT.
CM Kornbluth wrote "The Marching M
>
> In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again
> DONT CLICK ON ATTACHMENTS
> UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE
> SENDING IT.
Just telling people "Don't do that, it's bad." is sure to fail for the
same reason you can't tell peopl
In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again DONT CLICK ON
ATTACHMENTS
UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE
SENDING IT.
The problem is dumb users who DONT LISTEN. This is mostly the office crowd.
The real imbeciles are people operati
Curtis Maurand wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Todd Vierling wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>>
>>> Sure they doits called COM/DCOM/OLE/ActiveX or whatever they
>>> want to call it this week. Its on every windows system.
>>
>> No, my point was that the majority of newer tro
On Mar 1, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
programs are no gu
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> : Sure they doits called COM/DCOM/OLE/ActiveX or whatever they
> : want to call it this week. Its on every windows system.
>
> No, my point was that the majority of newer trojan mail viruses don't depe
Todd Vierling wrote:
It's as if the modern e-mail viruses are closer to human infections. Only
the clueful are immune. 8-)
I would agree if you had written "... At most the clueful are
immune. %^)
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Curtis Maurand wrote:
: > It's annoying how easily these things spread even though they don't rely on
: > a specific OS vulnerabililty -- hell, it's an executable *in a zipfile*, so
: > it requires opening the zipfile and then running the program inside it. Of
: > course ever
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Todd Vierling wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stephen Milton wrote:
> Yah, "Bagle.C" is the notation used by F-Secure. This is indeed what it
> was.
>
> It's annoying how easily these things spread even though they don't rely on
> a specific OS vulnerabililty -- hell, it's
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
>Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
>programs are no guarantee of fundamental technical understanding.
>P.
Yup, got this one too .. according to nai.com theres a whole bunch of these
variants up to bagle.g .. there is also a netsky.d out today as well
pity nai.com arent updating their dat files as fast as their website :(
Steve
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Mike Nice wrote:
> I just received 2 copies of Bagl
I just received 2 copies of Bagle.F, embedded inside a password-protected
zip file. Comes right through a full virus scan undetected.
---
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 7:04 PM
Subject: Bad girl
I am from Taiwan but I study in Camden, New Jersey now. I
>Network Analyst
>CCNA/MCP/MCSA
Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
programs are no guarantee of fundamental technical understanding.
P.S. If you don't ask the right questions you will never get the right
answers.
> Say such a milter could strip off attachments, replacing them
> with a URL in the email that will allow the recipient to
> download them if they prove clean. It's not an instant
> gratification, but it'll let you distribute the scanning
About 5-6 yrs ago I wrote a system for a customer tha
32 matches
Mail list logo