On Jun 22, 2004, at 11:10 PM, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
David,
Isn't renumbering an obligation?
I am not sure however RFC 2071 Touches on this subject in section 4.2.3
but is ambiguous as to the nature of when the renumber should take
place.
4.2.3 Change of Internet Service Provider
As m
> David,
>
> Isn't renumbering an obligation?
>
> >I wonder if their ARIN application says anything about planning to
> >renumber their existing space from NAC into the newly assigned space...
> >
> >-davidu
It's hard to see how his customer failing to meet obligations to ARIN is
going
David,
Isn't renumbering an obligation?
>I wonder if their ARIN application says anything about planning to
>renumber their existing space from NAC into the newly assigned space...
>
>-davidu
David A. Ulevitch - Founder, EveryDNS.Net
h
On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:40 PM, David Schwartz wrote:
IANAL, seek competent legal advice from a lawyer with experience in
this
area. I'm sure you can work out some sort of compromise where you let
them
keep using their IP space for a reasonable period of time (3 months? 6
months?) and they renumb
> In other words, customer is asking a court to rule whether or not IP space
> should be portable, when an industry-supported organization (ARIN) has
> made policy that the space is in fact not portable. It can be further
> argued that the court could impose a TRO that would potentially negativel
Should a customer be allowed to force a carrier to allow them to announce
non-portable IP space as they see fit to any other carriers of their
choosing when they are no longer buying service from the original carrier
[that the space is assigned to]?
According to ARIN regulations, the space does
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/06/22/tech.spam.reut/index.html
"Consumers who allow their infected computers to send out millions of
"spam" messages could be unplugged from the Internet under a proposal
released Tuesday by six large e-mail providers."
-Hank
What's going on? whois.arin.net is not accepting connections and the
whois search via www.arin.net is dead again.
--
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net
With the lamentable exception of the IRC suggestions, there have been some
very good comments on this. However, in the interest of beating a dead horse
(and not aimed directly at Charles) - Think about stuff like this when
picking your transit providers.
There is some conventional wisdom that In
Dear colleagues
APNIC received the IPv6 address range 2001:4400::/23 from IANA in June 2004
and will be making allocations from this range in the near future.
This announcement is being made for the information of the Internet
community, and so that network configurations such as routing filter
Anyone had any good/bad experiences with the PacketSeeker or PacketShaper product ?
(http://www.packeteer.com/). It looks like a good sub-$10,000 traffic monitor that
will allow you to see all Layers of traffic utilization and reporting. Plus you can
upgrade it to shape traffic with a license a
I never stated that #nanog was the official channel on efnet. I just
suggested that were servers run by Nanog Folks already existing.
Funny you should mention Jared. Did nether.net at one point and time host an
Undernet Server?
-- Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Brown" <[EMAIL
> "Matthew" == Matthew McGehrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
Matthew> There are multiple EFNET servers run by Nanog members
Matthew> including: irc.servercentral.net irc.nac.net
Matthew> irc.easynews.com irc.he.net
Matth
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, James wrote:
> okay people, this is ridiculous.
>
> if you want real-time DOS mitigation, cooperation between ASNs, may I
> introduce you all to:
>
> http://www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
As in most other situations, there's value to having multiple tools.
Different tools are more u
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> Ah., but, then how can we keep the lamers (i.e. wannabes/non
> nanoggers) out effectively? :P
Let me guess, DDoS them away?
IRC is simply the most evil thing ever invented.
BTW, I've actually got two sites that were part of the DDoS to find
okay people, this is ridiculous.
if you want real-time DoS mitigation, cooperation between ASN's, may I
introduce you all to:
http://www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
enough with the irc.nanog.org. given that NANOG group is somewhat of higher
profile, and also given that number of EFNet servers struggle w
Heh, at least I don't have daily splits, and other people besides
assholes are allowed to be opers.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:35:37AM -0400, Christian Malo wrote:
>
> probably not as much as shittynetwireless.net
>
> -chris
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bubba Parker wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe beca
Ah., but, then how can we keep the lamers (i.e. wannabes/non
nanoggers) out effectively? :P
-- Jonathan
andrew matthews wrote:
i thought there was nanog @efnet with a lot of these people on it...
i'm sure there are plenty of chat networks out tehre without having to
start a new one.
On Sun, 2
probably not as much as shittynetwireless.net
-chris
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bubba Parker wrote:
>
> Maybe because efnet sucks? :) *runs*
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
> >
> > Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
> >
> > There are multiple EFNET serve
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:10:55PM -0700, andrew matthews wrote:
>
> Anyone ever done some major flowscan stuff?
Well "major" is in the eye of the beholder, but here's what we do:
http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu/ (aggregated to ~1 OC-12 and Gig-E WAN link)
http://wwwstats.wiscne
Maybe because efnet sucks? :) *runs*
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
>
> Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
>
> There are multiple EFNET servers run by Nanog members including:
> irc.servercentral.net
> irc.nac.net
> irc.easynews.com
> irc.he.net
>
> T
Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
There are multiple EFNET servers run by Nanog members including:
irc.servercentral.net
irc.nac.net
irc.easynews.com
irc.he.net
To name a few.
#nanog
-- Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Bubba Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Reed
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:49 AM
Subject: Inside look at a spammer's business
>
> This site http://rejo.zenger.nl/abuse/1085493870.php has an interesting
> insider's account of running a spamming business and al
If need be, if someone were to actually provide a shell or something
that did have enough bandwidth, I could setup the IRC server there and it
would be fine.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:41:51AM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
>
> On 2004-06-22T08:27-0500, Bubba Parker wrote:
> ) Well if people use this
Why a NANOG IRC server would be targeted, I have no clue. But if that's
the case, count me out.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:41:51AM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
>
> On 2004-06-22T08:27-0500, Bubba Parker wrote:
> ) Well if people use this IRC server, there's definately going to be more
> ) control o
On 2004-06-22T08:27-0500, Bubba Parker wrote:
) Well if people use this IRC server, there's definately going to be more
) control over the channel and server itself. And if needed, other members
) could gain more control server-wide. Let me know if you have any
) questions.
You may find that an I
Well if people use this IRC server, there's definately going to be more
control over the channel and server itself. And if needed, other members
could gain more control server-wide. Let me know if you have any
questions.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0700, andrew matthews wrote:
>
> i thou
On Jun 21, 11:10pm, andrew matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone ever done some major flowscan stuff?
Flowscan is perl, isn't it?
> We tried it once for a while and we had so much traffic our dual zeon
> 3.06ghz system couldn't keep up. The flows just started getting more
How much traffi
This site http://rejo.zenger.nl/abuse/1085493870.php has an interesting
insider's account of running a spamming business and all the support
business that exist to help spammer businesses to survive and thrive.
--Michael Dillon
29 matches
Mail list logo
