> I don't know of any capped service over here, nobody dares take the first
> step.
Not 10 Mbps but: Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider,
capped their ADSL customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a
while. Presumably they lost sufficient business to other (uncapped)
providers
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Not 10 Mbps but: Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider,
> capped their ADSL customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a
> while. Presumably they lost sufficient business to other (uncapped)
> providers that they noticed - the cap
> > Not 10 Mbps but: Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider,
> > capped their ADSL customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a
> > while. Presumably they lost sufficient business to other (uncapped)
> > providers that they noticed - the cap has now been removed.
>
> What did they
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 16 21:43:40 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
...and security, access-controls, etc. have to have a transparency
and ease-of-use factor such that legitimate users don't actively
attempt to bypass it themselves. :-)
- ferg
-- Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Donn S. Parker pointed out controls are ineffective without user
cooperat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
| On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|>Not 10 Mbps but: Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider,
|>capped their ADSL customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a
|>while. Presumably they lost suffic
Evaldo Gardenali wrote:
Here in São Paulo state, Brazil, telefonica (yeah, the same spanish one)
caps ADSL too , they have the 128kbit dsl capped at 500MB, 300kbit
capped at 3000MB, 450kbps capped at 10500MB and 600kbps capped at
2MB. no uncapped service available (except for old contracts), an
<<
It isn't so much that one of our links are flapping all of the time, but in our enterprise we have over 1000 locations, which can be 10 or 15 circuits flapping at one given time. This is more for management/administration reasons, other than just wheather or not the router can with stand the
"Two industry forums plan to merge in hopes of speeding the creation of
multi-service, multi-vendor carrier networks that blend frame relay, ATM
and MPLS into their offerings to customers."
See:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0715forums.html
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engi
Is inbound as-path filtering an efficient way of
preventing routes from entering your bgp table? How
come the filtered routes still show up in the bgp
table and not in the routing table? What is hit on the
CPU?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 17 Jul, 2004
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:00:16 PDT, Jeff Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Such dangerous file attachments included .jpg, .pdf and music files.
Once bitten, twice shy:
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/02/msg00168.html
.JPG's are HTML, didn't you know? :)
pgpLhDo1FDrRe.pgp
De
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:52:07 PDT, Alexei Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> O, noo. You click a button 'I agree' which means nothing for 99.99% of
> people over the world. Here is a difference. Do not expect people to 'agree'
> if you do not enforce them to follow this (and if your system do not
> Is inbound as-path filtering an efficient way of
> preventing routes from entering your bgp table? How
> come the filtered routes still show up in the bgp
> table and not in the routing table? What is hit on the
> CPU?
AFAIK, it shouldn't show up on bgp table if you are filtering inbound to yo
Michel Py wrote:
BitTorrent is a third of p2p traffic in Sweden? Wow. In the US it is a
small blip on the radar.
Should hold water for Sweden too. Wonder why so many of the bittorrent
streams terminate in the US if it's not on your radar. Maybe time for
finetuning the radar ...
Pete
> Steinar Haug wrote:
> Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider, capped their
> ADSL customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a
> while. Presumably they lost sufficient business to other
> (uncapped) providers that they noticed - the cap has now been
> removed.
Ridiculous is the
Here's a small question that might take a big answer.
Is there any open source tools that can help organize and facilitate "Network Change
Processes"?
If not, what are some of the tools you reccomend using to organize and coordinate
moves, adds and changes?
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:51:28PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> Michel Py wrote:
>
> >BitTorrent is a third of p2p traffic in Sweden? Wow. In the US it is a
> >small blip on the radar.
> >
> >
> >
> Should hold water for Sweden too. Wonder why so many of the bittorrent
> streams terminate
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Michel Py wrote:
> Thoughts, anyone?
Personal reflection?
I believe 90% of all households will manage well on 35gig per month, ie
100kilobit/s on average.
Those who need more should be charged let's say $40-50 per month per
megabit used, at least during peak hours. For ea
Do you have 'soft-reconfiguration inbound' on ?
If so it will hit the BGP table but will be marked as received-only.
This allows for re-scanning of the table in order to effect filter and
other changes without a hard reset of the session.
> > Is inbound as-path filtering an efficient way of
>
Apologies if this is off topic but we are looking at time warner telecom
for an upstream connection and I would like to get some info as to
people's experience with this group.. good or bad. Off-list is fine..
especially if this is indeed OT.
begin:vcard
fn:Matt Hess
n:Hess;Matt
org:LiveWire Ne
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Private FTP sites seem to be more common among those who trade
> unlicensed, copyrighted material for profit. This is clearly
> criminal. Certainly this isn't what your average P2P user is doing.
Has anyone ever done a money trail investigation rega
Michel Py wrote:
Thoughts, anyone?
If the cap is based on financial requirements, it usually makes sense to
set the cap around 90 to 95 percentile mark of your user base. This
makes it fairly network dependent. Even on residential-heavy networks
the p2p user population is a smallish fraction
> > I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those
> > profiting directly from CWS) that would complain if a provider were to
> > do such a thing...
> ...
> It's the old: "I don't want some plumber deciding what can come down my
> pipe" argument.
that analogy won't stretch to f
Hello all.
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that might effect its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is, t
>> A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose,
>> CA) is looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose
>> connectivity and location is off any faultline, or away from other
>> malady, that might effect its main servers datacenter or
>> connectivity. Problem is, t
Might anyone have any recommendations for datacenters and or ways I can best
determine this?
It does me no good to go to a datacenter whose connectivity also comes
from the same peeing points or fiber that would be effected or take down a
data center in South Bay. Despite being off faultline.
w
You mean that they're not near any *known* fault lines. Remember
Northridge?
If you're in CA or NV, you *are* near a fault line, no matter where you
are.
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/122-39.htm
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm
Tony
On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Jonathan
Sacramento
-joe
On 7/16/04 4:34 PM, "Tony Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You mean that they're not near any *known* fault lines. Remember
> Northridge?
>
> If you're in CA or NV, you *are* near a fault line, no matter where you
> are.
>
> http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/1
Nicole wrote:
A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
location is off any faultline, or away from other malady, that might effect its
main servers datacenter or connectivity. Problem is, th
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> A company I work with (who's servers are located in the San Jose, CA) is
> looking to setup some backup servers at a datacenter whose connectivity and
> location is off any faultline, or away from other malady
>>> Michel Py wrote:
>>> BitTorrent is a third of p2p traffic in Sweden? Wow. In
>>> the US it is a small blip on the radar.
>> Petri Helenius wrote:
>> Should hold water for Sweden too. Wonder why so many of the
>> bittorrent streams terminate in the US if it's not on your
>> radar. Maybe time f
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:15:53PM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
>
> >>> Michel Py wrote:
> >>> BitTorrent is a third of p2p traffic in Sweden? Wow. In
> >>> the US it is a small blip on the radar.
>
> >> Petri Helenius wrote:
> >> Should hold water for Sweden too. Wonder why so many of the
> >> bitto
> Jonathan Nichols
> www.ragingwire.com
> Their data center is not near any fault lines. In fact,
> it's not near much of anything... except Sacramento. :)
Yep. Keep in mind that W.Tasman to Sacramento is a 2 hour drive at any
given time and 3 1/2 hours on a Friday afternoon. Also, if you enjoy
n
Yep. Keep in mind that W.Tasman to Sacramento is a 2 hour drive at any
given time and 3 1/2 hours on a Friday afternoon. Also, if you enjoy
night life, Sacramento is not the best location on earth.
Yeah, that's something else to consider. Sometimes it's faster to take
Amtrak than it is to drive.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > Private FTP sites seem to be more common among those who trade
> > unlicensed, copyrighted material for profit. This is clearly
> > criminal. Certainly this isn't what your average P2P user is doi
36 matches
Mail list logo
