Re: Registrars serve no useful purpose

2005-01-22 Thread Steve Sobol
Joe Rhett wrote: What if a company doesn't want to deal with any registrar? What if they just want to register their domain name and have it stay registered. I really can't think of any domain name registrant that this statement doesn't apply to -- even the spammers. The purpose is so that someo

Emergency Internet Backbone Provider Maintenance Tonight

2005-01-22 Thread Darrell Kristof (CE CEN)
All: Has anyone heard about some carriers doing emergency maintenance tonight on Internet routers due to a code vulnerability? I'm trying to find out what vendor it involves and the details behind it. I understand it's still under NDA, but I'm sure someone out there knows more. Thanks, - Darr

Re: Emergency Internet Backbone Provider Maintenance Tonight

2005-01-22 Thread Todd Mitchell - lists
On 22/01/2005 8:52 PM Darrell Kristof (CE CEN) wrote: > Has anyone heard about some carriers doing emergency maintenance tonight > on Internet routers due to a code vulnerability? I'm trying to find out > what vendor it involves and the details behind it. I understand it's > still under NDA, but

RE: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process)

2005-01-22 Thread John Curran
At 11:02 PM +1100 1/19/05, Bruce Tonkin wrote: >Hello John, > >> >> It appears that "REGISTRAR LOCK" has interesting >> per-registrar implementation variations which do not always >> put the domain holder's interests first. While the registry >> does not, per se, have a direct business interest w

Re: Emergency Internet Backbone Provider Maintenance Tonight

2005-01-22 Thread matthew zeier
One of my upstreams did so on the transit router we connect to. - Original Message - From: "Darrell Kristof (CE CEN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 7:52 PM Subject: Emergency Internet Backbone Provider Maintenance Tonight All: Has anyone heard about some ca

Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process)

2005-01-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:29 EST, John Curran said: > If you believe that REGISTRAR LOCK meets the need, then I've failed > to adequately communicate my requirements. The requirement is my > domain remains unchanged despite complete failure or fraud of any > number of registrars. Do you have a r

Re: broke Inktomi floods?

2005-01-22 Thread Gadi Evron
All Inktomi/Yahoo crawling is done from 68.142.248.0/22; the whois entry for that block says to report issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have you tried alerting them to the problems yet? If yes, and if you didn't receive a response, please forward me the mail that you sent, and I'll see to it that the r