On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Edward B. Dreger wrote:
> DA> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
> DA> From: Dean Anderson
>
> DA> And it violates RFC 1546, as previously explained.
>
> Who cares? You've railed against SMTP+AUTH because it's not a
> "standard". Why do you give a rat's rump abou
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> > So agreeing for a second with Dean that indeed this behaviour would appear
> > to be
> > prohibited or at least inconsistent with the RFCs, the fact is anycast is
> > widely
> > deployed and is pro
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> So agreeing for a second with Dean that indeed this behaviour would appear to
> be
> prohibited or at least inconsistent with the RFCs, the fact is anycast is
> widely
> deployed and is proven to be stable.
"vixie-cast" is deployed on around 60
on Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 07:41:34AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> On 4/30/05, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ANantes-106-1-5-107.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr
> >
> > You'll see 'abo' for 'cable', perhaps? as well as 'cable'. But for most
>
> abo = short for "abonnement",
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Steve Gibbard wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Robert M. Enger wrote:
>
> > Steinar:
> >
> > There is a large body of work from competent and well known researchers
> > that assert the claim. I certainly lack standing to question their
> > results.
> >
> > Empirically, do
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:29:05 +0200, Florian Weimer said:
> Ahem, I would expect that people *pay* Apple for inclusion in the
> default RSS list. Why should they be concerned by the extra
> bandwidth?
A company that paid for 500K more eyeballs may get surprised if Tiger is
a huge hit and 5M eyeba
On 4/30/05, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ANantes-106-1-5-107.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr
>
> You'll see 'abo' for 'cable', perhaps? as well as 'cable'. But for most
abo = short for "abonnement", that is, "subscription" / "subscriber"
Just means its a pool of IPs assigned to users, I
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:45:24AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:20:21PM -0400, Peering wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> > Is there something out there (other than a router)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:20:21PM -0400, Peering wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> > Is there something out there (other than a router) that will convert
>> > from OC3c to Gig-E? Feel free to answer offline, don't want to f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
comments in-line:
Dan Hollis wrote:
| On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
|
|>to source is still the big gap. imiho, from the ops perspective,
|>only sally's ecn has made any useful approach. sadly, we may be
|>able to judge the actual demand f
[In the message entitled "RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden" on
Apr 29, 15:32, "Miller, Mark" writes:]
>
> Unfortunately, a lot of static "business" DSL IP space is still on
> those lists and legitimate mail servers can get blocked. I usually use
> the DUL as a "white list" to neg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Miller, Mark wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, a lot of static "business" DSL IP space is still on
>> those lists and legitimate mail servers can get blocked. I usually use
>> the DUL as a "white list" to negate hits on the traditional dn
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:20:21PM -0400, Peering wrote:
> All,
>
> > Is there something out there (other than a router) that will convert
> > from OC3c to Gig-E? Feel free to answer offline, don't want to fill
> > everyone's inbox at once :)
If you are looking for transport, there are many box
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1791152,00.asp
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Well, I have no influence on addressing here, so any comments are mine
alone. A lot of addressing schemes were created in the day before there
was a huge issue with hostile dynamic addresses and the need to be able
to identify them. Addressing assignments, of course, were (and still
are to a la
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Miller, Mark wrote:
> Unfortunately, a lot of static "business" DSL IP space is still on
> those lists and legitimate mail servers can get blocked. I usually use
> the DUL as a "white list" to negate hits on the traditional dnsbls since
> those are almost always stale.
Tha
Unfortunately, a lot of static "business" DSL IP space is still on
those lists and legitimate mail servers can get blocked. I usually use
the DUL as a "white list" to negate hits on the traditional dnsbls since
those are almost always stale.
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
[In the message entitled "Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden" on
Apr 29, 17:23, "Steven J. Sobol" writes:]
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Dave Rand wrote:
>
> > Dunno what a ton of ISP buy-in is, but the MAPS DUL now contains about
> > 190,000,000 entries. We've been working on it very har
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Dave Rand wrote:
> Dunno what a ton of ISP buy-in is, but the MAPS DUL now contains about
> 190,000,000 entries. We've been working on it very hard for the last year or
> two. Most ISP-level subscribers figure it stops a pretty large percentage of
> the compromised-home-co
Title: OC3 to Gig-E conversion
All,
Is there something out there (other than a router) that will convert from OC3c to Gig-E? Feel free to answer offline, don't want to fill everyone's inbox at once :)
Thanks,
Diane Turley
Sr. Network Engineer
Xspedius Communications Co.
636-625-7178
on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:20:37AM -0400, Steve Sobol wrote:
>
> Mark Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:16:36AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> >
> > > Any IP that a provider allows servers on should have
> > > distinctive, non-dynamic-looking DNS (and prefer
We had issues with Level3 earlier in DFW, this was the response I
received from them.
"We had a problem in Dallas that has been recently resolved under T#1270798."
Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Chris Ranch wrote:
Eric Whitehill wrote:
Anyone know what, if anything happened with L
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Alexander Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 29 April 2005 13:04:05 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> > > and we happily overloaded our peers' interfaces at the respective other
> > > IX...
> >
> > That sounds more like a planning issue than anything else. If you have
> > traffic going throu
On April 28, 2005 at 09:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adi Linden) wrote:
> > Its not up to the ISP to determine outbound malicious traffic, but its up
> > to the ISP to respond in a timely manner to complaints. Many (most?) do
> > not.
>
> If they did their support costs would explode. It is block
on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:38:00PM +0930, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:16:36AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
>
> > Any IP that a provider allows servers on should have
> > distinctive, non-dynamic-looking DNS (and preferably be in a separate
> > netblock from the dynami
Can't say we didn't see this debate coming.
Two articles poppped up this afternoon, on virtually the
same topic and at virtually the same time:
Business Inaction Could Lead to Cybersecurity Law
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8348598
[and]
Do We Need a Sarbane
Irwin Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quoted an article saying
"In less than 48 hours many of us will be installing Tiger OS-X and with it a
brand new Safari browser that can read and display RSS feeds in a simple easy
to understand manner. That upgrade while great for the consumers, could come
as a bi
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 30 Apr, 2005
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Chris Ranch wrote:
>
> Eric Whitehill wrote:
> > Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this
> > morning? (8-10am, CDT)
>
> Level3 in LAX is/was fine...
Didn't notice anything in FL either. Must be some new highly localized
meaning for global. :)
--
Level3 in Ft Worth and Dallas was fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Ranch
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:41 AM
To: Eric Whitehill; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Level3 Blip?
Eric Whitehill wrote:
> Anyone know what, if anything
Eric Whitehill wrote:
> Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this
> morning? (8-10am, CDT)
Level3 in LAX is/was fine...
Chris
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:23:35 -0400 (EDT)
Eric Whitehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this morning? (8-10am,
> CDT)
>
I have an Ethernet connection to L3 in Tysons Corner, VA.
I saw no problems at all with unicast / multicast transit or BGP
* Irwin Lazar:
> Some food for thought:
Ahem, I would expect that people *pay* Apple for inclusion in the
default RSS list. Why should they be concerned by the extra
bandwidth?
Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this morning? (8-10am,
CDT)
Nothing on their webpage, but I have some customers jumping up and down
screaming at me about a 'global network outage', and I frankly don't want
to believe them on a Friday. (i.e., I have them showing me a 'global
112 works in the UK but everyone just dials 999 usually
for all the wrong reasons.
> Hm... little question of interest ;)
>
> In Holland the number used to be "06-11", but was changed to a
> so-called European Emergency number ("112"). Does this number also
> work in Germany ? "Back t
>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:00:15 +0200 (MEST)
> > From: Peter & Karin Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP
>
> > [ ... ]
> > In Germany emergency calls are 110 not 911.
> > If they connected me to Tokio police, they dont
> > speak
They've been running six cos for quite some time now actually - I guess
about nine months.. but the actual userbase they've sold the option to
remained with a very limited (but large) customer base.
Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@merit.edu - 28/04/2005 17:14
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:38:00PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I think it's absurd. I expect my water delivery company not to add
> polutants in transit. I expect my water production company to provide
> clean water.
Water delivery is unidirectional, otherwise water utilities would infact
have
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 1:34 PM + 4/29/05, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> >On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I've seen some Cisco security presentations that include sinkholes
> >> composed of an ingress and egress router, interco
How about supporting alternatives to ICANN, which are getting
more and more widespread and accepted like www.public-root.com
and www.inaic.com ?
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rodney Joffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; <[EMAIL
At 1:34 PM + 4/29/05, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I've seen some Cisco security presentations that include sinkholes
composed of an ingress and egress router, interconnected with a
switch. The switch provides access for tools such as packet
a
> Yes, but the difference is that Firefox doesn't come with a
> pre-populated set of news feeds.
Mine did. (although it is aggregated by mozilla)
Mark
--
Mark Segal
Director, Corporate Strategy
FCI Broadband
Tel: 905-284-4070
Fax: 416-987-4701
http://www.fcibroadband.com
> What if more than a million Tiger Safaris were on the loose. Oh boy!
While
> an addition 48 gigabytes of traffic a day or 1.4 terabyte a month is not
> that much for large sites, but it will add up.
An we were all worried about the impact of Internet TV... ;-)
> How about randomizing the who
Yes, but the difference is that Firefox doesn't come with a pre-populated
set of news feeds.
Irwin
> From: Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:10:16 +0100
> To: Irwin Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger
>
> Irwin
>
> Isn't
Irwin
Isn't this a similar mechanism that Firefox allows you do do??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Irwin Lazar wrote:
Some food for thought:
**
This email and any files trans
Some food for thought:
--
http://www.gigaom.com/2005/04/28/rss-tiger-safari-and-the-bandwidth-bottlene
ck/
RSS, Tiger Safari and the Bandwidth Bottleneck
In less than 48 hours many of us will be installing Tiger OS-X and with it a
brand new Safari browser that can read and display RSS feeds in
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> I've seen some Cisco security presentations that include sinkholes
> composed of an ingress and egress router, interconnected with a
> switch. The switch provides access for tools such as packet
> analyzers, IDS, routing analyzers, etc. The mul
Rodney,
Can you compare the past out-reach exercises and the present one?
You know, process and outcomes.
I'm thinking of the process and outcome of the MITF exercise of 2002/3.
It is now seven years since the issue of appropriation of tribal names
was brought to the attention of the ICANN BoD
> With public peering you simply never know how much spare
> capacity your peer has free.
So with your key peers you talk to them and find out, but
I don't see how this is any different if you have a private
interconnect. Just because you have say a STM-1 into another peer
doesn't mean they ha
> > > With public peering you simply never know how much spare
> > > capacity your peer has free.
> >
> > So? That doesn't make public peering bad, you don't know that
> > for PI or transit either
>
> For PI I know how much spare I have towards them, taking for
> granted they can move the traffi
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:08:13PM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> With public peering you simply never know how much spare
> capacity your peer has free.
You also never know with private peering: Backbone links.
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
On Fri, 29 April 2005 13:24:06 +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
> > With public peering you simply never know how much spare
> > capacity your peer has free.
>
> So? That doesn't make public peering bad, you don't know that
> for PI or transit either
For PI I know how much spare I have towards
> With public peering you simply never know how much spare
> capacity your peer has free.
So? That doesn't make public peering bad, you don't know that
for PI or transit either
> And would you expect your
> peer with 400 Mbit/s total to have 400 reserved on his AMSIX
> port for you when you see
On Fri, 29 April 2005 13:04:05 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> > and we
> > happily overloaded our peers' interfaces at the respective
> > other IX...
>
> That sounds more like a planning issue than anything else. If you
> have traffic going through a pipe, then you need to make sure you have
>
> and we
> happily overloaded our peers' interfaces at the respective
> other IX...
That sounds more like a planning issue than anything else. If you
have traffic going through a pipe, then you need to make sure you have
somewhere else to send it. If you are managing your peers properly,
priva
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 29 21:44:46 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
I've seen some Cisco security presentations that include sinkholes
composed of an ingress and egress router, interconnected with a
switch. The switch provides access for tools such as packet
analyzers, IDS, routing analyzers, etc. The multiple routers also
provide more horsepower for inspection
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050428/39757635.html
This makes Russia sound like some insane place where Big Brother
spies on the communications of all citizens,
The changes there in last 4 years seem to be in that direction. Plus also
their system of peop
On 4/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Federal Security Service proposes setting new rules for Internet
>
> This makes Russia sound like some insane place where Big Brother
> spies on the communications of all citizens, like in the United States.
Here's a hint.. the FSB
> Who exactly will I be talking to when I dial 911 from an internet cafe
> in Puerto Vallarta through my Virgina VOIP account with a California
> Billing address?
Even more interesting, what if you have a heart attack and a
helpful local picks up your phone and dials 060? Normally,
in Puerto Vall
> http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050428/39757635.html
>
> The Federal Security Service proposes setting new rules for Internet
> providers so that it could prevent the spread of extremist ideas, track
> down illegal online operations, and get access to databases with mobile
> telephone subscribers' d
>
> On 29-apr-2005, at 3:12, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> >> Maybe a satellite network that continuously transmit location
> >> beacon information which can be used to triangulate one's
> >> location would
> >> do the trick?
>
Skype and public domain telefones dont know about location,
nor will
[In the message entitled "Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden" on
Apr 28, 10:20, "Steve Sobol" writes:]
> There are some basic rules of thumb you can use. The problem is that they're
> not guaranteed to work. The best solution was created years ago (Gordon
> Fecyk's DUL, which lists IP
On 29-apr-2005, at 3:12, Owen DeLong wrote:
Maybe a satellite network that continuously transmit location
beacon information which can be used to triangulate one's
location would
do the trick?
I submit that I don't necessarily want my communications device or my
location tracked at all times b
Hi,
I just noticed the allocation of 2001:48a8::/32 to MERIT, does this mean
NANOG is going to be available over IPv6 soon ? :)
BTW: google's allocation is already visible in the routing tables,
microsoft has one but it is not visible (yet)
Greets,
Jeroen
--
OrgName:Merit Network Inc.
Org
Folks,
The archives of NANOG are riddled with complaints and comments about the
lack of competent representation and influence for the networking community
within the ICANN world. So this is your opportunity to make your voice heard
through action that actually carries influence. And responsibili
66 matches
Mail list logo
