Microsoft is announcing a new subscription-based computer fix-it service
to automatically patch security holes, virus, spyware and automate
maintaining unmanaged PCs such as those found at home.
Most importantly it includes live support calls as part of the
subscription fee.
So imagine a residential area all pulling digital video over wireless.
Sound familiar? Ironically close to TV! (yet so different)
What I can't understand is why multicast hasn't just gone gangbusters into
use yet. I see it as a really pent-up capability that, in light of
Because multicast
Other is CCR (Cisco Configuration Repository), derived from here:
snmpstat.sf.net
- Original Message -
From: joshua sahala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: ACL Monitoring
On (12/05/05 17:14), Paul Ryan wrote:
All - I am
Used in CCR, and adapted for
Cisco IOS
Cisco Catos
Pix OS
Cisco VPN 3000 os
Really nice thing.
- Original Message -
From: Glynn Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: ACL Monitoring
If you anticipate doing a lot of
It's all done in CCR. It encrypts passwords (allowing you to have a few
password groups, all WEB configurable), and uses
passphrases + 3DES or public/private key encryption (or just you can enter
logi and password from the web).
idea is simple - operators have WEB access and know passphrase, but
So imagine a residential area all pulling digital video over wireless.
Sound familiar? Ironically close to TV! (yet so different)
Yes, so different...
Here's why: http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10462
Terabyte Firewire/USB2.0 hard drive for $979
If your network has to feed
And virtualized? ASP (Application Service Providers) were going to
Change
The Computing Environment. Googling for application service
provider gets 2.3
*million* hits. Their *actual* impact? You tell me.
Their impact can't be measured because it spread out into niche
markets. Like blogs
This report has been generated at Fri May 13 21:44:55 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
Alexei Roudnev wrote:
What I can't understand is why multicast hasn't just gone gangbusters into
use yet. I see it as a really pent-up capability that, in light of
Because multicast standards was written by academic idiots. -:) Very
difficult to use and full of unused features.
(Do not
Matthew Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm going for v.90 over VoIP over DSL. Hopefully I'll be able to get
a 28.8k connection over my DSL line ;)
It's astonishingly unreliable, although it could be my setup. V.32 is
marginally more reliable than V.90. Yes, I'm using the G.711a codec.
On Fri, 13 May 2005 11:23:14 BST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Their impact can't be measured because it spread out into niche
markets. Like blogs and wikis and all those photo sites.
And my company's network with 1,000 customers and PoPs in
20 countries all doing 100% ASP traffic. ASPs businesses
Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
there's going to be *plenty* of room for small
flexible operators in niche markets, at both
ends of the pipe.
Agreed. Adding some substance to those words, see:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21312808
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting
-
On
Hi all.
I have a bit of an issue. A while ago, I was issued 204.8.0.0/22 from ARIN
(under ipv4 policy, 4.2.1.5 - the minimum allocation for multihomed
networks). I've just gotten around to announcing it to migrate off of my PA
space. In testing, I've determined that a number of networks are
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:40:45 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 14:32:45 -0400, Joe Loiacono proclaimed...
So imagine a residential area all pulling digital video over wireless.
Sound familiar? Ironically close to TV! (yet so different)
What I can't understand is
On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:42:11 -0700
Gabriel Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I have a bit of an issue. A while ago, I was issued 204.8.0.0/22 from ARIN
(under ipv4 policy, 4.2.1.5 - the minimum allocation for multihomed
networks). I've just gotten around to announcing it to
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
...
Of course, just as new allocations to ARIN or RIPE are announced here,
it may be a good idea to start announcing 2002-3 allocations as well.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
If they aren't on the bogon list then why announce them?
Roy Engehausen
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 14 May, 2005
On Fri, 13 May 2005 11:00:31 -0700
Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
...
Of course, just as new allocations to ARIN or RIPE are announced here,
it may be a good idea to start announcing 2002-3 allocations as well.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
If they aren't
For NANOG34 May 15-17, the following streaming resources will be
available.
Merit Staff will be providing RealNetworks Streaming Media, begining at
0900 PDT Monday. The stream will be linked from the main conference page
at:
http://www.nanog.org/index.html
The U of O videolab will be
For NANOG34 May 15-17, the following streaming resources will be
available.
Merit Staff will be providing RealNetworks Streaming Media, begining at
0900 PDT Monday. The stream will be linked from the main conference page
at:
http://www.nanog.org/index.html
Thanks Joel. Actually we'll
20 matches
Mail list logo
