In a message written on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:07:48PM -0500, Sean Donelan
wrote:
> Verizon is calling their offering "Broadband access." Cablevision calls
> their offering "Optimum Online." Are those the same as "Internet access?"
Depends on what they promise. For instance, if I go to Cable
V
> "bridge where you can, route where you must." -- i forgot where this
> came from? Radia?
Cabletron
At 04:10 PM 12/11/2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 5:19 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
I think, however, that this will be less dramatic than other
things. This is a "relatively" simple software change. The one thing
it *will* do is make sure that all the old hardware out the
Example registered but not 'routed': 7.0.0.0/8
Not a good example.
This particular /8 allocation is described by IANA as "007/8 Apr
95 IANA - Reserved"
in http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space while a whois query
to the ARIN database reveals:
$ whois 7.0.0.0
OrgName:
I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't
seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)
So you how would interpret the combination of RFC4913 and the statistical
analysis known as "the birthday problem"? I offer the interpretation of
this as use of address space
At 05:41 AM 13/11/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
routed where? your router? my router? until/unless
you can look at EVERY router and see this mythical DFP
in ALL of them, then i remain convinced you are deluded.
Such applaudable absolutism does you credit in a ma
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
i suggest, as opposed to the forever chant "operators should
come to ivtf and participate," that more ivtf folk should come
to operational fora and try to participate. with the ivtf's
move to mediocrity and complexity, it is no longer the center
of the uni
RB> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:03:44 -0600 (CST)
RB> From: Robert Bonomi
RB> "Upgrades" or 'fixes' that cause a machine to run noticably _slower_ than
RB> the 'down-rev' machine are a really good way to alienate customers.
Especially
RB> thosw whose machines are running at nearly 100% capacity b
Googlebot keeps ignoring my robots.txt file, thereby hammering the
server and facilitating spam.
I think I found at least 2 bugs; see this thread in the robots.txt forum
thread:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum93/782.htm
I've used Google's direct contact form last Wednesday; still no ack
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
...
I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't
seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)
Yes, there was rfc1918 in IPv6 right from the beginning:
Site local addresses "0xF80" dont leave a site. They can be routed within
a site b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Dambier writes:
>
>Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>>
>...
>>
>> I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't
>> seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)
>>
>
>Yes, there was rfc1918 in IPv6 right from the beginning:
>
>Site local
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Matthew Elvey wrote:
>
> Please don't reply w/o reading the above thread, to avoid repetition.
I have to pay to see it.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
On Nov 13, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Scott Bradner wrote:
"bridge where you can, route where you must." -- i forgot
where this
came
from? Radia?
Cabletron
And before that, Vitalink.
;-)
Tony
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> "access the Internet", could it be more clear?
No, because there is no legal defintion of "the Internet."
During the early days of the privitization of the Internet, you could not
access www.pizzahut.com (on UUNET) from various universities (on NSFNET)
14 matches
Mail list logo
