I have a question about S-BGP. When IP prefix is
aggregated, and a S-BGP speaker receives a route announcement with the
aggregated ip prefix,
how does it verify the authority
of the AS to announce the IP prefix. The aggregated IP
prefix should have not address attestation.
[EMAIL PR
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:20:28 -0800, Dan Hollis proclaimed...
>
> IMO, such disclaimers are incompatible with the nanog ml, anyone posting
> from such disclaimer-encumbered accounts should be forcefully
> unsubscribed. If you can't post from a disclaimer-free account, you
> shouldn't be posti
On 12/2/05, Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMO, such disclaimers are incompatible with the nanog ml, anyone posting
> from such disclaimer-encumbered accounts should be forcefully
> unsubscribed. If you can't post from a disclaimer-free account, you
> shouldn't be posting to the list, pe
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Jay Hennigan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mark Smith wrote:
[Dire threats regarding confidentiality, etc. snipped.]
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:18:52 -0700
"Sam Crooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This confidentiality notice almost DoS'd my MUA !
One would think that those posting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: IOS HTTP Server Command Injection Vulnerability
Document ID: 68322
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20051201-http
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
Can someone summarize the alternatives to the ARIN recommended RWHOIS
server bits (from rwhois.org)? A quick hit on Google and Freshmeat was
fairly barren.
i use irrd
I'm curious how you or anyone else using irrd deals with the following
issues:
1
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kim Onnel wrote:
>
> > Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none solution to cap the
> > download stream traffic, our upstream will not recieve marked traffic from
> > us, so what can be done ?
>
> Step 1: Please ident
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Ejay Hire wrote:
> Going back to your original question, how to keep from
> saturating the network with residential users using
> bittorrent/edonkey et al, while suffocating business
> customers. Here goes.
I still don't see the requirement for application level classificatio
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kim Onnel wrote:
> Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none solution to cap the
> download stream traffic, our upstream will not recieve marked traffic from
> us, so what can be done ?
Step 1: Please identify how you identify your Corp. customers.
Once you exp
So anyway, back to the original post does anyone from GoDaddy have
any information regarding the DDoS?
--
On 12/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:47:17 PST, Jay Hennigan said:
>
> > Has the validity of such language ever been upheld in court?
>
> IAN
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:47:17 PST, Jay Hennigan said:
> Has the validity of such language ever been upheld in court?
IANAL - but apparently the use of it on *some* faxes has stood up in court,
it hasn't been tested on e-mail yet, but a number of people who have written
on it think that the indiscr
But be careful about the CPU usage and platform support for NBAR. I
don't think the sup720 will do NBAR, at least that's what I heard.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kim Onnel wrote:
Our ADSL customers traffic is 3 OC3 worth of traffic, I dont think our
management would buy the idea.
Any way you do limiting depending on any level over L3, you're going to
fail in the long run (people will start to move ports around or go
encrypted).
Sean Donelan wrote:
The problem with waiting until the PE or BRAS to do the classification is
most access providers use traffic aggregation in the access network (e.g.
ATM/DSL, Cable, WiFi, etc). This means the interfaces on the BRAS or PE
are oversubscribed and the access network interface w
There was a 3.0 PDLM release on 11/1/05 for Bittorrent traffic. See
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/pdlm
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ejay
Hire
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:41 AM
To: 'Kim Onnel'
Cc: 'NANGO'
S
There are a bunch of p2p and torrent custom classifier pdlm's at
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/pdlm
Quoting Ejay Hire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I got an off-list reply about using Nbar, but I've never
> seen a class map that would match torrent.
>
> -e
>
> > -Original Messag
I got an off-list reply about using Nbar, but I've never
seen a class map that would match torrent.
-e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Kim Onnel
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:12 AM
> To: Ejay Hire
> Cc: NANGO
> Subject: Re
Our ADSL customers traffic is 3 OC3 worth of traffic, I dont think our management would buy the idea.
thanksOn 12/1/05, Ejay Hire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.Going back to your original question, how to keep fromsaturating the network with residential users usingbittorrent/edonkey et al, whil
Hello.
Going back to your original question, how to keep from
saturating the network with residential users using
bittorrent/edonkey et al, while suffocating business
customers. Here goes.
Netfilter/IpTables (and a slew of commercial products I'm
sure) has a Layer 7 traffic classifier, meaning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's hard to imagine an organization who can afford to run
a network using BGP to announce a class C block and not
be able to afford $1250 per year.
The Internet != for-profit-only corporate netspace.
In that case, the organization is not an ISP which
means that they
> > It's hard to imagine an organization who can afford to run
> > a network using BGP to announce a class C block and not
> > be able to afford $1250 per year.
>
> The Internet != for-profit-only corporate netspace.
In that case, the organization is not an ISP which
means that they are not grow
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mark Smith wrote:
[Dire threats regarding confidentiality, etc. snipped.]
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:18:52 -0700
> "Sam Crooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This confidentiality notice almost DoS'd my MUA !
One would think that those posting here would have the clue to rea
Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none solution to cap
the download stream traffic, our upstream will not recieve marked
traffic from us, so what can be done ?On 11/29/05, Kim Onnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have Juniper ERX as BRAS for ADSL, its GigE interfa
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:18:52 -0700
"Sam Crooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This confidentiality notice almost DoS'd my MUA !
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message, and any attachments, are intended only for the lawful and
> specified use of the individual or entity to which it is addres
It could be a DoS that used a software vulnerability though.On 12/1/05, Christopher L. Morrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Sam Crooks wrote:> the source I have seen so far is:
>>> http://news.com.com/GoDaddy.com+suffers> +outage/2110-7349_3-5977187.html?tag=nefd.hed>stuck through
25 matches
Mail list logo
