On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:53:06PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity, you
can be pretty sure that a marker expressly designed to state the
message Hi, I'm anonymous! will
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:58:34AM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity,
you can be pretty sure that a marker expressly designed to state
the
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:58:34AM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity,
you can be pretty sure that a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:37:25PM +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
How an open proxy that will not connect to port 25 is relevant for
an *email* blacklist is beyond me.
Perhaps because SORBS is not just an email blacklist?
My bad. I must have misunderstood its
If anyone has a contact for the dns folks over at af.mil could you please
inform them that their authorative DNS servers have no A records so their
zone is failing to resolve for many people who have enabled anti-dnscache
poisoning features.
George Roettger
Netlink Services
We're notifying them via JTF-GNO (DOD-CERT).
As it relates to .mil's you can get to their site here: http://www.jtfgno.mil/
On government or .gov's you can reach us at www.us-cert.gov
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Geo. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 08:42 AM
If you know where I could lay my hands on a few (5 at most) 5 meter
multimode duplex LC-LC jumpers in the Pittsburgh, PA area, please shoot me
a note off-list.
Thanks
jms
Sending your email to all three
-Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Elijah Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comcast.net, Usa.net, Verizon
Are there anyone on
hey guys,
any luck? i actually need to find someone at comcast with clue as well.
any help you could provide would be most appreciated.
/blax
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Dennis Dayman wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:39:20 -0500
From: Dennis Dayman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Elijah Savage' [EMAIL
On 6/22/06, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of my discussions with Tor people have indicated [they] do not
think I should have the right to deny traffic based on IP address,
and that I should find other methods of authenticating traffic into
my networks.
Isn't it rather
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:18:35 -0400, Ron Bonica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
In Section 1 of your draft, you say:
The proper solution involves some sort of key management protocol.
Apart from the complexity of such things, RFC 2385 was not written
with key changes in mind.
On 22-jun-2006, at 23:17, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Why not correct the protocol deficiency by introducing a new
option that
includes a KeyID? Wouldn't that approach provide a more comprehensive
solution to the problem?
That's a much better long-term strategy, though the exact mechanism
How often do you think keys should change?
Arguably, any time someone who had access to the key is no longer
supposed
to have such access.
I've never had anyone ask
to change keys for about 50 session-years.
I guess the question the question is whether that's because they
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115102893799688389.html
In Event of Big Web Disruption, U.S. Is Ill-Prepared, Study Says
By VAUHINI VARA
June 23, 2006; Page B2
The U.S. is poorly prepared for a major disruption of the Internet,
according to a study that an influential group of chief executives
On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:45 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
The U.S. is poorly prepared for a major disruption of the Internet,
according to a study that an influential group of chief executives
will
publish today.
The Business Roundtable, composed of the CEOs of 160 large U.S.
companies,
said
15 matches
Mail list logo
