SMB> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:40:02 -0400
SMB> From: Steven M. Bellovin
[ snipping points to which I'm not responding ]
SMB> The third is that not all the world is a web site.
Indeed, different apps have different requirements. SRV-ish granularity
would be useful.
Eddy
--
Everquick Interne
It appears that some of the queries are valid for an older site that
existed in the past. That site was a wiki and some of the Giga hits are
for internationalized versions of the default help/support pages. This
is fine and acceptable behavior by them (IMHO). The fact that they are
querying
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Malcolm Staudinger wrote:
> Google is your friend?
> They're a search engine. robots.txt and forget it.
>
> Malcolm
That's assuming whoever designed their software actually adheres
to robots.txt. RFCs recommend people adhere to it, but there are
some wh
> :-) Let me add something before everyone on NANOG reminds me that
> gigablast is a search engine. I know what they do, but what I don't
> understand is why are they searching my systems for URLs that haven't
> ever existed there before. It's as though they are doing random word
> searches
Thats exactly it... they are doing site indexing .. if you like google...
you'll need to like them! =P
I personally wouldnt worry about anything in the logs unless you start
seeing attempts to search and exploit .cgi and executable files...
-Payam
>
> Google is your friend?
> They're a searc
Google is your friend?
They're a search engine. robots.txt and forget it.
Malcolm
Jim Popovitch wrote:
Feel free to clue me in on this please... ;-)
What is www.gigablast.com? And why is it constantly performing
"questionable" queries (mostly http) across every IP that I have
access to c
:-) Let me add something before everyone on NANOG reminds me that
gigablast is a search engine. I know what they do, but what I don't
understand is why are they searching my systems for URLs that haven't
ever existed there before. It's as though they are doing random word
searches in hop
Feel free to clue me in on this please... ;-)
What is www.gigablast.com? And why is it constantly performing
"questionable" queries (mostly http) across every IP that I have access
to check.
I get a could of thousand hits (mostly questionable non-existing URL
requests) from that ip (66.15
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Keith Mitchell wrote:
to violating the principle of net neutrality. Almost always NATed,
I've been told that quite a lot of the GPRS equipment can't handle being
put on the "internet" without a FW or NAT box in front of it. The
background noise from scans etc takes quit
Joe Greco wrote:
> Don't call it Internet access if it isn't. This has bothered me for
> years at hotels where I end up using GPRS because their stupid
> "Internet access" system is some sort of web proxy that resets any
> connection over two minutes;
ISTM that GPRS operators are the first and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
Just wondering if anyone on here works at HopOne's Network Eng. dep/Noc...
let me know off list...
Thanks,
-Payam
Hey,
Whats up?
-Bill
--
Bill Sehmel - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 1-206-242-2743
Systems Administrator, HopOne Internet Corp.
On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Tuesday 11 Jul 2006 20:22, Daniel Golding wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain why people are
trying so hard to condemn something like this.
Experience?
People have never created a platform to manage recursive DNS, so it's
surprising you
Hey guys,
Just wondering if anyone on here works at HopOne's Network Eng. dep/Noc...
let me know off list...
Thanks,
-Payam
Hello;
The Multicast Backbone deployment (Mboned) Working Group of the IETF
is conducting a Survey of Multicast operators and providers. The
survey is intended to better understand the current state of
multicast to better inform the work of the Mboned, and I would like
to encourage netwo
>
> > Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?
>
> The problem is: the route is coming from our upstreams / peers.
> that means they also did not filter it out... :(
oh bummer ;( that's not us sending that is it? :) Honestly, prefix
filtering should apply in both direc
On Jul 12, 2006, at 3:30 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Tuesday 11 Jul 2006 20:22, Daniel Golding wrote:
I'm at a loss to explain why people are
trying so hard to condemn something like this.
Experience?
Please explain to me what experience anyone on this list, or any
other, which would ind
> Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?
The problem is: the route is coming from our upstreams / peers.
that means they also did not filter it out... :(
-yf
On Tuesday 11 Jul 2006 20:22, Daniel Golding wrote:
>
> I'm at a loss to explain why people are
> trying so hard to condemn something like this.
Experience?
18 matches
Mail list logo
