Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Scott Weeks") writes: > ... I'm just saying that there has to be a better way than police-type > actions on a global scale. ... no, there doesn't have to be such a way. where the stakes are in meatspace (pun unintended), the remediation has to be in meatspace. cyberspace i

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

Barry Shein wrote: On August 1, 2006 at 11:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Weeks) wrote: >... > there has to be a technical way to do this, rather > than a diplomatic way as the diplomatic ways historically > have not worked in the other areas mentioned, so they > probably won't work here,

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

- Original Message Follows - From: "Fergie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >mentioned haven't worked at all. I'm just saying that > there >has to be a better way than police-type actions on > a global >scale. Also, I'm sure many more smart people > Personally, I think there is wiggle-room betwe

Re: APC Matrix 5000 question(s)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update: I replaced the batteries today, and indeed, several of the old ones (mostly in the first pack) were split and some had popped a couple of their "sealed" tops. I left for several hours and came back to the house stinking like burning rubber. The new batteries ar

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

-- "Scott Weeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >Yes, you're correct. I didn't mean to say the things you >mentioned haven't worked at all. I'm just saying that there >has to be a better way than police-type actions on a global >scale. Also, I'm sure many more smart people will work on >it

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

- Original Message Follows - From: Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On August 1, 2006 at 11:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott > Weeks) wrote: > >... > > there has to be a technical way to do this, rather > > than a diplomatic way as the diplomatic ways > > historically have not worked in

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

On August 1, 2006 at 11:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Weeks) wrote: >... > there has to be a technical way to do this, rather > than a diplomatic way as the diplomatic ways historically > have not worked in the other areas mentioned, so they > probably won't work here, either. Or we have t

RE: BGP and GLB.

Anycast - it is a widget - not a solution. Go here http://www.nanog.org/subjects.html, look for Anycast, and watch the VODs. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Sherrard > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 5:54 PM > To: nanog@mer

BGP and GLB.

Does anyone know of some good writeup that details using BGP as a form of global load balancing, between multiple sites. Rob

[no subject]

unsubscribe -- -- http://www.zeromemory.com - metal for your ears.

Re: APC Matrix 5000 question(s)

--On July 28, 2006 9:33:59 AM -0400 "Robert E.Seastrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I left for several hours and came back to the house stinking like burning rubber. The new batteries are apparently melting the terminal rubber insulation. I had to throw it bac

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

- Original Message Follows - From: Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > That's all fine and dandy until you consider the > > international base of these things. I'd like to see > a meeting at the Massachussets state house probably around > 1998 and being shouted down by this reasoning

Re: Detecting parked domains

I have a large list of parked domains how would you like to query it and why do you want to? -rick Sean Donelan wrote: Has anyone come up with a quick method for detecting if a domain name is parked, but is not being used except displaying ads? I'm hoping there is other method besides chasi

Re: Detecting parked domains

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:35:40PM -0400, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 6 lines which said: Has anyone come up with a quick method for detecting if a domain name is parked, but is not being used except displaying ads? I don't think it is

Re: Detecting parked domains

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:35:40PM -0400, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 6 lines which said: > Has anyone come up with a quick method for detecting if a domain > name is parked, but is not being used except displaying ads? I don't think it is possible: "being parked" cann

Detecting parked domains

Has anyone come up with a quick method for detecting if a domain name is parked, but is not being used except displaying ads? I'm hoping there is other method besides chasing a list of constantly changing IP addresses being used by the parking advertising companies.

Odd named messages...

Has anyone else seen an increase of the following named errors? Aug 1 01:00:09 morannon /usr/sbin/named[21279]: dispatch 0x4035bd70: shutting down due to TCP receive error: unexpected error Aug 1 01:00:09 morannon /usr/sbin/named[21279]: dispatch 0x4035bd70: shutting down due to TCP receive er

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

Paul Vixie wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Scott Weeks") writes: From: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... I'd like to see "...jackbooted [US is implied in the text] government thugs...kicking in a door somewhere ... Paul, it is people lik

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Scott Weeks") writes: > From: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ... I'd like to see "...jackbooted [US is implied in the text] > government thugs...kicking in a door somewhere ... i apologize for writing so sloppily

botnet info

Is there a compiled list of network ranges that are being used as botnets avaialble anywhere that is kept relatively up to date? I've got a few networks within my influence that I'd like to ensure aren't being dirty. Thanks. -- Micheal Patterson

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

On July 31, 2006 at 08:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Weeks) wrote: > > That's all fine and dandy until you consider the > international base of these things. I'd like to see > "...jackbooted [US is implied in the text] government > thugs...kicking in a door somewhere and confiscating every

AOL Email Contact me offline please

It is not about spam or being blocked I actually would like to speak with someone about services provided. This is very important as I can not find my answers on the postmasters website. Thank you

Drone Armies C&C Report - 01 Aug 2006

This is a periodic public report from the ISOTF's affiliated group 'DA' (Drone Armies (botnets) research and mitigation mailing list / TISF DA) with the ISOTF affiliated ASreport project (TISF / RatOut). For this report it should be noted that we base our analysis on the data we have accumulate