On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:31 -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
Who forwards NANOG posts to a blogger gateway? You, me, and a
claw-hammer need to have a chat.
Can I join in the fun? I'll bring some tubing along, Sin City style ;)
Begin forwarded message:
Blogger does not accept
Can someone from the Yahoo peering group please contact me off-list?
The official channels are being ignored.
Thanks!
--
Chris Griffin[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Network Engineer - CCNP Phone: (352) 392-2061
Network Services / Florida LambdaRail
Done. The joys of summer/ vacations!
-- Brokaw
Brokaw Price
Business Development, Network Engineering
Yahoo, Inc.
Office: +214.782.4048
Cell: +214.405.6900
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Connected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
Hoping someone may
be able to help.
Could someone please
point me in the direction of any legislation / regulations that would effect
providers of "Internet access" (DSL Metro Ethernet)services to
residential and business customers located in the US
andCanada.
Am I correct in my
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:56:58 EDT, Richard A Steenbergen said:
And may there be a special circle of hell reserved for the weenies who do
stupid unnecessary shit that breaks more than it fixes in the name of
security. :)
Anybody announced 127/8 lately? Did anybody actually notice/care? :)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:56:58 EDT, Richard A Steenbergen said:
And may there be a special circle of hell reserved for the weenies who do
stupid unnecessary shit that breaks more than it fixes in the name of
security. :)
Anybody announced
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
It sure would be interesting to see what traffic unallocated space gets
beyond some dark matter that floats into honey nets of sorts here and
there.
if you route 127.0.0.0/8 to a host you sometimes get interesting syslog
messages :) (sent to 127.0.0.1
At 12:03 PM 8/15/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:56:58 EDT, Richard A Steenbergen said:
And may there be a special circle of hell reserved for the weenies who do
stupid unnecessary shit that breaks more than it fixes in the name of
security. :)
Anybody announced 127/8
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Simon Waters wrote:
I've no doubt some captcha can be invented in ASCII, but this isn't
it.
'tis. It works for at least one blog platform, where I've never once
had comment spam.
a kid), and it would be relatively trivial to code it to handle the
types of questions
This is quite informative, in a surprising fashion. It is not often we get
something of the funny sort in the BGP realm. Please avoid it if
sensitive to the.. more rude type of content.
http://www.routergod.com/?p=40
This is one way to lighten the mood on NANOG, and at the same time insert
some
Joe McGuckinViaNet Communications[EMAIL PROTECTED]650-207-0372 cell650-213-1302 office650-969-2124 fax
Paul Jakma wrote:
ASCII captches are no less effective than image-captcha just without
the nasty ban the blind from the internet! side-effects.
Then again you have Authen::Captcha that has sound based Captcha's as
well
/ Mat
12 matches
Mail list logo
