### On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:25:50 -0400,
### "Ray Burkholder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> casually decided to expound upon
###
### the following thoughts about "RE: Cisco SLA data access via SNMP?":
RB> > On one of the systems I'm getting a cricket error of:
RB> > "illegal attempt to update +using time
>
> On one of the systems I'm getting a cricket error of:
> "illegal attempt to update +using time 1163791808 when last
> update time is
> 1163791808 (minimum one second step) "
>
There was a problem with a number of Tunnel interfaces not getting
processed. Things are good now. Cisco QoS a
This is a periodic public report from the ISOTF's affiliated group 'DA'
(Drone Armies (botnets) research and mitigation mailing list / TISF
DA) with the ISOTF affiliated ASreport project (TISF / RatOut).
For this report it should be noted that we base our analysis on the data
we have accumulate
SW> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:53 +
SW> From: Stephen Wilcox
SW> you can override it (on cisco) with allow-own-as
s/allow-own-as/allowas-in/
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-c
neal, all,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 05:46:43PM -0600, nealr wrote:
> I've not watched here closely for a number of years, but I now have a
> Sprint connected customer who is hating life and Cogent seems to be part
> of the equation. Can someone fill me in on the history of their
> relationship
I've not watched here closely for a number of years, but I now have a
Sprint connected customer who is hating life and Cogent seems to be part
of the equation. Can someone fill me in on the history of their
relationship?
I never thought Sprint would ever renew its relationship with Spri
> Ray,
>
>Do you have an example of accessing the SLA data via SNMP?
> I've just got interested in those things, I've found the OIDs
> required, but its all a bit of a maze ... I could really use
> some jitter information in a couple of places right about now ...
>
A number of people hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As a follow-up to my previous message re: "RFC2827-bis
comments solicitation", we now have a dedicated mailing
list for discussion of bringing BCP38 up-to-date:
[snip]
ietf-bcp38bis mailing list
The ietf-bcp38bis mailing list is for discussing an u
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED
So, what happened on 23 October, since you're putting this up for
examination?
--
Joe Yao
---
This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet via the same ISP_A. I am us
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:44:11AM -0800, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a
> rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my
> other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.
On Nov 17, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am
advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my
location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising
another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Lavine wrote:
> To all,
>
> Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a
> rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my
> other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.
To all,
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte
1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other
location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the
Internet via the same ISP_A. I am using the same AS for
My question is whether the number resource including IP address is
trading item or not.
In my understanding, IP address is allocated from ARIN based on use
right, not as an asset.
If one network is acquired by somebody else, IP address is transfer to
new guy based on network engineering plan,
16 matches
Mail list logo
