RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread W.D.McKinney
_ From: Rod Beck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hank Nussbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:20 -0800 Subject: RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break Protected 10 gig waves NYC

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Frank Coluccio
To clarify my last post, and to partly correct it, I was referring to VZ's new TPE China cable, where I mentioned pending pricing and T&C information. Of course, VZ already meshes its IP backbones, as a matter of course today, in existing systems. Frank A. Coluccio DTI Consulting Inc. 212-587-815

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Frank Coluccio
Interestingly, some major transoceanic undertakings have begun looking very favorably towards a meshed topology solution, eschewing rings. Verizon is championing this approach at the present time as a consortium partner in the Trans-Pacific Express (TPE) cable laying venture to China, and offers j

Backhoes and restoration (was: TransAtlantic Cable Break)

2007-06-22 Thread Deepak Jain
One backhoe hit took out the first half of the cable, but the digger realized he goofed and stopped. The fiber company then cut the rest of the bundle to cleanly fix the cut... without warning anyone who was running on their failover protected circuit that something might be about to happen.

AT&T $10 DSL plan

2007-06-22 Thread William Allen Simpson
Apparently, this has been in the news for a couple of days, but only just hit my hometown paper === AT&T Inc. has started offering a broadband Internet service for $10 a month, cheaper than any advertised plan. The DSL, or digital subscriber line, plan introduced Saturday is part of the con

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread George William Herbert
>Is paying for "protected circuits" actually worth it. Or are you better >off just buying two circuits and using both during normal conditions. >Use switching at layer 3 to the remaining circuit during abnormal >conditions. Most of the time, you get twice the capacity for only twice >the pri

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Steve Gibbard
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0400, Roderick S. Beck wrote: So none of the customers on that well known system have any ring protection at this point nor will they during the next two weeks. [...] Oh, there *is* no "*other* other side"? That must

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Rod Beck
Protected 10 gig waves NYC/London are extremely expensive. Say $60K or more per month. So it usually makes sense for the Layer 3 guys to lease diversely routed 10 gig waves and do the protection themselves using MPLS or load balancing or some other protocol about which I know little ... Roder

Anyone else using Global Crossing for transit having an unusually high amount of problems today?

2007-06-22 Thread Drew Weaver
Could be that it is localized to the Cleveland area, but is anyone else noticing issues with glbx? -Drew No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007 3:02 PM

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Roderick S. Beck
You would be surprised at how many don't split their traffic among several cable systems or if they do split, do due diligence on the terrestrial backhaul that most of these cables share on the US and UK sides. There is lot of cost pressure in the IP market and it is very tempting to give all the

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Sean Donelan
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Hank Nussbacher wrote: Tell that to the 10 gig wave customers who lost service. Very few cable systems provide protection at the 10 gig wave level. If you don't pay the extra amount for a protected circuit, why should your circuit get protection for free when others have

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Roderick S. Beck wrote: Tell that to the 10 gig wave customers who lost service. Very few cable systems provide protection at the 10 gig wave level. If you don't pay the extra amount for a protected circuit, why should your circuit get protection for free when others hav

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Roderick S. Beck wrote: > > Yes, since most cables have multiple IP backbones on them, and this one > has only one ... there's a transatlantic cable system with only 1 IP backbone using it?? Really? is it just a tiny cable with little capacity? Or is the consortium that ow

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:59 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oh, there *is* no "*other* other side"? That must be what Roderick meant.. ;) And he just happens to have an email addr that suggests he's involved with a company that sells that *other* other side. Just saying. Don't get me wrong..

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Neil J. McRae
> Tell that to the 10 gig wave customers who lost service. Very few cable > systems provide protection at the 10 gig wave level. But surely you knew that going into the deal and did something about it? Neil.

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Roderick S. Beck
Thank you Vladis for pointing out that untidy detail .. :) Best Regards, Roderick. > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:43:46 EDT, Jim Popovitch said: >> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0400, Roderick S. Beck wrote: >> > So none of the customers on that well known system have any ring >> > protection at this

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Roderick S. Beck
Yes, since most cables have multiple IP backbones on them, and this one has only one ... > > >> This cable system is also a major IP backbone player. >> >> So it shouldn't be too hard to guess their identity. > > You think? > > Roderick S. Beck. Global Wholesale Bandwidth, LLC Manhattan & Paris

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Roderick S. Beck
Tell that to the 10 gig wave customers who lost service. Very few cable systems provide protection at the 10 gig wave level. > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0400, Roderick S. Beck wrote: >> the real news is that one of the TransAtlantic cables has had one >> of their two cables severed. Repair

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:43:46 EDT, Jim Popovitch said: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0400, Roderick S. Beck wrote: > > So none of the customers on that well known system have any ring > > protection at this point nor will they during the next two weeks. > Isn't that the way a ring works? Sounds l

RE: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Neil J. McRae
> This cable system is also a major IP backbone player. > > So it shouldn't be too hard to guess their identity. You think?

Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0400, Roderick S. Beck wrote: > the real news is that one of the TransAtlantic cables has had one > of their two cables severed. Repair is not expected until after > the US July 4th holiday. > > So none of the customers on that well known system have any ring > prot

TransAtlantic Cable Break

2007-06-22 Thread Roderick S. Beck
Well, despite all this talk about the Latin fiber break, the real news is that one of the TransAtlantic cables has had one of their two cables severed. Repair is not expected until after the US July 4th holiday. So none of the customers on that well known system have any ring protection at this p